GH-38630: [MATLAB] arrow.array.BooleanArray's toMATLAB method does not take slice offsets into account
#38636
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The dev failure seems unrelated to my changes. |
|
Looks like #38639 will fix the Dev/Lint CI failure. |
|
Looks like the Dev GitHub Action failure was fixed by #38639. |
kevingurney
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2023
|
+1 |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 4983885. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 9 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
loicalleyne
pushed a commit
to loicalleyne/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2023
…od does not take slice offsets into account (apache#38636) ### Rationale for this change While working on apache#38415, I noticed that the `toMATLAB` method of `arrow.array.BooleanArray` does not take the slice offset into account. This will cause the `toMATLAB` method to return the wrong value. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Updated `arrow::matlab::bit::unpack` function to accept a `start_offset` as input. 2. Updated clients (`BooleanArray::toMATLAB` and `Array::getValid`) to supply the array `offset` as the `start_offset`. ### Are these changes tested? The existing tests cover these changes. Additionally, the changes for apache#38415 will include tests that verify the `toMATLAB` method returns the correct MATLAB array when the underlying Arrow array has been sliced. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#38630 Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <sgilmore@mathworks.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
…od does not take slice offsets into account (apache#38636) ### Rationale for this change While working on apache#38415, I noticed that the `toMATLAB` method of `arrow.array.BooleanArray` does not take the slice offset into account. This will cause the `toMATLAB` method to return the wrong value. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Updated `arrow::matlab::bit::unpack` function to accept a `start_offset` as input. 2. Updated clients (`BooleanArray::toMATLAB` and `Array::getValid`) to supply the array `offset` as the `start_offset`. ### Are these changes tested? The existing tests cover these changes. Additionally, the changes for apache#38415 will include tests that verify the `toMATLAB` method returns the correct MATLAB array when the underlying Arrow array has been sliced. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#38630 Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <sgilmore@mathworks.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
While working on #38415, I noticed that the
toMATLABmethod ofarrow.array.BooleanArraydoes not take the slice offset into account. This will cause thetoMATLABmethod to return the wrong value.What changes are included in this PR?
arrow::matlab::bit::unpackfunction to accept astart_offsetas input.BooleanArray::toMATLABandArray::getValid) to supply the arrayoffsetas thestart_offset.Are these changes tested?
The existing tests cover these changes. Additionally, the changes for #38415 will include tests that verify the
toMATLABmethod returns the correct MATLAB array when the underlying Arrow array has been sliced.Are there any user-facing changes?
No.
arrow.array.BooleanArray'stoMATLABmethod does not take slice offsets into account #38630