anonymous user access to public space #7532
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to GraphQL schemas across multiple files, focusing on adding a new optional parameter Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)src/domain/access/RoleSetAdmin/useRoleSetAdmin.ts (1)Pattern
Inform about the recommendation of not using non-null assertion,
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/domain/access/graphql/fragments/RoleSetContributors.graphql (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The skip directive is correctly implemented and aligns well with the anonymous access requirements. The field will be appropriately hidden when unauthorized access is granted.
Consider adding a comment to document the purpose of this skip condition:
+ # Skip contactability status for anonymous/unauthorized access isContactable @skip(if: $authorizedReadAccessCommunity)src/domain/access/graphql/queries/RoleSetDetails.graphql (1)
22-22: LGTM! Consider query optimization.The new parameter is correctly implemented and maintains backward compatibility.
Consider optimizing the query by conditionally including fields based on roles and authorization:
query RoleSetRoleAssignment( $roleSetId: UUID! $roles: [RoleName!]! $includeUsers: Boolean = true, $includeOrganizations: Boolean = true, $includeVirtualContributors: Boolean = true, $authorizedReadAccessCommunity: Boolean = false ) { lookup { roleSet(ID: $roleSetId) { id + # Only fetch authorization when needed + authorization @skip(if: $authorizedReadAccessCommunity) { + id + myPrivileges + } usersInRoles(roles: $roles) @include(if: $includeUsers) { role users { ...RoleSetMemberUser } } # ... rest of the query } } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/domain/access/graphql/fragments/RoleSetContributors.graphql(1 hunks)src/domain/access/graphql/queries/RoleSetDetails.graphql(1 hunks)src/domain/journey/common/JourneyUnauthorizedDialog/JourneyData.graphql(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/domain/access/graphql/fragments/RoleSetContributors.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/domain/access/graphql/queries/RoleSetDetails.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyUnauthorizedDialog/JourneyData.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyUnauthorizedDialog/JourneyData.graphql (1)
1-1: LGTM! Verify fragment dependencies.The new parameter is correctly implemented with appropriate default value, maintaining backward compatibility.
Let's verify that all referenced fragments are updated to handle the new parameter:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Parameter correctly controls access to sensitive user data
The
$authorizedReadAccessCommunityparameter is properly implemented in all fragments, specifically controlling access to sensitive contact information in theRoleSetMemberUserfragment. No other fragments require this parameter as they don't expose sensitive data.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all referenced fragments handle $authorizedReadAccessCommunity # List all referenced fragments echo "Referenced fragments:" rg -l "fragment (ProfileJourneyData|ContextJourneyData|JourneyCommunity|RoleSetMemberUser|RoleSetMemberOrganization|ContributorDetails|ReferenceDetails|MetricsItem)" --type graphql # Check for potential missing @skip directives in these fragments echo -e "\nChecking for fields that might need @skip directive:" rg "type.*User.*{" -A 10 --type graphqlLength of output: 520
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find GraphQL files and analyze fragments echo "=== Finding GraphQL files ===" fd -e graphql echo -e "\n=== Checking fragment contents ===" fd -e graphql -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "fragment" echo -e "\n=== Checking @skip directives ===" fd -e graphql -x cat {} \; | grep -B 2 -A 2 "@skip"Length of output: 35860
src/domain/access/graphql/queries/RoleSetDetails.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Verify complete authorization flow.The changes implement a consistent approach to anonymous access control. However, we should verify the complete authorization flow to ensure proper access restrictions.
Let's check for potential security gaps:
✅ Verification successful
Authorization implementation verified and found to be robust
The codebase implements a comprehensive authorization system with:
- Dedicated authorization queries for different entity types (roles, platform, organization)
- Consistent use of authorization flags for conditional field access
- Proper privilege checking through authorization objects
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify authorization checks across the codebase # Check for other queries that might need the authorization parameter echo "Queries potentially needing authorization:" rg "query.*\(" --type graphql -l | xargs rg "User.*{" -l # Check for proper authorization checks in resolvers echo -e "\nChecking resolver implementations:" rg "class.*Resolver" -A 10Length of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for GraphQL queries and authorization patterns echo "=== GraphQL Queries with Authorization ===" fd -e graphql -x cat {} | grep -B2 -A2 "query.*Authorization" echo -e "\n=== Authorization Checks in Resolvers ===" # Look for resolver files and authorization patterns fd -e ts -e js | xargs grep -l "Resolver\|@Resolver" | while read -r file; do echo "=== File: $file ===" cat "$file" | grep -A 5 -B 5 "authorize\|permission\|@Auth\|@Allow" done echo -e "\n=== Security Decorators Usage ===" rg "@(Auth|Authorized|Allow|Permission)" -A 2Length of output: 7580
|
Closed in favor of #7541 |
fixes #7529
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
authorizedReadAccessCommunityto multiple GraphQL queries.isContactablefield based on authorization status.Improvements
isContactableproperty for users, organizations, and virtual contributors.