-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(rxjs): update rxjs to 6.3.2 #12357
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
{ | ||
"builders": "builders.json", | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"rxjs": "6.2.2" | ||
"rxjs": "6.3.2" | ||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ | |
], | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"@angular-devkit/core": "0.0.0", | ||
"rxjs": "6.2.2" | ||
"rxjs": "6.3" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Shouldn't this be |
||
} | ||
} |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ | |
"schematics": "./collection.json", | ||
"dependencies": { | ||
"@angular-devkit/core": "0.0.0", | ||
"@angular-devkit/schematics": "0.0.0" | ||
"@angular-devkit/schematics": "0.0.0", | ||
"rxjs": "6.3.2" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why does this need to be added here? AFAIK schematics/schematics do not directly depend on |
||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s not valid TypeScript is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's missing the input type, or doesn't it need it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's what Rado recommended in these situations. Unfortunately, TS can't infer the return in these cases where there's branching code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The input type is inferred.