-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Role set admin #6974
Role set admin #6974
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new field Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Admin as Community Admin
participant GraphQL as GraphQL API
participant RoleSet as RoleSet Fragment
Admin->>GraphQL: Request admin users
GraphQL->>RoleSet: Fetch adminUsers
RoleSet-->>GraphQL: Return adminUsers data
GraphQL-->>Admin: Provide admin users data
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/fragments/RoleSetFragments.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-68
: Overall structure and GraphQL best practicesThe
RoleSetFragments.graphql
file maintains a clear and consistent structure. The fragments are well-defined and follow GraphQL best practices:
- Reusable fragments (e.g.,
CommunityMemberUser
) are used to ensure consistency across different parts of the schema.- The schema is modular, with separate fragments for different use cases (e.g.,
RoleSetDetails
,RoleSetAvailableLeadUsers
).- Pagination is implemented using the
PageInfo
fragment, which is a good practice for handling large datasets.To further improve the file:
- Consider adding descriptions to the fragments using GraphQL descriptions (""") for better documentation.
- Ensure that all fields have appropriate nullability (! where necessary) to prevent potential runtime errors.
Example of adding a description:
""" Detailed information about a role set, including users in different roles. """ fragment RoleSetDetails on RoleSet { # ... existing fields }src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (4)
Line range hint
121-121
: Fix variable shadowing in theadmins.find
methodIn the line
isAdmin: admins.find(admins => admins.id === user.id) !== undefined,
, the parameteradmins
in thefind
method shadows the outeradmins
array. This can lead to confusion and potential bugs. Rename the inner parameter toadmin
for clarity.Apply this diff to fix the variable shadowing:
-isAdmin: admins.find(admins => admins.id === user.id) !== undefined, +isAdmin: admins.find(admin => admin.id === user.id) !== undefined,
Line range hint
131-133
: Ensure consistent parameter naming in loopsWhen iterating over
leads
, ensure that parameter names do not shadow outer variables. In theadmins.forEach
loop, verify that the parameter is appropriately named to avoid confusion.Apply this diff if necessary:
-admins.forEach(admins => { +admins.forEach(admin => {
359-361
: Provide feedback whenroleSetId
is not availableIn the
handleUserAuthorizationChange
function, ifroleSetId
is not present, the function returns without any indication. Consider logging a warning or notifying the user that the operation cannot proceed due to the missingroleSetId
.Example:
if (!roleSetId) { console.warn('Cannot change user authorization: roleSetId is missing.'); return; }
Line range hint
401-405
: Implement error handling forhandleAddUser
functionThe
handleAddUser
function performs an asynchronous operation without error handling. Wrap the operation in atry...catch
block to handle exceptions and provide feedback in case of failures.Apply this pattern:
const handleAddUser = async (memberId: string) => { if (!roleSetId) { return; } try { await addUserToCommunity({ variables: { roleSetId, contributorId: memberId, role: CommunityRoleType.Member, }, }); await refetchAvailableMemberUsers(); return refetchCommunityMembers(); } catch (error) { console.error('Error adding user to community:', error); // Optionally, display an error message to the user } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/fragments/RoleSetFragments.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/fragments/RoleSetFragments.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/fragments/RoleSetFragments.graphql (1)
9-11
: Approved addition ofadminUsers
field with suggestionsThe new
adminUsers
field is a logical addition to theRoleSetDetails
fragment, consistent with the existing structure for other user roles. However, consider the following points:
Add a comment explaining the purpose and use case for this new field to improve code clarity.
Ensure that proper access controls are in place in the resolvers to prevent unauthorized access to admin user information.
Consider adding a comment above the new field:
# Retrieves users with ADMIN role for the current role set adminUsers: usersInRole(role: ADMIN) { ...CommunityMemberUser }To ensure this addition doesn't negatively impact query performance, run the following script:
Review the results to ensure that the new field is not being over-fetched or used in ways that could lead to performance issues.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Performance Issues Detected
The
adminUsers
field is currently not utilized in any GraphQL queries, ensuring that its addition does not impact query performance at this time.Please ensure that when
adminUsers
is integrated into queries in the future:
- Proper access controls are enforced in the resolvers to safeguard admin user information.
- Queries using
adminUsers
are optimized to prevent potential performance bottlenecks.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any large or potentially inefficient queries using the new adminUsers field # Search for queries using the RoleSetDetails fragment rg --type graphql 'query.*\{.*\.\.\.RoleSetDetails' -A 10 # Search for queries directly requesting adminUsers rg --type graphql 'query.*\{.*adminUsers'Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any large or potentially inefficient queries using the new adminUsers field # Find all .graphql and .gql files and search for queries using the RoleSetDetails fragment fd --extension graphql --extension gql --type f | xargs rg 'query.*\{.*\.\.\.RoleSetDetails' -A 10 # Find all .graphql and .gql files and search for queries directly requesting adminUsers fd --extension graphql --extension gql --type f | xargs rg 'query.*\{.*adminUsers'Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of the adminUsers field in GraphQL queries # Find all .graphql and .gql files and search for queries directly requesting adminUsers fd --extension graphql --extension gql --type f | xargs grep -H 'adminUsers' # Find any GraphQL fragments or queries using the RoleSetDetails fragment fd --extension graphql --extension gql --type f | xargs grep -H '\.\.\.RoleSetDetails'Length of output: 772
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (1)
533-533
: Ensure loading states are accurately representedThe
loading
state now only considersloadingMembers
andloadingApplications
. Verify that this accurately reflects all asynchronous operations, and include any additional loading states if necessary.Check if other loading states should be included:
loading: loadingMembers || loadingApplications || loadingOrganizations,If
loadingOrganizations
or other loading states are relevant, include them to ensure the UI reflects all active loading processes.
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (1)
189-189
: Ensure safety when spreading objectsWhen spreading
...roleSetData.lookup.space.provider
, ensure thatprovider
is defined to prevent runtime errors. Since you've already checkedif (roleSetData?.lookup.space?.provider) {
, this is currently safe. Consider adding a comment to clarify this logic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/useCommunityAdmin.ts (3)
72-72
: Consistent renaming ofdata
toroleSetData
improves clarityRenaming
data
toroleSetData
enhances readability by explicitly indicating that the data pertains to the role set. This change promotes better understanding of the code.
166-166
: Use optional chaining to prevent undefined errorsIn
isFacilitating: roleSetData?.lookup.space?.provider.id === member.id,
, accessingprovider.id
can cause an error ifprovider
isundefined
. Add optional chaining toprovider?.id
to safely handle potentialundefined
values.
178-178
: Use optional chaining to prevent undefined errorsSimilarly, in
isFacilitating: roleSetData?.lookup.space?.provider.id === lead.id,
, ensureprovider.id
is accessed safely using optional chaining.
* removed old code that was getting admins via usersWithCredentials query * moved lookup by credentials to be under the access folder * never undefined fix * removed usersWithCredentialsSimpleList * fix --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Cano <carlos@alkem.io>
Removes lookup using usersWithCredentials for admin of community.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
adminUsers
field in the RoleSetDetails fragment to retrieve users with ADMIN roles.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores