Clarify wording about local_access "value_type" #566
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Because there is no access mode for
local_accessor
, thevalue_type
is always the same asDataT
. (The only way to get a read-onlylocal_accessor
is to use aDataT
that isconst
.)Remove a comment in the synopsis that made it appear that
value_type
might be different fromDataT
.Also change the return type of
local_accessor::get_pointer
fromDataT
tovalue_type
. Although these types are the same, it seems clearer to be consistent withaccessor::get_pointer
, where the return type isvalue_type
.