-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
20.09 #577
20.09 #577
Conversation
Move ARG variables in the proper scope
Update galaxy-server Dockerfile
This happend on some cluster-base builds but just a few:
I guess it is a problem with github or cvm |
This reverts commit 23bb51b.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This happend on some cluster-base builds but just a few:
#8 6.872 Hit:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease #8 7.866 Err:6 https://cvmrepo.web.cern.ch/cvmrepo/apt focal-prod InRelease #8 7.866 403 Forbidden [IP: 188.185.87.216 443] #8 7.873 Reading package lists... #8 8.566 E: Failed to fetch http://cvmrepo.web.cern.ch/cvmrepo/apt/dists/focal-prod/InRelease 403 Forbidden [IP: 188.185.87.216 443] #8 8.566 E: The repository 'http://cvmrepo.web.cern.ch/cvmrepo/apt focal-prod InRelease' is not signed.
I guess it is a problem with github or cvm
This happens again, annoying
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
FROM alpine:3.11 | |||
|
|||
ENV TEST_REPO=${TEST_REPO:-https://github.com/usegalaxy-eu/workflow-testing} \ | |||
TEST_RELEASE=${TEST_RELEASE:-master} | |||
ENV TEST_REPO=${TEST_REPO:-https://github.com/jonas27/workflow-testing} \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BEFORE MERGE: Check if this is ok!
- It comments out the data types in the workflows.
- If not the tests fail on the metadata and throw an error on samtools wanting to scan an empty file.
@jonas27 what's up on this PR? do you think it's ok to merge? |
The diff looks good + it can't hurt => I'm merging |
@abretaud that was too fast for me ;) |
Ahah, sorry, I was too impatient! Anyway there were less red tests here than in #569 so I guess it can only be better :) |
Nw. I was referring to the tests inside the github actions and true, it is probably better ;) |
No description provided.