Bump

[zheeeng]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Renamed configuration objects for clarity and improved code consistency in the pointer-lock movement feature.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The updates in the pointer-lock-movement package involve a minor version bump from 0.1.6 to 0.1.7, reflecting enhancements or fixes. A significant change in the codebase is the renaming of the option object to options, which affects how properties are accessed in the functions, ensuring a more standard naming convention across the code.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../pointer-lock-movement/package.json	Updated version from "0.1.6" to "0.1.7".
.../src/pointer-lock-movement.ts	Renamed option object to options.

Poem

🐇💻✨
In the land of code, where logic plays,
A tiny rabbit hops, making updates.
From option to options, clear and bright,
Version leaps up, to .7 from .6 light.
Celebrate we do, with a carrot crunch,
For every small change packs a mighty punch! 🥕🎉

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6435dae and 751d1f7.

Files selected for processing (2)

• packages/pointer-lock-movement/package.json (1 hunks)
• packages/pointer-lock-movement/src/pointer-lock-movement.ts (14 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• packages/pointer-lock-movement/package.json

Additional comments not posted (6)

packages/pointer-lock-movement/src/pointer-lock-movement.ts (6)

57-57: Renaming option to options is correctly implemented throughout the function.

---

57-57: Consider the implications of using the spread operator for options. It performs a shallow copy, which might lead to unintended side effects if objects within customOption are modified elsewhere.

---

89-95: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [92-104]

The logic for handling 'loop' and 'stop' behaviors based on options.loopBehavior is implemented correctly.

---

138-144: The logic for handling drag offset activation is correctly implemented, ensuring that the pointer lock is activated only when the specified conditions are met.

---

163-179: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [157-220]

The management of active and deactive states, including the use of event listeners and conditional logic based on options, is implemented robustly.

---

321-322: The cleanup logic, which removes event listeners based on the trigger type, is correctly implemented, ensuring proper cleanup to prevent memory leaks.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.