Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix typos #23152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions x/accounts/defaults/lockup/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -118,15 +118,15 @@ The spendable amount is calculated as:
`spendableAmount` = `balance` - `notBondedLockedAmount`
where `notBondedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `Min(lockedAmount, delegatedLockedAmount)`

As seen in the formula `notBondedLockedAmout` can only be 0 or a positive value when `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `LockedAmount`. Let call `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` is the `delegatedLockedAmount` when applying N slash
As seen in the formula `notBondedLockedAmount` can only be 0 or a positive value when `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `LockedAmount`. Let call `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` is the `delegatedLockedAmount` when applying N slash

1. Case 1: Originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` but when applying the slash amount the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` then
* When not applying slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be 0
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = a positive amount
* When not applying slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be 0
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = a positive amount
2. Case 2: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` < `lockedAmount` then
* When not applying slash `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount`
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmout` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `(DelegatedLockedAmount - N)` = `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount` + N
3. Case 3: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount still the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` then `notBondedLockedAmout` will be 0 applying slash or not
* When apply slash `notBondedLockedAmount` will be `lockedAmount` - `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` = `lockedAmount` - `(DelegatedLockedAmount - N)` = `lockedAmount` - `DelegatedLockedAmount` + N
3. Case 3: where originally `DelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` when applying the slash amount still the `NewDelegatedLockedAmount` > `lockedAmount` then `notBondedLockedAmount` will be 0 applying slash or not

In cases 1 and 2, `notBondedLockedAmount` decreases when not applying the slash, resulting in a higher `spendableAmount`.

Expand Down
Loading