Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/core#1059 Fix contribution search to work with url parameters in force mode #14624

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2019

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton commented Jun 24, 2019

Overview

This is an additional PR in the work on converting receive_date to a datepicker - it fixes an issue where url parameters were not being respected in force mode

Before

From manage contribution page choose contributions this month - date criteria not applied

After

Date criteria applied

Technical Details

@seamuslee001 this is the missing piece on your PR - not I will rebase out the patch from #14477 once this is merged

Comments

I couldn't find other references to 'contribution_date' - I think there is a test for relative dates that references it still which should probably be fixed...

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Jun 24, 2019

(Standard links)

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton can you rebase pls?

This adds url support for sort_name & participant_status_id & participant_register_date to event search

civicrm/event/search?reset=1&sort_name=p&participant_status_id=1&participant_register_date_low=20180101
…force mode

Note this is part of the general 'convert receive_date to datepicker' work
@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

I went back to 4.5 and confirmed that using force ignores all other defaults merging

@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 merged commit 50a28e0 into civicrm:master Jun 25, 2019
@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 deleted the force_defaults branch June 25, 2019 21:37
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seamuslee001 cross fingers we've found 'all the places' - have you retested batch search? I haven't yet. Maybe we should add it to the rc list

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

@eileenmcnaughton yes re tested there and seems to be working fine

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seamuslee001 great - we might be through it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants