-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support releasing non-core checks #6805
Conversation
Codecov Report
|
repo_choice = ctx.obj['repo_choice'] | ||
|
||
# Signing is done by a pipeline in a separate commit | ||
if repo_choice != 'core' and not sign_only: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm probably missing some background, but why does it make sense to be able to run a make --sign-only
on extras
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--sign-only
would be used only by the signer bot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My assumption here is so that the auto-signing bot can leverage ddev directly, correct @ofek ?
Otherwise we would need a separate logic to create the signing JSON files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great 💯
Motivation
We'll need this soon