Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pull: don't resolve short names on explicit docker:// reference #582

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Fixes: #581
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg rothberg@redhat.com

@rhatdan @mtrmac PTAL

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 26, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK.

Esthetically I’d prefer a copySingleImageFromRegistryReference, called by

  • explicit docker:// reference like this case
  • in a loop, the AllTags implementation looping over tags
  • in a loop, in the possibly-unqualified not-transport-qualified case looping over resolution outcome

rather than letting the docker:// reference go through the short-name lookup code and various possible normalization.

OTOH this works, and is much less work.

Fixes: containers#581
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 26, 2021

/lgtm

This one we might want to get into Final release?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label May 26, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 386234b into containers:master May 26, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the pull-short-names branch May 26, 2021 15:54
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/lgtm

This one we might want to get into Final release?

Shall I backport to the 0.38 branch?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 26, 2021

I am not sure how often this syntax would be used. So we might be able to wait until podman 3.3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

libimage: pull: don't resolve short names on explicit docker:// reference
4 participants