Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CRM-20768 - Install UI - Accept mysql port #10553

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

totten
Copy link
Member

@totten totten commented Jun 23, 2017

== Background ==

In previous releases, the web-based installation script allowed you to enter
the MySQL "server" with a host:port combination (e.g. 127.0.0.1:3307).

I believe this regressed during the mysql=>mysqli transition.

== Before ==

If you use the web-based install UI and enter a host:port combination, the
error messages indicate a confusing mix of information (e.g. some
indicating port 3306, some indicating port 3307).

== After ==

If you use the web-based install UI and enter a host:port combination, it
uses the specified port.


== Background ==

In previous releases, the web-based installation script allowed you to enter
the MySQL "server" with a `host:port` combination (e.g.  `127.0.0.1:3307`).

I believe this regressed during the mysql=>mysqli transition.

== Before ==

If you use the web-based install UI and enter a `host:port` combination, the
error messages indicate a confusing mix of information (e.g.  some
indicating port 3306, some indicating port 3307).

== After ==

If you use the web-based install UI and enter a `host:port` combination, it
uses the specified port.

----------------------------------------
* CRM-20768: Web-based installation should accept non-standard MySQL port
  https://issues.civicrm.org/jira/browse/CRM-20768
@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

@totten Tim, just wondering do you think its worth targeting the RC on this or not?

@totten totten changed the title CRM-20768 - install - Accept mysql port CRM-20768 - Install UI - Accept mysql port Jun 23, 2017
@totten
Copy link
Member Author

totten commented Jun 23, 2017

Is that a tacit endorsement for targeting RC? ;)

My gut reaction: Yes. But I might be biased, and I have no fancy arguments for why. If you're +1 for RC, then I'll resubmit.

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

I figure that this could be impacting people who may struggle with installing and i think it would be safe enough given this is only on install not upgrade and i think the sooner it is fixed the better tbh

@totten
Copy link
Member Author

totten commented Jun 23, 2017

OK. Closing in favor #10555.

@totten totten closed this Jun 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants