-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lifecycle api changes as part of move to XState 5 #7062
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@valentinyanakiev has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to environment variable declarations and several GraphQL queries and mutations across various files. Key updates involve the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
.build/docker/.env.base (2)
6-6
: LGTM: Collaboration URL variable addedThe
VITE_APP_COLLAB_URL
variable has been correctly added with the localhost URL. This is consistent with the development environment setup.Consider using the existing
VITE_APP_ALKEMIO_DOMAIN
variable instead of hardcoding the URL again. This would reduce duplication and make it easier to change the domain in the future. For example:-VITE_APP_COLLAB_URL=http://localhost:3000 +VITE_APP_COLLAB_URL=${VITE_APP_ALKEMIO_DOMAIN}
10-10
: LGTM: Version number updatedThe
VITE_APP_VERSION
has been correctly incremented to 0.75.0, which is appropriate for the significant changes being made to the lifecycle API.To ensure consistency across the project, please make sure to update the version number in other relevant files as well, such as:
package.json
CHANGELOG.md
(if you maintain one)- Any other configuration files that might reference the version number
This will help maintain version consistency throughout the project.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMemberships.graphql (1)
27-28
: Approved: Consistent simplification ininvitation
objectThe changes in the
invitation
object mirror those in theapplication
object, which is excellent for maintaining consistency across the schema. The direct inclusion of thestate
field and removal of thelifecycle
field simplifies the structure and improves readability.Suggestion for minor optimization:
Consider grouping similar fields together. For example, you could move thestate
field next to theid
field at the beginning of the object for better organization:invitation { id state welcomeMessage contributorType createdBy { id } createdDate }This grouping can make the schema more intuitive and easier to maintain in the future.
src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/adminGlobalOrganizationsList.graphql (1)
22-22
: Summary: API simplification aligns with project goals.The changes in this file are part of a larger effort to simplify the API by removing the
lifecycle
wrapper from various responses. This aligns well with the PR objectives of streamlining data handling and enhancing clarity in application state management.Key points:
- The
verification
field in theadminGlobalOrganizationsList
query has been simplified.- The
eventOnOrganizationVerification
response in theadminOrganizationVerify
mutation has been restructured.These changes should lead to more efficient data transfer and easier frontend handling. However, it's crucial to ensure that all dependent code (both frontend and backend) is updated to work with the new structure.
Consider adding a comment in the GraphQL file explaining the rationale behind these changes. This can help future developers understand the evolution of the API structure.
Also applies to: 46-47, 49-49
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.graphql (2)
31-33
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The removal of the
lifecycle
field simplifies the data structure, which aligns with the PR objectives. The retainedstate
andcreatedDate
fields should be sufficient for most use cases.Consider adding a comment explaining why only these fields are needed, for better maintainability:
application { id # Only state and creation date are needed for pending memberships state createdDate }
Line range hint
59-64
: LGTM! Consider reordering fields for consistency.The removal of the
lifecycle
field is consistent with the earlier changes and aligns with the PR objectives. The retained fields provide essential information about the invitation.For consistency with the
application
object, consider reordering the fields to groupstate
andcreatedDate
:invitation { id state createdDate welcomeMessage createdBy { id } contributor { id } contributorType }This ordering puts the most important status fields first and groups related information together.
src/domain/community/application/dialogs/ApplicationDialog.tsx (2)
80-80
: Approved: Type definition simplified.The change from
lifecycle?: any
tonextEvents: string[]
improves type safety and simplifies the data structure. This aligns well with TypeScript best practices.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to explain the purpose of
nextEvents
for better code documentation:/** Array of possible next events for the application */ nextEvents: string[];
Line range hint
58-60
: Address TODO and improve error handling.
The TODO comment indicates that this component is deprecated and needs to be rewritten. Consider creating a task to address this technical debt.
While the changes are sound, the overall error handling in the component could be improved. Consider adding more robust error checks and potentially implementing error boundaries for better user experience.
Would you like assistance in creating a task for the component rewrite or in implementing more robust error handling?
src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/useAdminGlobalOrganizationsList.ts (2)
74-74
: LGTM! Consider extracting the verification state to a constant.The change to access the verification state directly from
verification.state
is correct and aligns with the updated data structure. To improve code readability, consider extracting the verification state to a constant:const verificationState = orgFullData.verification.state; if (verificationState === OrgVerificationLifecycleStates.manuallyVerified) { // ... }This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-185
: Consider enhancing error handling and logging.While the overall implementation looks good, there are a few areas where error handling and logging could be improved:
- In the
handleVerification
function, consider adding more specific error handling and logging for theVERIFICATION_REQUEST
attempt:try { await verifyOrg({ variables: { input: { eventName: OrgVerificationLifecycleEvents.VERIFICATION_REQUEST, organizationVerificationID: orgFullData.verification.id, }, }, }); } catch (e) { console.error('VERIFICATION_REQUEST failed:', e); // Consider notifying the user about the failure }
- Add error handling for the license assignment and revocation operations:
const assignLicensePlan = async (accountId: string, licensePlanId: string) => { try { await assignLicense({ // ... existing code ... }); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to assign license plan:', error); notify(t('pages.admin.generic.sections.account.licenseUpdateFailed'), 'error'); } }; const revokeLicensePlan = async (accountId: string, licensePlanId: string) => { try { await revokeLicense({ // ... existing code ... }); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to revoke license plan:', error); notify(t('pages.admin.generic.sections.account.licenseUpdateFailed'), 'error'); } };These improvements will help with debugging and provide a better user experience by handling potential errors more gracefully.
src/domain/community/application/containers/ApplicationButtonContainer.tsx (1)
179-181
: Summary: State management refactoringThe changes in this file are part of a broader refactoring effort to simplify the application state management. The removal of the
lifecycle
property from both user and parent application states indicates a flattening of the data structure.While these changes improve code clarity, they may have implications for other parts of the codebase that expect the previous structure. To ensure a smooth transition:
- Review the results of the verification scripts provided in the previous comments.
- Update any components or utilities that may still be using the old
lifecycle.state
structure.- Conduct thorough testing of the entire application flow, paying special attention to state-dependent UI elements and transitions.
- Update relevant documentation to reflect the new state structure.
Consider creating a migration guide for the team, outlining the changes in the state management structure and providing examples of how to update components that may be affected by this refactoring.
src/domain/platform/admin/components/Organization/OrganizationForm.tsx (1)
43-44
: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the verification status.The changes to the
EmptyOrganization
constant simplify the structure by removing thelifecycle
object and movingstateIsFinal
to the top level of theverification
object. This aligns with the overall changes mentioned in the PR summary.For consistency and maintainability, consider using the
OrganizationVerificationEnum
for thestatus
value:status: OrganizationVerificationEnum.NotVerified,This ensures type safety and makes it easier to update if the enum values change in the future.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMembershipsBlock.tsx (2)
91-91
: LGTM! Consider using optional chaining for better readability.The change from
invitation.lifecycle.state
toinvitation.state
is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This simplification of the data structure is a good improvement.For better readability and to handle potential
undefined
values, consider using optional chaining:-communityInvitations.filter(({ invitation }) => !RECENT_MEMBERSHIP_STATES.includes(invitation.state ?? '')), +communityInvitations.filter(({ invitation }) => !RECENT_MEMBERSHIP_STATES.includes(invitation?.state ?? '')),
110-110
: LGTM! Consider using optional chaining for better readability.The change from
application.lifecycle.state
toapplication.state
is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This simplification of the data structure is a good improvement.For better readability and to handle potential
undefined
values, consider using optional chaining:-({ application }) => !RECENT_MEMBERSHIP_STATES.includes(application.state ?? '') +({ application }) => !RECENT_MEMBERSHIP_STATES.includes(application?.state ?? '')src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/CommunityApplications.tsx (3)
37-38
: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The changes to the
MembershipTableItem
type look good. Replacinglifecycle
withstate
andnextEvents
simplifies the data structure and aligns with the refactoring mentioned in the PR summary.Consider making
state
non-optional if it's always expected to have a value. If there are cases wherestate
can be undefined, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining those scenarios.
156-157
: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The
CreatePendingMembershipForApplication
function has been correctly updated to usestate
andnextEvents
instead oflifecycle
. The changes are consistent with the new type definition.Consider using the nullish coalescing operator (
??
) instead of the logical OR (||
) fornextEvents
:nextEvents: application.nextEvents ?? [],This would only use an empty array if
nextEvents
isnull
orundefined
, not for other falsy values like an empty array.
174-174
: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The
CreatePendingMembershipForInvitation
function has been correctly updated to usestate
andnextEvents
instead oflifecycle
. The changes are consistent with the new type definition.As suggested for the previous function, consider using the nullish coalescing operator:
nextEvents: invitation.nextEvents ?? [],This would only use an empty array if
nextEvents
isnull
orundefined
, not for other falsy values like an empty array.Also applies to: 176-176
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-helpers.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- .build/docker/.env.base (1 hunks)
- src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/mutations/eventOnApplication.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/queries/RoleSetApplicationsInvitations.graphql (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/application/containers/ApplicationButtonContainer.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/application/dialogs/ApplicationDialog.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/CommunityApplications.tsx (10 hunks)
- src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/adminGlobalOrganizationsList.graphql (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/useAdminGlobalOrganizationsList.ts (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/invitations/InvitationStateEventMutation.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/hooks/useUserMetadataWrapper.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/InvitationItem.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.graphql (2 hunks)
- src/domain/journey/space/pages/AdminSpaceCommunityPage.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/domain/journey/subspace/pages/AdminSubspaceCommunityPage.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/domain/platform/admin/components/Organization/OrganizationForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMemberships.graphql (3 hunks)
- src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMembershipsBlock.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (16)
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/mutations/eventOnApplication.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/queries/RoleSetApplicationsInvitations.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/community/application/containers/ApplicationButtonContainer.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/application/dialogs/ApplicationDialog.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/CommunityApplications.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/adminGlobalOrganizationsList.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/useAdminGlobalOrganizationsList.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/invitations/InvitationStateEventMutation.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/community/user/hooks/useUserMetadataWrapper.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/InvitationItem.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/domain/journey/space/pages/AdminSpaceCommunityPage.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/journey/subspace/pages/AdminSubspaceCommunityPage.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/platform/admin/components/Organization/OrganizationForm.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMemberships.graphql (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMembershipsBlock.tsx (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (27)
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/mutations/eventOnApplication.graphql (2)
1-2
: LGTM: Mutation name and input are well-defined.The mutation name
eventOnApplication
follows GraphQL naming conventions, and the use of a non-nullApplicationEventInput!
type for the input is appropriate for ensuring required data is provided.
3-6
: Approve response structure simplification, but verify client-side impact.The removal of the
lifecycle
field and promotion ofnextEvents
andstate
to the top level simplifies the response structure, which is a good practice in GraphQL. This change makes the data more directly accessible and aligns with the principle of keeping responses flat when possible.However, this structural change may impact client-side code that previously accessed these fields through the
lifecycle
object.To ensure a smooth transition, please run the following script to identify potential areas in the client-side code that may need updates:
Please review the output and update any client-side code that may be affected by this change.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No client-side impact from response structure changes.
The removal of the
lifecycle
field and the promotion ofnextEvents
andstate
to the top level have been verified. No existing client-side code references thelifecycle
structure, ensuring that these changes do not impact the client-side functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential client-side usage of the old 'lifecycle' structure # Search for 'lifecycle' usage in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' usage in TS/JS files:" rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -t web 'lifecycle\s*[.{[]' -g '!**/node_modules/**' # Search for 'lifecycle' in GraphQL fragments or queries echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' in GraphQL files:" rg --type graphql 'lifecycle' -g '!**/node_modules/**'Length of output: 487
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential client-side usage of the old 'lifecycle' structure # Search for 'lifecycle' usage in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' usage in TS/JS files:" rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -t web 'lifecycle\s*[\{\[]' -g '!**/node_modules/**' # Search for 'lifecycle' in GraphQL fragments or queries echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' in GraphQL files:" rg 'lifecycle' -g '**/*.{graphql,gql}' -g '!**/node_modules/**'Length of output: 370
src/domain/community/invitations/InvitationStateEventMutation.graphql (1)
1-6
: Approved: Simplified mutation structure, but verify client-side impact.The changes to this GraphQL mutation look good. The response structure has been simplified by removing the
lifecycle
field and promotingnextEvents
andstate
to the top level. This aligns with the PR objectives of streamlining data handling.However, it's important to note that this change might affect client-side code that previously relied on the
lifecycle
field.To ensure that all calls to this mutation have been updated accordingly, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Additional Verification Required: Update search for 'lifecycle' references in GraphQL files.
Please run the following updated script to search for 'lifecycle' references in GraphQL files using the appropriate method:
Approved: Simplified mutation structure with no remaining references to 'lifecycle'.
The changes to the
InvitationStateEvent
GraphQL mutation have been successfully verified. The response structure has been simplified by removing thelifecycle
field and promotingnextEvents
andstate
to the top level. No references to the removedlifecycle
field were found in the codebase, ensuring that client-side code is not affected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the removed 'lifecycle' field in relation to the InvitationStateEvent mutation # Search for references to 'lifecycle' in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' references in TS/JS files:" rg --type ts --type js 'InvitationStateEvent.*lifecycle' -C 3 # Search for references to 'lifecycle' in GraphQL files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' references in GraphQL files:" rg --type graphql 'InvitationStateEvent.*lifecycle' -C 3 # Note: If any results are returned, they may need to be updated to reflect the new structure.Length of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the removed 'lifecycle' field in relation to the InvitationStateEvent mutation # Search for references to 'lifecycle' in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' references in TS/JS files:" rg --type ts --type js 'InvitationStateEvent.*lifecycle' -C 3 # Search for references to 'lifecycle' in GraphQL files echo "Searching for 'lifecycle' references in GraphQL files:" rg --glob '*.graphql' 'InvitationStateEvent.*lifecycle' -C 3 # Note: If any results are returned, they may need to be updated to reflect the new structure.Length of output: 372
.build/docker/.env.base (1)
5-5
: LGTM: New collaboration path variable addedThe new
VITE_APP_COLLAB_PATH
variable has been correctly added with the appropriate Socket.IO endpoint. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating the lifecycle API as part of the move to XState 5.src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/InvitationItem.ts (1)
18-18
: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The simplification of the
invitation
object structure by makingstate
a direct property is a good improvement. It reduces nesting and makes the code more straightforward.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
invitation.lifecycle.state
:If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use
invitation.state
directly.src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/newMemberships/NewMemberships.graphql (2)
10-11
: Approved: Simplified structure inapplication
objectThe removal of the
lifecycle
field and the direct inclusion of thestate
field in theapplication
object is a good change. This simplification:
- Reduces nesting, improving query efficiency.
- Enhances readability of the GraphQL schema.
- Maintains the necessary state information while removing redundant structure.
These changes align well with GraphQL best practices by keeping the schema lean and focused.
Line range hint
1-43
: Overall: Well-structured and consistent GraphQL schema changesThe modifications in this file demonstrate a consistent approach to simplifying the GraphQL schema. By removing the
lifecycle
field and promoting thestate
field to the top level in bothapplication
andinvitation
objects, the schema becomes more streamlined and easier to work with.Key points:
- Consistency: Changes are applied uniformly across different objects.
- Simplification: Reduced nesting improves query efficiency and readability.
- Maintainability: The simplified structure will be easier to maintain and extend in the future.
These changes adhere to GraphQL best practices and should result in a more efficient and developer-friendly schema. Great job on maintaining consistency and improving the overall structure!
src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/adminGlobalOrganizationsList.graphql (2)
46-47
: LGTM. Ensure client-side handling is updated.The simplification of the
eventOnOrganizationVerification
response structure is a positive change that can lead to more straightforward data handling on the client side. The removal of thelifecycle
wrapper and promotion ofnextEvents
andstate
to the top level is consistent with the changes made in the query.Please run the following script to check for any usage of
eventOnOrganizationVerification.lifecycle
in the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of eventOnOrganizationVerification.lifecycle in the codebase # Test: Search for usage of eventOnOrganizationVerification.lifecycle rg --type typescript --type javascript 'eventOnOrganizationVerification\.lifecycle'If the script returns any results, those areas will need to be updated to work with the new structure. Ensure that all client-side code handling this mutation response is updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 49-49
22-22
: LGTM. Verify impact of removinglifecycle.id
.The simplification of the
verification
field structure is a good change that can lead to more efficient data transfer and easier frontend handling. However, it's important to ensure that removinglifecycle.id
doesn't break any existing functionality.Please run the following script to check for any usage of
verification.lifecycle.id
in the codebase:If the script returns any results, those areas may need to be updated to work with the new structure.
✅ Verification successful
Verified Removal of
verification.lifecycle.id
.The field
verification.lifecycle.id
does not appear to be used anywhere in the codebase, ensuring that its removal will not affect existing functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of verification.lifecycle.id in the codebase # Test: Search for usage of verification.lifecycle.id rg --type typescript --type javascript 'verification\.lifecycle\.id'Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of verification.lifecycle.id in the codebase # Test: Search for usage of verification.lifecycle.id in JavaScript and TypeScript files rg 'verification\.lifecycle\.id' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js'Length of output: 62
src/domain/access/RoleSet/graphql/queries/RoleSetApplicationsInvitations.graphql (3)
21-22
: Approved: Simplified data structure in AdminCommunityApplication fragmentThe removal of the
lifecycle
field and direct inclusion ofstate
andnextEvents
fields simplifies the data structure. This change reduces nesting and maintains the necessary information, which can lead to easier data handling on the client side.
40-41
: Approved: Consistent simplification in AdminCommunityInvitation fragmentThe changes in this fragment mirror those made in the AdminCommunityApplication fragment, maintaining consistency across the GraphQL schema. The direct inclusion of
state
andnextEvents
fields simplifies the data structure without loss of information.
Line range hint
1-72
: Overall: Improved GraphQL schema with simplified data structureThe changes in this file consistently simplify the data structure across fragments by removing the nested
lifecycle
object and directly includingstate
andnextEvents
fields. This modification:
- Reduces data complexity without loss of information.
- Potentially improves performance by reducing the amount of nested data.
- Maintains query optimization by fetching only necessary data.
- Adheres to GraphQL best practices by keeping the schema clean and straightforward.
These changes should lead to easier data handling on the client side and maintain good GraphQL schema design.
src/domain/community/user/hooks/useUserMetadataWrapper.ts (1)
21-21
: Verify the impact of flattening theapplication
structureThe change from
application.lifecycle.state
toapplication.state
simplifies the interface structure, which can improve readability. However, this is a breaking change that will require updates in any code that previously accessedapplication.lifecycle.state
.To ensure this change is applied consistently and doesn't introduce bugs, please run the following script:
Please review the script output to ensure:
- There are no remaining uses of
application.lifecycle.state
.- The new
application.state
is used consistently.- GraphQL queries and mutations are updated to reflect this change.
Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this structural change, especially if it's part of a larger refactoring effort or API change. This will help maintain context for future developers.
src/domain/community/application/dialogs/ApplicationDialog.tsx (1)
124-124
: LGTM: Simplified access to nextEvents.The change correctly reflects the updated type definition, simplifying the access to
nextEvents
. This improves code readability and maintains consistency with the type changes.src/domain/community/contributor/organization/adminOrganizations/useAdminGlobalOrganizationsList.ts (1)
152-152
: LGTM! The change is consistent and correct.The modification to access the verification state directly from
verification.state
is correct and consistent with the updated data structure. This change aligns with the previous modification and maintains the overall functionality of the code.src/domain/community/application/containers/ApplicationButtonContainer.tsx (2)
181-181
: LGTM! Ensure comprehensive testing of application flow.This change is consistent with the previous modification, removing the
lifecycle
property from the parent application state as well. This consistency is good for maintaining a uniform data structure throughout the application.To ensure the application flow remains intact after these changes, please:
- Test the entire application process, including both user and parent applications.
- Verify that all UI components correctly display the application states.
- Check that any state transitions work as expected.
You can use the following script to identify components that might be affected by this change:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find components that use application state # Test: Search for components using 'applicationState' or 'parentApplicationState' rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' --type web '(applicationState|parentApplicationState)'Review the components returned by this script to ensure they're compatible with the new state structure.
179-179
: LGTM! Verify impact on other components.The change from
userApplication?.application.lifecycle.state
touserApplication?.application.state
looks good and aligns with the simplification of the state management structure. This flattening of the data structure can improve code readability and maintainability.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
lifecycle.state
in the codebase:If the script returns any results, those occurrences may need to be updated to maintain consistency with this change.
✅ Verification successful
Verified!
The search for
'lifecycle.state'
returned no matches, confirming that the refactoring has successfully removed all instances of'lifecycle.state'
. The change can be considered safe and complete.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usage of 'lifecycle.state' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'lifecycle.state' in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' --type web 'lifecycle\.state'Length of output: 2573
src/domain/journey/subspace/pages/AdminSubspaceCommunityPage.tsx (3)
79-80
: LGTM: Simplified state access aligns with refactoring.The change from
application.lifecycle.state
toapplication.state
aligns with the broader refactoring effort mentioned in the AI summary. This simplification improves code readability and maintains the intended functionality.
86-87
: LGTM: Consistent simplification of state access.This change from
invitation.lifecycle.state
toinvitation.state
is consistent with the previous modification and the overall refactoring effort. It further simplifies the code and maintains a uniform approach to accessing state across different objects.
Line range hint
1-231
: Summary: Focused changes improve consistency and simplify state access.The modifications in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to simplify state access by removing the
lifecycle
field. These changes are minimal, focused, and consistent. They improve code readability without altering the component's functionality. The rest of the file remains unchanged, which is appropriate given the targeted nature of these modifications.src/domain/journey/space/pages/AdminSpaceCommunityPage.tsx (3)
79-80
: LGTM: Data structure simplificationThe changes here are in line with the expected modifications mentioned in the AI-generated summary. The removal of the
lifecycle
field and direct access to thestate
property simplifies the data structure while maintaining the same functionality. This change improves code readability and reduces nesting.
86-87
: LGTM: Consistent data structure simplificationThe changes here mirror those made to the applications filtering, demonstrating consistency in the refactoring approach. The direct access to the
state
property simplifies the data structure while maintaining the same functionality. This consistent application of changes across both applications and invitations improves overall code coherence and maintainability.
Line range hint
1-287
: Verify consistent application of data structure changesThe changes made to simplify the data structure by removing the
lifecycle
field are correct and consistent within this file. However, it would be beneficial to verify that this refactoring has been applied consistently across the entire codebase, especially in components that interact with the same data structures.To ensure consistency, you can run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
lifecycle.state
in TypeScript and JavaScript files:This will help identify any places where the refactoring might have been missed, ensuring a consistent application of the new data structure throughout the project.
src/domain/community/community/CommunityAdmin/CommunityApplications.tsx (4)
Line range hint
95-106
: LGTM: State formatting updated correctly.The
formatState
function has been successfully updated to use the newstate
property instead oflifecycle.state
. The switch statements have been adjusted accordingly, maintaining the existing logic while adapting to the new data structure.
191-191
: LGTM, but clarification needed.The
CreatePendingMembershipForPlatformInvitation
function has been updated to includenextEvents
, which is consistent with the new type definition. However, it's not clear whynextEvents
is always set to an empty array for platform invitations.Could you please clarify if this is intentional? If platform invitations don't have next events, consider adding a comment explaining this behavior.
280-280
: LGTM: Filter condition updated correctly.The
visibleTableItems
useMemo hook has been successfully updated to useitem.state
instead ofitem.lifecycle?.state
. This change is consistent with the new data structure and maintains the existing filtering logic.
Line range hint
284-297
: LGTM: State handling in delete functionality updated correctly.The
handleDeleteItem
function and the related rendering logic have been successfully updated to useitem.state
instead ofitem.lifecycle.state
. The switch statements and conditional checks have been adjusted accordingly, maintaining the existing logic while adapting to the new data structure.Also applies to: 319-319, 322-325
Client appears to be fully working.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation