[ASCII] Update Go version to 1.21.11

[misteriaud]

Buildimages update

This PR updates the current buildimages (v34815905-ae40295e ) to v35901572-a9447181, here is the full changelog between:
DataDog/datadog-agent-buildimages@ae40295...a944718

Golang update

This PR updates the current Golang version (1.21.10) to 1.21.11.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.36%. Comparing base (1669607) to head (c32b1d1).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #26360       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   44.96%   51.36%    +6.39%     
===========================================
  Files        2353       27     -2326     
  Lines      272670     2095   -270575     
===========================================
- Hits       122606     1076   -121530     
+ Misses     140395      903   -139492     
+ Partials     9669      116     -9553     

Flag	Coverage Δ
amzn_aarch64	51.36% <ø> (+5.55%)	⬆️
centos_x86_64	51.36% <ø> (+5.64%)	⬆️
ubuntu_aarch64	51.36% <ø> (+5.54%)	⬆️
ubuntu_x86_64	51.36% <ø> (+5.55%)	⬆️
windows_amd64	44.82% <ø> (-5.99%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pr-commenter]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 31740cb4-bb47-4f0f-9aed-7ad40f7a31bf
Baseline: 1669607
Comparison: c32b1d1

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI
➖	pycheck_1000_100byte_tags	% cpu utilization	+0.50	[-4.18, +5.19]
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu	% cpu utilization	+0.15	[-2.84, +3.13]
➖	basic_py_check	% cpu utilization	+0.12	[-2.86, +3.09]
➖	otel_to_otel_logs	ingress throughput	+0.04	[-0.33, +0.41]
➖	trace_agent_json	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.20, +0.20]
➖	trace_agent_msgpack	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.00, +0.00]
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	-0.04	[-0.08, -0.01]
➖	idle	memory utilization	-1.16	[-1.20, -1.11]
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-2.06	[-2.17, -1.96]
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	-13.15	[-32.76, +6.47]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

[github-actions]

Here are potential matches of the former version:

[misteriaud]

/merge

[dd-devflow]

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 27m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!