-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade Node SDK to version supporting P4 #24
Conversation
# Conflicts: # Cargo.lock
@abizjak I believe this is ready for final review. A full check is running against testnet but there were some issues keeping it running. I'll let it at least traverse a significant portion of the chain without error before merging. |
struct DelegationSetDelegationTargetMetadata { | ||
delegator_id: DelegatorId, | ||
delegation_target: String, | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand why you don't need "Resumed" and "Interrupted" events (for contracts), but you do need these. Is that deliberate, or an omission?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment where it should be?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And still relevant?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is kind of in the right place. I still don't quite understand why those events are not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These structs are just metadata, i.e. extra information that applications/users may care about but rosetta doesn't. Filed #38 for including it later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, thanks.
Co-authored-by: Aleš Bizjak <abizjak@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
Support new protocol version.
Changes
Upgrade SDK.
Resolves #16.