Added Erlang/misultin framework #1849
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
Curious as to why this ran the gamut* on travis tests while the mochiweb one did not. However, both erlang frameworks pass travis. |
|
misultin tests passed; LGTM! |
msmith-techempower
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2016
Added Erlang/misultin framework
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I will be adding the 3 frameworks from #938 over time, as I fix them to meet the correct structure. This is the misultin framework. Passes all tests locally for plaintext and json. It seems there are issues with db connections for all the erlang frameworks so I will look into that as well, while updating these.