-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gateway page improvements #518
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Gateway
participant SourceChain
participant DestinationChain
User->>Gateway: Initiate Cross-Chain Transaction
Gateway->>SourceChain: Validate and Lock Funds
alt Transaction Successful
SourceChain->>DestinationChain: Execute Transaction
else Transaction Fails
Gateway->>User: Trigger Refund Mechanism
Note over Gateway: Refund via Contract or Direct EOA
end
The sequence diagram illustrates the Gateway's cross-chain transaction flow, emphasizing the critical path and the robust revert handling mechanism described in the documentation update. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@zeta-chain/fullstack please, review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)
69-75
: Consider adding implementation examples for revert handlingThe new section provides good high-level information about revert handling, but developers would benefit from concrete examples showing:
- How to specify a refund contract
- How to configure EOA refunds
Would you like me to help draft code examples for these scenarios?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)
47-49
: Verify documentation links
The added links enhance navigation, but let's ensure they're valid.
✅ Verification successful
Links are valid and correctly referenced
All three documentation files exist in the repository:
/developers/chains/evm
/developers/chains/solana
/developers/chains/bitcoin
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced documentation files exist
fd -e mdx -e md . | grep -E "developers/chains/(evm|solana|bitcoin)"
Length of output: 185
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)
69-75
: Consider adding code examples for revert handlingThe new section clearly explains the refund mechanisms, but it would be even more helpful to include code examples demonstrating:
- How to specify a contract for refunds
- How to configure direct EOA refunds
Would you like me to help generate code examples for these scenarios?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (3)
39-42
: Well-structured content with clear examples
The updated content provides clear examples of chain-specific limitations, which helps developers understand the platform's constraints better.
47-49
: Excellent cross-referencing
The addition of internal documentation links improves navigation and helps developers find related information efficiently.
Also applies to: 67-67
4-10
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance iframe accessibility and maintainability
While the Figma embed has been improved with the footer parameter, there are still some accessibility and maintainability concerns to address:
<iframe
+ title="Gateway Interface Design"
+ aria-label="Gateway interface diagram"
style={{ border: "1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.1)", marginTop: "2rem", borderRadius: "0.5rem" }}
width="800"
height="450"
src="https://embed.figma.com/design/mYXNTORUuvGVaQ01SF7h9Y/Gateway-for-Universal-Apps?node-id=0-1&embed-host=share&footer=false"
allowfullscreen
></iframe>
Consider moving the inline styles to a CSS module for better maintainability.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested ACK
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation