Fix Issue with Pushing Levels by using PriorityTypes

[GCRA101]

NOTE: Depends on

BHoM/BHoM_Adapter#393

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #435

ETABS Toolkit now able to push objects and levels together by using priorities on top of dependencies for sorting the objects to push.

Test files

Video Demonstration - Issue
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Push%20Levels%20Issue.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=7cEacd
Video Demonstration - Solution
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:v:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Push%20Levels%20Sorted.mp4?csf=1&web=1&e=cDUbje
Json File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/sites/BHoM/_layouts/15/download.aspx?UniqueId=aa695dbddee44123b35aecc6843d658a&e=mvnMou
Grasshopper File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Test%20Script.gh?csf=1&web=1&e=Lzfzec
Etabs File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23480-AddPriorityTypesForPush/Test%20ETABS%20Model.EDB?csf=1&web=1&e=lj7JY7

Changelog

• Added class "PriorityTypes"
• Added implementation of HandlePriorities attribute for the ETABS Adapter

[IsakNaslundBh]

TO align with suggested changes in the BHoM_Adapter

Requested changes now addressed. Dismissing my request for change review

[IsakNaslundBh]

Happy with this from a code perspective now, and have dismissed my review. @Chrisshort92 Could you please assist in testing this from a functionality point of view?

[peterjamesnugent]

@HugoVanLooveren to complete a functionality review.

[HugoVanLooveren]

Tested with ETABS 21 & 19
Used BHoM Version 7.2.1.0

With 19 it all worked (opened clean ETABS file, as the example file was for 20)

With 21, the levels got pushed, however, only 1 bar got pushed.
Got this error:

1. This component failed to run properly.

• Error: Unable to cast object of type 'System.Boolean' to type 'System.Double[]'.
• Occured in BH.UI.Base.Caller.Run(List`1 inputs)
  called from BH.UI.Base.Caller.Run()
• Are you sure you have the correct type of inputs? Check their description for more details.

[HugoVanLooveren]

@GCRA101 & @peterjamesnugent
Just had a look and ETASB 21 did not work.
Dunno if that should become a new issue or something though, as the levels got pushed properly.

[bhombot-ci]

@GCRA101 just to let you know, I have provided a check-versioning result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @GCRA101 on BHoM_Adapter

[bhombot-ci]

@GCRA101 just to let you know, I have provided a check-installer result to this Pull Request as it was detected to be linked to other Pull Requests in a series. The comment which triggered this check came from @GCRA101 on BHoM_Adapter

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check core
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check versioning
• check installer

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check copyright-compliance

There are 2 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

The check versioning has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[bhombot-ci]

The check installer has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[peterjamesnugent]

@GCRA101 & @peterjamesnugent Just had a look and ETASB 21 did not work. Dunno if that should become a new issue or something though, as the levels got pushed properly.

ETABS21 is being covered in a seperate PR:

[peterjamesnugent]

Approving based on @HugoVanLooveren's review, and the issue with Etabs21 being covered in a seperate PR:
#483

[GCRA101]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci]

@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check ready-to-merge