Updating packages #2862 #2951
Updating packages #2862 #2951
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to the project's configuration files, specifically the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.eslintignore(0 hunks)eslint.config.js(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .eslintignore
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- eslint.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
154-154: Explain the rationale for downgrading jest-preview.
The version of jest-preview has been downgraded from 0.3.1 to 0.2.3. This seems unusual as the PR's objective is to update packages. Could you explain why this downgrade is necessary?
178-180: LGTM: Punycode override addresses the PR objective.
The addition of the punycode override to version 2.3.0 effectively addresses the PR's objective of updating punycode-dependent packages. This ensures all nested dependencies use a consistent and secure version of punycode.
Run the following script to check for other punycode dependencies:
✅ Verification successful
Punycode override effectively manages all transitive dependencies
The verification confirms that the punycode override to version 2.3.0 is working as intended. All transitive dependencies that require punycode are now using version 2.3.0:
- eslint → ajv → uri-js → punycode@2.3.0
- vitest → jsdom → tough-cookie → punycode@2.3.0
- vitest → jsdom → whatwg-url → tr46 → punycode@2.3.0
The override successfully ensures a consistent version across all dependency paths, which helps maintain security and avoid version conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for direct or indirect punycode dependencies
npm ls punycode --json | jq '.dependencies'
Length of output: 2084
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2951 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 29.27% 88.92% +59.65%
=====================================================
Files 300 321 +21
Lines 7546 8408 +862
Branches 1646 1893 +247
=====================================================
+ Hits 2209 7477 +5268
+ Misses 5154 688 -4466
- Partials 183 243 +60 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please fix the conflicting files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.eslintignore (1)
1-1: Remove unnecessary empty line at the start of fileThe empty line at the beginning of the file is unnecessary and should be removed for consistency.
- # Contains the PDF file of the Tag as JSON string🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.eslintignore(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
.eslintignore
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.eslintignore (1)
1-10: Verify necessity of .eslintignore changes
The changes to .eslintignore appear unrelated to the PR's main objective of updating packages that rely on punycode. Please clarify if these changes are necessary for this PR or if they should be moved to a separate PR focused on documentation/linting improvements.
✅ Verification successful
Changes to .eslintignore are necessary and related to docs directory addition
The changes to .eslintignore are actually necessary as this PR introduces a new Docusaurus documentation website in the docs/ directory, as evidenced by the numerous new files being added under docs/. The changes convert the .eslintignore from a JavaScript configuration format to the standard ignore file format and add the necessary exclusion for the newly added documentation directory.
The changes are justified because:
- The PR adds a new Docusaurus documentation website (40+ new files under
docs/) - The ESLint configuration in
.eslintrc.jsonis also updated to exclude docs-related files - The format change from JS to standard ignore file format is a valid improvement
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the changes to .eslintignore are related to package updates
# Check if there are any punycode-related files in docs directory
rg -l "punycode" docs/
# Check package.json for punycode-related configurations that might need docs exclusion
jq '.dependencies,.devDependencies,.overrides | select(. != null) | keys[] | select(contains("punycode"))' package.json
Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the git diff to understand the changes made to .eslintignore
git diff HEAD^1 .eslintignore
# Check if there are any ESLint configuration changes that might be related
git diff HEAD^1 .eslintrc*
# Let's also check if there are any changes to the docs directory structure
git diff HEAD^1 --name-status | grep "^[AMD].*docs/"
Length of output: 2670
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[warning] 1-1:
File ignored by default.
|
Please make coderabbit.ai approve your changes |
changes done |
|
Please fix the conflicting files |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will Replace or update packages relying on punycode #2862
Issue Number:
#2862
Did you update for packages?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependencies
jest-preview.punycode.Chores
talawa-admin-docs/**directory.