Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add instructions for using clp-s' array structurization feature. #429

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

gibber9809
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is a small docs update to record the existence of the array structurization feature.

This feature must be turned on by ingesting data using the --structurize-arrays flag. It can lead to higher compression ratio some of the time by avoiding dictionary pollution (and should lead to higher compression ratio most of the time after some changes to table packing). On the search side it allows users to search for structures inside of arrays using keys containing wildcards (since the array structure is recorded in the MPT), and will typically make searches inside of arrays much faster.

@gibber9809 gibber9809 requested a review from kirkrodrigues June 7, 2024 17:41
@gibber9809 gibber9809 changed the title clp-package: Update docs to add information about structured arrays clp-package: Update docs to add information about structured arrays. Jun 7, 2024
Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <2454684+kirkrodrigues@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about:

docs: Add instructions for using clp-s' array structurization feature.

@gibber9809 gibber9809 changed the title clp-package: Update docs to add information about structured arrays. docs: Add instructions for using clp-s' array structurization feature. Jun 7, 2024
@gibber9809 gibber9809 merged commit ee5d0ba into y-scope:main Jun 7, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants