allow nested contenteditables

[phiggins42]

all the tests remain passing, can add another for the case. added a random demo/ file to show the usecase.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 94.76% when pulling 72146ea on phiggins42:nested-toolbar into b6eabc9 on daviferreira:master.

[nmielnik]

Do you mind rebasing? Our dist file situation leaves something to be desired 😞

[phiggins42]

i did a make js prior to commit I thought? based on current upstream/master ... what did I miss? (and yes, I personally am opposed to maintaining dist files in repos for this very reason)

[nmielnik]

Another PR and a commit got merged into master at pretty much the exact same time you opened your PR, I'm guessing that's where the disconnect was.

Agreed, I would definitely like to explore removing the dist files as soon as we can.

[coveralls]

Changes Unknown when pulling 71db944 on phiggins42:nested-toolbar into * on daviferreira:master*.

[phiggins42]

i think i got it this time. github pattern noob, sorry for the ugh commits. was confused. +1 to figuring out how to not need to keep the dist/ files in branch (in tags makes sense, doesn't npm et al use whatever is current as the dist file? unsure). thanks for quick merge.