Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix duplication of images in dark mode #252

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

makotot
Copy link
Contributor

@makotot makotot commented Nov 1, 2024

Fix duplication of images in dark mode in https://velite.js.org/guide/introduction . The current CSS syntax is incorrect.

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Correct CSS syntax to prevent duplication of images in dark mode by ensuring images with '#dark' in their source are hidden in light mode.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced image visibility control based on selected themes (light/dark).
    • Defined specific brand colors for both light and dark themes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of images to ensure correct display according to the active theme.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR fixes a CSS issue where images were being duplicated in dark mode by correcting the CSS selector syntax and removing redundant rules.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Fix CSS selector syntax for dark mode image handling
  • Remove duplicate 'display: none' rule
  • Add proper CSS selector for light mode using '.light' class
  • Fix formatting of existing CSS selector
docs/.vitepress/theme/custom.css

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the custom.css file, specifically focusing on CSS variables for light and dark themes. New rules have been added to control the visibility of images based on the active theme, ensuring that images with sources ending in #dark are hidden in light mode, while existing rules for hiding images in dark mode remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/.vitepress/theme/custom.css - Defined root CSS variables for light and dark themes with specific brand colors.
- Added rules to hide images with sources ending in #dark when the light theme is active.
- Existing rules for hiding images with sources ending in #light in dark mode remain unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(docs): show wrong image in light theme #230: The changes in this PR also modify CSS rules for image visibility based on the theme, specifically addressing the display of images in light mode, which directly relates to the modifications made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • zce

Poem

In the light, the colors gleam,
Images dance, a vibrant dream.
In the dark, they take their flight,
Hiding softly from our sight.
With a flip of the theme, oh what a sight,
A world of wonders, day and night! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43299b5 and b028371.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/custom.css (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/custom.css

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @makotot - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The added .light selector is redundant with html:not(.dark). Please remove the redundant selector and just fix the duplicate display: none declaration in the original rule.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c51e7b6 and 43299b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/.vitepress/theme/custom.css (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 23 to 29
html:not(.dark) .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
display: none;
}

.light .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
display: none;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove redundant selector to fix image duplication.

The image duplication issue is likely caused by having two different selectors targeting the same condition:

  1. html:not(.dark) (non-standard approach)
  2. .light (VitePress's recommended approach)

When both selectors match, they can cause unexpected behavior during theme transitions.

Remove the non-standard selector to fix the duplication:

-html:not(.dark) .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
-  display: none;
-}
-
 .light .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
   display: none;
 }

The .light class is VitePress's official way to handle light theme styles, so we should stick to it for better compatibility and maintainability.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
html:not(.dark) .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
display: none;
}
.light .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
display: none;
}
.light .vp-doc img[src$='#dark'] {
display: none;
}

@zce zce merged commit 90b61e5 into zce:main Nov 2, 2024
1 check passed
@makotot makotot deleted the fix-dark-mode-img-duplication branch November 6, 2024 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants