-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: remove Makefile #513
Conversation
49d8bf6
to
2710d53
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Love it! Can you update the readme? After merging, we can remove our custom docker image, correct?
Some thoughts:
|
927e982
to
62800f3
Compare
62800f3
to
2baf8e2
Compare
ok, this is a simple solution to not mess with a more complex matrix, and even test one permutation with dama. Done ✅
migrations are tested in By the way, I was surprised that in The reset mode does not change the whole behavior of foundry, I don't think it deserves all this CI time!? |
2baf8e2
to
5106148
Compare
bacb4cd
to
699994c
Compare
Hey! I think this PR is almost ready (minus your future comments 😅) About the migrationsI think having ONE test (ie: I've used your technique which uses About DamaI re-added it in the matrix, I think it is important to run the tests without dama at least once with postgre and once with mysql. Moreover I think code coverage fails because we're computing it with Foundry's bundle deactivated 🤷 |
8b624f0
to
286c351
Compare
286c351
to
4dbb2fc
Compare
I'm good to go here.
Should the coverage job run the test suite 3 times (capturing/uploading a separate coverage.xml for each):
|
No description provided.