Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(tier4_perception_launch): add enable_fine_detection_option #1991

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2022

Conversation

shmpwk
Copy link
Contributor

@shmpwk shmpwk commented Sep 30, 2022

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp

Description

Add enable_fine_detection option for perception launcher.
The current trained model of fine detection is finetuned with the real environment. Thus it is difficult to adapt the simulation environment now. If we reproduce perception module in the degital twin simulation environment for example, we should set enable_fine_detection:=false.
This is needed with the new degital twin launcher.

Related links

autowarefoundation/autoware_launch#98

Tests performed

I tested this launcher with TIERIV INTERNAL DEGITAL TWIN SIMULATOR and it works as we expected.

Notes for reviewers

None

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
/>
<arg name="use_pointcloud_container" default="false" description="launch pointcloud container"/>
<arg name="pointcloud_container_name" default="pointcloud_container"/>
<arg name="enable_fine_detection" default="true"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about this?

Suggested change
<arg name="enable_fine_detection" default="true"/>
<!-- Traffic Light Recognition Parameters -->
<arg name="traffic_light_recognition/enable_fine_detection" default="true"/>

Copy link
Contributor Author

@shmpwk shmpwk Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems nice!
I commited it by c803812.

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 10.34% // Head: 10.34% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (4bd01c2) compared to base (7648dec).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 4bd01c2 differs from pull request most recent head de605ab. Consider uploading reports for the commit de605ab to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1991   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   10.34%   10.34%           
=======================================
  Files        1162     1162           
  Lines       82744    82744           
  Branches    19280    19280           
=======================================
  Hits         8559     8559           
  Misses      64925    64925           
  Partials     9260     9260           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential ∅ <ø> (?)
total 10.32% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7648dec

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@yukkysaito yukkysaito self-requested a review September 30, 2022 02:10
Copy link
Contributor

@yukkysaito yukkysaito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shmpwk shmpwk enabled auto-merge (squash) September 30, 2022 02:12
@shmpwk shmpwk merged commit 6a6532b into autowarefoundation:main Sep 30, 2022
@shmpwk shmpwk deleted the feat/arg_fine_detection branch September 30, 2022 04:28
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
…warefoundation#1991)

* feat(tier4_perception_launch): add enable_fine_detection_option

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* ci(pre-commit): autofix

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
…warefoundation#1991)

* feat(tier4_perception_launch): add enable_fine_detection_option

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* ci(pre-commit): autofix

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
…warefoundation#1991)

* feat(tier4_perception_launch): add enable_fine_detection_option

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* chore: rename

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>

* ci(pre-commit): autofix

Signed-off-by: Shumpei Wakabayashi <shumpei.wakabayashi@tier4.jp>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants