Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updated tagtemplate and app.module #2976

Conversation

IITI-tushar
Copy link
Contributor

@IITI-tushar IITI-tushar commented Dec 27, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring

Issue Number:
#2906
Fixes #2906

Did you add tests for your changes?

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new CSS class for improved styling of the name field in the tag template.
    • Updated the tag template to use modular CSS for styling instead of inline styles.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated properties related to positioning and styling in the tag template.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring CSS styles for the tagTemplate component by moving inline styles to the global app.module.css file. This change involves removing specific styling properties from the tagTemplate.ts file and introducing a new CSS class .tag-template-name in the app.module.css file. The modification aligns with the goal of centralizing CSS styles and improving the application's styling approach.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts Imported CSS styles and replaced inline styling with a CSS class reference. Updated name property to use className.
src/style/app.module.css Added new .tag-template-name class with specific styling properties.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Move embedded CSS to global file [#2906]
Remove all embedded CSS in the file [#2906]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Styles dancing free, no more inline glee
CSS classes leap with might
From tagTemplate to global light
A rabbit's code refactor, oh so bright! 🎨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d448f80 and b1cce1c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/style/app.module.css
  • src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

419-431: Consider using CSS variables or a global scheme for color consistency.

You’ve defined a static hex color #08780b here. For better maintainability and consistency, consider defining it as a CSS variable or referencing existing color variables if they are already in use.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43f2c61 and 65395d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/CheckIn/tagTemplate.ts (2)

2-2: Good modular approach to styling.

Importing and referencing the CSS module fosters a cleaner separation of concerns and keeps styling consistent throughout the codebase.


10-10: Verify the usage of text transformations.

While switching from inline styles to a className is beneficial for maintainability, ensure that any previously applied text transformations (e.g., uppercase, letter spacing, etc.) were not unintentionally lost. If necessary, re-introduce them in the app.module.css file.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.91%. Comparing base (e73d61d) to head (b1cce1c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2976       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             33.14%   88.91%   +55.77%     
=====================================================
  Files                   299      320       +21     
  Lines                  7429     8290      +861     
  Branches               1624     1813      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2462     7371     +4909     
+ Misses                 4762      696     -4066     
- Partials                205      223       +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please update your local branch with the latest upstream. Update this PR. That should fix the failing test

@IITI-tushar IITI-tushar force-pushed the refactor-css-in-tag-Template branch from d448f80 to b1cce1c Compare December 28, 2024 04:29
@IITI-tushar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@palisadoes, the branch has been updated, and all tests have passed.
Thank you.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit c5a3000 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 28, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants