-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lodestar should pass fee market test #61
Conversation
…tory (#48) * Add common beacon chain config file * Move PRESET_BASE to top of config file * bump service start timeout from 1 to 2 min * Revert timeout change from 2 minutes to 60 sec Co-authored-by: Roberto Bayardo <bayardo@alum.mit.edu>
* Add historical sync test (#44) Asserts that the beacon node follower can sync blobs during initial-sync. This patch also refactors the test harness to accommodate dynamic nodes. * update subrepos to latest Co-authored-by: Inphi <mlaw2501@gmail.com>
… Lodestar pre-4844 test in CI
Lodestar devnet 3
Parallelize Prysm and Lodestar test suites
Fix clean
52361bc
to
ca0dffe
Compare
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | |||
.git | |||
.github | |||
node_modules | |||
**/node_modules |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this appears to be necessary to avoid copying the compiled kzg.node, which won't work if you have an OSX host, and the docker is Linux.
BlobKzgs []string `json:"blob_kzgs"` | ||
// Does Prysm call this "blob_kzgs"? That's wrong. | ||
// BlobKzgs []string `json:"blob_kzgs"` | ||
BlobKzgs []string `json:"blob_kzg_commitments"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Prysm should be updated?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup good catch, let me fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#66 will take this forward |
Updates Lodestar to head of my branch dgcoffman/lodestar#1
Fixes one issue where the Go test code expects a JSON field to be named something different than what it is in Lodestar.
Tests won't pass here until Go can talk to Lodestar's p2p method
blobs_sidecars_by_range
-- which it currently does not.