Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gateway page improvements #518

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024
Merged

Gateway page improvements #518

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

fadeev
Copy link
Member

@fadeev fadeev commented Dec 9, 2024

  • Added links to other docs
  • Added diagram

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an embedded Figma design for the Gateway interface.
    • Added a new section on "Revert Handling" for cross-chain operations.
  • Documentation

    • Updated text with hyperlinks for more information on EVM, Solana, and Bitcoin functionalities.
    • Minor textual adjustments for clarity and additional resources.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 23, 2024 8:48am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the gateway.mdx documentation file with enhanced content regarding the Gateway's cross-chain functionality. Key changes include the addition of a Figma design <iframe> for visual representation, the inclusion of hyperlinks for further context on EVM, Solana, and Bitcoin features, and the introduction of a new section titled "Revert Handling." This section elaborates on refund mechanisms during cross-chain operations. Minor textual adjustments were also made to improve clarity and provide additional resources.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx - Added Figma design <iframe> for visual representation
- Inserted hyperlinks for EVM, Solana, and Bitcoin features
- Created new "Revert Handling" section explaining cross-chain operation refund mechanisms
- Made minor textual refinements to improve clarity

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Gateway
    participant SourceChain
    participant DestinationChain
    
    User->>Gateway: Initiate Cross-Chain Transaction
    Gateway->>SourceChain: Validate and Lock Funds
    alt Transaction Successful
        SourceChain->>DestinationChain: Execute Transaction
    else Transaction Fails
        Gateway->>User: Trigger Refund Mechanism
        Note over Gateway: Refund via Contract or Direct EOA
    end
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the Gateway's cross-chain transaction flow, emphasizing the critical path and the robust revert handling mechanism described in the documentation update.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fadeev fadeev marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 15:07
@fadeev fadeev requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2024 15:07
@fadeev
Copy link
Member Author

fadeev commented Dec 16, 2024

@zeta-chain/fullstack please, review.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)

69-75: Consider adding implementation examples for revert handling

The new section provides good high-level information about revert handling, but developers would benefit from concrete examples showing:

  1. How to specify a refund contract
  2. How to configure EOA refunds

Would you like me to help draft code examples for these scenarios?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da4d38f and 4552342.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)

47-49: Verify documentation links

The added links enhance navigation, but let's ensure they're valid.

✅ Verification successful

Links are valid and correctly referenced

All three documentation files exist in the repository:

  • /developers/chains/evm
  • /developers/chains/solana
  • /developers/chains/bitcoin
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced documentation files exist
fd -e mdx -e md . | grep -E "developers/chains/(evm|solana|bitcoin)"

Length of output: 185

src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (1)

69-75: Consider adding code examples for revert handling

The new section clearly explains the refund mechanisms, but it would be even more helpful to include code examples demonstrating:

  1. How to specify a contract for refunds
  2. How to configure direct EOA refunds

Would you like me to help generate code examples for these scenarios?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4552342 and 0b8342d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/pages/developers/evm/gateway.mdx (3)

39-42: Well-structured content with clear examples

The updated content provides clear examples of chain-specific limitations, which helps developers understand the platform's constraints better.


47-49: Excellent cross-referencing

The addition of internal documentation links improves navigation and helps developers find related information efficiently.

Also applies to: 67-67


4-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance iframe accessibility and maintainability

While the Figma embed has been improved with the footer parameter, there are still some accessibility and maintainability concerns to address:

 <iframe
+  title="Gateway Interface Design"
+  aria-label="Gateway interface diagram"
   style={{ border: "1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.1)", marginTop: "2rem", borderRadius: "0.5rem" }}
   width="800"
   height="450"
   src="https://embed.figma.com/design/mYXNTORUuvGVaQ01SF7h9Y/Gateway-for-Universal-Apps?node-id=0-1&embed-host=share&footer=false"
   allowfullscreen
 ></iframe>

Consider moving the inline styles to a CSS module for better maintainability.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Member

@hernan-clich hernan-clich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested ACK

@fadeev fadeev merged commit 07320d7 into main Dec 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@fadeev fadeev deleted the gateway-page-improvements branch December 24, 2024 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants