fix(obstacle_avoidance_planner): adding missing functionality for footprint marker

[ahmeddesokyebrahim]

Description

This PR is to add missing functionality of footprint marker in obstacle_avoidance_planner since refactoring done in #2796 .

Related links

closes #4190

Tests performed

Same as mentioned in original PR : #2689

Notes for reviewers

Original PR : #2689
Refactoring PR : #2796

Interface changes

N.A.

Effects on system behavior

This PR creates a separate footprint marker and appends it to marker_array in obstacle_avoidance_planner for easier debugging.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.12 ⚠️

Comparison is base (91a8432) 15.16% compared to head (2d5a4db) 15.05%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4193      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   15.16%   15.05%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files        1496     1508      +12     
  Lines      102997   103630     +633     
  Branches    31636    31645       +9     
==========================================
- Hits        15624    15598      -26     
- Misses      70365    71034     +669     
+ Partials    17008    16998      -10     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	39.27% <0.00%> (?)
total	15.05% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from d0685fc

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...alizer/src/camera/camera_pose_initializer_core.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...bloc_pose_initializer/src/camera/marker_module.cpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ject_tracker/data_association/data_association.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...association/solver/mu_successive_shortest_path.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
..._object_tracker_node/radar_object_tracker_node.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ct_tracker/tracker/model/linear_motion_tracker.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...adar_object_tracker/tracker/model/tracker_base.hpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
..._tracker/src/data_association/data_association.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rtest_path/mu_successive_shortest_path_wrapper.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
..._object_tracker_node/radar_object_tracker_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 9 more

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[ahmeddesokyebrahim]

@mehmetdogru : May you please have a look and confirm it is doing the functionality intended as original implementation ?

[mehmetdogru]

LGTM, thank you for the implementation

[ahmeddesokyebrahim]

@TakaHoribe - @kosuke55 - @takayuki5168 :
May anyone have a look please ?