-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated Orders: Scheduler #1069
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
Hey @artur-abliazimov and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 It looks like you forgot to add a changelog entry for your changes. Make sure to add a changelog entry in the 'CHANGELOG.md' file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 23
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/constants.ts (1)
1-3
: Consider enhancing the enum with additional networks and documentation.To improve maintainability and completeness, consider:
- Adding JSDoc documentation
- Including other commonly used networks
- Using
const enum
for better runtime performance- Adding readonly modifier for type safety
Here's a suggested implementation:
-export enum ChainIds { - Sepolia = 11155111, -} +/** + * Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) chain IDs for supported networks. + * @see https://chainlist.org for a complete list of chain IDs + */ +export const enum ChainIds { + // Testnets + Sepolia = 11155111, + Goerli = 5, + + // Mainnets + Ethereum = 1, + + // Add other networks as needed +} + +// Type guard to ensure chain ID values are valid +export type ChainId = `${ChainIds}`automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/pollingConfiguration.ts (1)
1-4
: LGTM! Consider adding documentation and validation.The interface structure is well-designed with appropriate types. However, consider these improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments to document valid ranges and usage guidelines
- Consider adding validation utilities to ensure safe values
Add documentation and validation like this:
+/** + * Configuration for blockchain event polling + * @property pollingBlocks - Number of blocks to poll in each iteration (recommended: 100n-1000n) + * @property pollingIntervalMsec - Interval between polling iterations in milliseconds (recommended: 1000-5000) + */ export interface IEventPollingConfiguration { pollingBlocks: bigint; pollingIntervalMsec: number; } +/** + * Validates polling configuration + * @throws {Error} If values are outside safe ranges + */ +export function validatePollingConfig(config: IEventPollingConfiguration): void { + if (config.pollingBlocks <= 0n || config.pollingBlocks > 1000n) { + throw new Error('Polling blocks should be between 1 and 1000'); + } + if (config.pollingIntervalMsec < 1000 || config.pollingIntervalMsec > 30000) { + throw new Error('Polling interval should be between 1000ms and 30000ms'); + } +}automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/configuration.ts (2)
3-4
: Add JSDoc documentation for the new configuration propertiesPlease add documentation explaining:
- The purpose and impact of
eventsCacheSize
- The format and usage of
callerPrivateKey
- Default behaviors when these optional properties are undefined
Example:
export interface IEvmConfiguration { rpcURL: string; + /** Size of the events cache. If undefined, caching is disabled */ eventsCacheSize?: number | undefined; + /** Private key for transaction signing. If undefined, read-only operations are allowed */ callerPrivateKey?: string | undefined; }
3-3
: Add validation for eventsCacheSizeConsider adding runtime validation to ensure
eventsCacheSize
is a positive number when defined.Example validation in the constructor or setter:
if (config.eventsCacheSize !== undefined && config.eventsCacheSize <= 0) { throw new Error('eventsCacheSize must be a positive number'); }automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/env.ts (1)
2-9
: Add JSDoc comments to document the environment variablesConsider adding JSDoc comments to describe:
- Purpose and expected format of each variable
- Valid ranges for numeric values
- Required format for addresses and RPC URLs
- Impact of these settings on system behavior
export interface Env { + /** EVMOS node RPC endpoint URL (e.g., https://evmos-rpc.example.com) */ EVMOS_NODE_RPC: string; + /** EVMOS registry smart contract address in hex format */ EVMOS_REGISTRY_ADDRESS: string; + /** Number of blocks to include in each polling interval */ EVMOS_EVENTS_POLLING_BLOCKS: number; + /** Block number from which to start polling events */ EVMOS_EVENTS_REGISTRY_START_POLLING_BLOCK: number; + /** Polling interval in milliseconds */ EVMOS_EVENTS_POLLING_INTERVAL_MSEC: number; + /** Private key for transaction signing (keep secure) */ EVMOS_CALLER_PRIVATE_KEY: string; + /** Number of retry attempts for failed order processing */ EVMOS_EVENTS_ORDER_RETRY_ATTEMPTS: number; + /** Maximum number of events to keep in memory cache */ EVMOS_EVENTS_CACHE_SIZE: number; ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC: string; }automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts (3)
7-7
: Add tracking and timeline for implementationThe TODO comment should be tracked properly to ensure it doesn't get lost. Consider adding a JIRA/GitHub issue reference and expected timeline.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this implementation task?
Line range hint
1-1
: Clean up unused importsThe imported clients (
EvmClient
,NewSignatureProcessor
,WardenClient
) are not being used in the current implementation.Apply this diff to remove unused imports:
-import { EvmClient, NewSignatureProcessor, WardenClient } from '@warden-automated-orders/blockchain'; import { logError } from '@warden-automated-orders/utils'; +import { logInfo } from '@warden-automated-orders/utils';
6-8
: Consider implementing feature toggles for incomplete functionalityInstead of deploying incomplete code, consider implementing feature toggles to control the rollout of this functionality in production.
Example approach:
- Add a feature flag configuration
- Implement both old and new code paths
- Control the behavior through the feature flag
- Remove old implementation once new one is stable
Would you like me to provide a code example for this approach?
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/index.ts (1)
3-7
: Consider grouping related exportsThe exports could be better organized by grouping related items together. Consider reorganizing as follows:
export { WardenClient } from './clients/warden.js'; export { EvmClient } from './clients/evm.js'; + +// Constants and Types export { ChainIds } from './types/evm/constants.js'; -export { NewSignatureProcessor } from './processors/newSignatureProcessor.js'; -export { OrderProcessor } from './processors/orderProcessor.js'; export { INewSignatureRequest } from './types/warden/newSignatureRequest.js'; export { OrderCreated, OrderRegisteredAbi } from './types/order/events.js'; + +// Processors +export { NewSignatureProcessor } from './processors/newSignatureProcessor.js'; +export { OrderProcessor } from './processors/orderProcessor.js';automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/package.json (1)
18-18
: Consider pinning the lru-cache version for better reproducibilityWhile
^11.0.2
allows for automatic minor updates, this could lead to inconsistent builds across environments. Consider pinning the exact version for better reproducibility.- "lru-cache": "^11.0.2", + "lru-cache": "11.0.2",automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/events.ts (2)
3-8
: Consider using a more specific type for Ethereum addressesWhile using
string
type for Ethereum addresses works, consider using a more specific type likeAddress
from web3.js for better type safety and validation.export interface OrderCreated extends EventLog { returnValues: { - creator: string; - execution: string; + creator: Address; + execution: Address; }; }
1-18
: Consider adding runtime validation for Ethereum addressesWhen handling blockchain events, it's crucial to validate address formats to prevent processing invalid data. Consider adding runtime validation using web3.js utilities like
web3.utils.isAddress()
when processing these events.automated-orders/README.md (2)
11-15
: Review polling configuration valuesThe polling configuration shows:
- Start block: 7055543
- Interval: 100ms
- Block range: 1000
- Cache size: 1000000
- Retry attempts: 3
These values seem reasonable but might need adjustment based on network characteristics:
- 100ms interval might be too aggressive for some networks
- 1000 blocks per poll could potentially cause memory issues
- Cache size of 1M entries could consume significant memory
Consider documenting the rationale for these values and their resource implications.
Line range hint
1-24
: Documentation structure needs improvementSeveral documentation issues need attention:
- The relayer section is empty but still present
- Missing descriptions for each environment variable
- No information about required vs optional variables
- No explanation of the relationship between scheduler and relayer components
Consider restructuring the documentation to:
- Remove empty sections or mark them as "Coming soon"
- Add descriptions for each variable
- Indicate which variables are required
- Explain the component architecture
automated-orders/Dockerfile (3)
16-22
: Add security measures and health check for the scheduler serviceThe scheduler service could benefit from additional security measures and monitoring capabilities.
FROM base AS scheduler +# Create non-root user +RUN addgroup --system --gid 1001 nodejs && \ + adduser --system --uid 1001 nodejs + COPY ./packages/scheduler packages/scheduler COPY --from=libs ["/app/packages", "./packages"] RUN yarn install --frozen-lockfile RUN yarn build:scheduler RUN rm -rf packages/*/src packages/*/node_modules packages/*/tsconfig* + +# Switch to non-root user +USER nodejs + +# Add health check +HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \ + CMD curl -f http://localhost:${PORT:-3000}/health || exit 1 + CMD ["yarn", "scheduler"]
24-30
: Apply the same security measures and health check to the relayer serviceThe relayer service should implement the same security best practices as suggested for the scheduler.
FROM base AS relayer +# Create non-root user +RUN addgroup --system --gid 1001 nodejs && \ + adduser --system --uid 1001 nodejs + COPY ./packages/relayer packages/relayer COPY --from=libs ["/app/packages", "./packages"] RUN yarn install --frozen-lockfile RUN yarn build:relayer RUN rm -rf packages/*/src packages/*/node_modules packages/*/tsconfig* + +# Switch to non-root user +USER nodejs + +# Add health check +HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \ + CMD curl -f http://localhost:${PORT:-3000}/health || exit 1 + CMD ["yarn", "relayer"]
1-30
: Consider splitting services into separate DockerfilesCurrently, both services (scheduler and relayer) are built in the same Dockerfile. This approach might not be optimal for CI/CD pipelines as it:
- Builds both services even when only one needs to be updated
- Creates larger build contexts
- Makes it harder to maintain service-specific build configurations
Consider splitting into separate Dockerfiles for each service while sharing a common base image for the libraries.
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/config.ts (1)
19-26
: Consider grouping related configuration properties.The EVMOS properties could be organized into logical groups using a nested structure. This would improve maintainability and make the configuration more self-documenting.
Example restructuring:
properties: { evmos: { type: 'object', required: ['node', 'registry', 'events', 'auth'], properties: { node: { type: 'object', required: ['rpc'], properties: { rpc: { type: 'string' } } }, registry: { type: 'object', required: ['address'], properties: { address: { type: 'string' } } }, events: { type: 'object', required: ['pollingBlocks', 'startPollingBlock', 'pollingIntervalMsec', 'retryAttempts', 'cacheSize'], properties: { pollingBlocks: { type: 'number', minimum: 1 }, startPollingBlock: { type: 'number', minimum: 0 }, pollingIntervalMsec: { type: 'number', minimum: 1000 }, retryAttempts: { type: 'number', minimum: 1 }, cacheSize: { type: 'number', minimum: 1 } } }, auth: { type: 'object', required: ['callerPrivateKey'], properties: { callerPrivateKey: { type: 'string' } } } } } }automated-orders/package.json (2)
15-17
: Consider parallel builds for independent librariesThe current sequential build process (
build:libs
) is safe but could be optimized if the libraries are independent. If there are no dependencies between utils and blockchain-lib, consider using concurrent builds.- "build:libs": "yarn build:utils && yarn build:blockchain-lib", + "build:libs": "yarn concurrently \"yarn build:utils\" \"yarn build:blockchain-lib\"",Note: This would require adding
concurrently
as a dev dependency.
20-21
: Consider adding development-specific start scriptsThe current start scripts are good for production, but development workflows might benefit from additional features like watching for changes.
"scheduler": "yarn workspace @warden-automated-orders/scheduler start", + "scheduler:dev": "yarn workspace @warden-automated-orders/scheduler start:dev", "relayer": "yarn workspace @warden-automated-orders/relayer start" + "relayer:dev": "yarn workspace @warden-automated-orders/relayer start:dev"automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/functions.ts (2)
1-9
: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.The interface structure correctly represents blockchain execution data with appropriate types. However, adding JSDoc documentation would improve code maintainability.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Interface representing blockchain execution data + * @property caller - The address initiating the execution + * @property to - The target address for execution + * @property chainId - The blockchain network identifier + * @property data - The execution payload + * @property value - The amount of native currency to send + */ export interface IExecutionData {
80-118
: Consider adding runtime validation for gas parameters.The ABI correctly defines parameters for both legacy and EIP-1559 transactions. However, consider adding runtime validation to ensure:
maxFeePerGas
≥maxPriorityFeePerGas
- When using
gasPrice
,maxFeePerGas
andmaxPriorityFeePerGas
should be undefined (and vice versa)Would you like me to help implement the validation logic?
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts (1)
35-35
: Simplify 'await Promise.all([processor])' to 'await processor'Since only a single promise is being awaited, you can simplify the code by directly awaiting the promise instead of using
Promise.all
.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- await Promise.all([processor]); + await processor;automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts (2)
18-18
: Consider using aSet<bigint>
instead ofMap<bigint, undefined>
forsupportedChainIds
Since
supportedChainIds
only utilizes the keys to represent supported chain IDs without associated values, using aSet<bigint>
would be more appropriate. This change can enhance clarity and simplify the code.Apply this diff to update the data structure:
- private supportedChainIds: Map<bigint, undefined>, + private supportedChainIds: Set<bigint>,And adjust the check in line 69:
- if (!this.supportedChainIds.has(orderDetails.chainId)) { + if (!this.supportedChainIds.has(orderDetails.chainId)) {
69-72
: Align logging levels for consistencyThe logging level for an unsupported chain ID is set to
logError
, whereas similar checks uselogWarning
. For consistency and to reflect that this is a handled condition, consider changinglogError
tologWarning
.Apply this diff to modify the logging level:
- logError(`Chain id = ${orderDetails.chainId} is not supported`); + logWarning(`Chain id = ${orderDetails.chainId} is not supported`);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
automated-orders/yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
automated-orders/Dockerfile
(1 hunks)automated-orders/README.md
(1 hunks)automated-orders/package.json
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/package.json
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/warden.ts
(0 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/configuration.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/constants.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/pollingConfiguration.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/events.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/functions.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/config.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/env.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/warden.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
automated-orders/README.md (1)
Pattern **/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
🔇 Additional comments (18)
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/constants.ts (1)
1-3
: LGTM! The Sepolia chain ID is correctly defined.
The implementation correctly defines the Sepolia testnet chain ID (11155111).
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/env.ts (1)
7-7
:
The EVMOS_CALLER_PRIVATE_KEY
environment variable will contain sensitive data. Ensure that:
- The private key is never logged or exposed in error messages
- The value is stored securely in production environments
- Access to this value is restricted to necessary services only
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/index.ts (2)
7-7
: Verify OrderCreated event structure compatibility
Since this is part of an automated order system, we should ensure the OrderCreated event structure matches the smart contract events.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find and compare OrderCreated event definitions
# Look for smart contract event definitions
echo "Checking smart contract OrderCreated event definition..."
rg -t sol "event OrderCreated" -A 5
# Compare with TypeScript interface
echo "Checking TypeScript OrderCreated interface..."
rg -t ts "interface OrderCreated" -A 5
3-3
: Verify the existence of newly exported entities
The new exports seem well-organized and follow the existing pattern. Let's verify that all referenced files and entities exist in the codebase.
Also applies to: 5-5, 7-7
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/package.json (1)
18-18
: Verify lru-cache compatibility with Node.js version
Let's verify the compatibility of lru-cache v11 with the Node.js version used in your Docker build environment.
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/events.ts (1)
1-1
: LGTM: Appropriate imports from web3 library
The imports are correctly specified and all imported types are utilized in the code.
automated-orders/README.md (2)
8-16
: Verify the accuracy of network configurations
The RPC endpoints are using localhost with different ports:
- Ethereum: localhost:1133
- EVMOS: localhost:1122
This might lead to confusion as typically development environments would use consistent ports for similar services.
10-10
: Zero address used for registry - verify if this is intentional
The EVMOS registry address is set to the zero address (0x000...000). This is commonly used as a placeholder but could cause issues if deployed to production.
Please confirm if this is intended for development only or needs to be updated with a real contract address.
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/config.ts (1)
10-12
: Verify the polling configuration values.
The polling-related settings could significantly impact system performance and resource usage. Please ensure:
EVMOS_EVENTS_POLLING_BLOCKS
is set to a reasonable range to prevent excessive memory usageEVMOS_EVENTS_POLLING_INTERVAL_MSEC
is not too aggressive to avoid rate limiting
automated-orders/package.json (2)
14-14
: LGTM: Lint configuration is well structured
The lint script follows best practices by explicitly targeting TypeScript files and using a dedicated ignore file.
18-19
: Verify service build dependencies
Let's ensure the service builds have proper dependency handling.
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/functions.ts (2)
11-23
: LGTM! ABI correctly defines view function.
The ABI fragment properly defines a read-only function for execution validation.
39-78
:
Review stateMutability and verify struct alignment.
The ABI structure correctly maps to IExecutionData
, but has two concerns:
- Similar to
isExecuted
, this appears to be a data retrieval function and should beview
instead ofnonpayable
- We should verify the struct alignment with the smart contract
Apply this fix:
],
- stateMutability: 'nonpayable',
+ stateMutability: 'view',
};
Let's verify the struct alignment:
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts (4)
1-4
: Import statements and configuration setup are correctly implemented
The imported modules and configuration are properly set up.
7-11
: Initialization of 'evmos' client is correctly configured
The EvmClient
for Evmos is instantiated with the necessary configuration parameters.
16-16
: Verify the use of 'undefined' as value in 'chainIds' Map
The chainIds
map is initialized with undefined
as the value:
const chainIds = new Map([[BigInt(ChainIds.Sepolia), undefined]]);
Please verify if this is intentional or if a valid value should be provided.
18-33
: OrderProcessor initialization appears correctly configured
The OrderProcessor
is instantiated with the appropriate parameters, and the event polling is correctly set up.
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts (1)
94-98
: Review retry logic when order execution fails
When executed
is false
, the function logs an error and returns true
, ceasing further retries. Assess whether it's appropriate to stop retrying at this point or if additional attempts should be made, especially if the failure might be due to transient issues.
Please verify if the failure is recoverable and determine if implementing a retry mechanism here would enhance reliability.
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/evm/configuration.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts (1)
4-4
: Add documentation about migration statusThe TODO message doesn't provide context about the migration of functionality to the scheduler package. Consider adding a more descriptive comment explaining:
- Why the implementation was removed
- Where the functionality was moved to
- Future plans for this relayer package
Here's a suggested improvement:
- logInfo('todo: implementation'); + logInfo('Implementation pending: Functionality temporarily moved to @warden-automated-orders/scheduler package as part of service reorganization');automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/processor.ts (1)
11-11
: Consider enhancing error handling capabilitiesThe simplified processing approach removes the built-in retry mechanism. While this promotes cleaner separation of concerns, it requires careful error handling implementation in subclasses.
Consider:
- Defining standard error types for common failure scenarios
- Providing helper methods for common retry patterns
- Adding documentation about error handling expectations for subclasses
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts (2)
18-33
: Consider architectural improvements for the OrderProcessor setupThe current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Complex initialization could benefit from a builder pattern
- Missing graceful shutdown handling
- Hard-coded polling configuration might need runtime adjustments
Consider implementing a builder pattern and graceful shutdown:
class OrderProcessorBuilder { private evmos: EvmClient; private ethereum: EvmClient; // ... other fields public withEvmosClient(client: EvmClient): OrderProcessorBuilder { this.evmos = client; return this; } // ... other builder methods public build(): OrderProcessor { // Validation logic here return new OrderProcessor(/*...*/); } }Also, consider implementing graceful shutdown:
const shutdown = async () => { await processor.stop(); process.exit(0); }; process.on('SIGTERM', shutdown); process.on('SIGINT', shutdown);
Line range hint
35-42
: Optimize execution flow and cleanup handlingThe current execution flow has several issues:
- Unnecessary
Promise.all
for a single promise- Multiple
process.exit
calls- Missing cleanup of resources
Apply this improvement:
- await Promise.all([processor]); + await processor; main() .catch((e) => { logError(e); + // Cleanup resources + await processor.stop(); process.exit(1); }) - .finally(() => process.exit()); + .finally(async () => { + // Cleanup resources + await processor.stop(); + process.exit(0); + });automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts (1)
49-57
: Optimize block range calculation for better readabilityThe block range calculation can be simplified using Math.min for better clarity.
- if (fromBlock + config.pollingBlocks > endBlock) { - toBlock = endBlock; - } else { - toBlock = fromBlock + config.pollingBlocks; - } + toBlock = BigInt(Math.min( + Number(fromBlock + config.pollingBlocks), + Number(endBlock) + ));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/processor.ts
(2 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/events.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/functions.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/registry/events.ts
(0 hunks)automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/config.ts
(1 hunks)automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/registry/events.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/index.ts
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/events.ts
- automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/types/order/functions.ts
🔇 Additional comments (9)
automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts (2)
1-1
: LGTM: Imports are clean and minimal
The imports are correctly scoped to just the logging utilities needed for the current implementation.
3-5
: Verify complete migration of functionality
Let's ensure all previous functionality has been properly migrated to the scheduler package.
✅ Verification successful
Migration verification complete - functionality has been properly transferred
Based on the git history and current implementation, I can confirm that the functionality has been successfully migrated from the relayer to the scheduler package:
- The old relayer implementation used
WardenClient
,EvmClient
, andNewSignatureProcessor
for signature processing - The new scheduler implementation now handles order processing with similar components (
EvmClient
,OrderProcessor
) but with updated architecture for order registration and execution - The relayer's index.ts has been intentionally simplified to a placeholder, indicating the successful transfer of responsibilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all critical functionality from the relayer has been migrated to the scheduler
# Check for key classes/interfaces in scheduler
echo "Checking for migrated components in scheduler package..."
rg -l "WardenClient|EvmClient|NewSignatureProcessor" "automated-orders/packages/scheduler"
# Check for any remaining references to the relayer implementation
echo "Checking for any remaining references to relayer..."
rg -l "from '@warden-automated-orders/relayer'" "automated-orders/packages"
Length of output: 457
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files and look for specific functionality
# Check the content of scheduler's index.ts to see what functionality exists
echo "=== Scheduler's index.ts content ==="
cat automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts
# Check for any implementation files in relayer (current and historical)
echo -e "\n=== Files in relayer package ==="
fd . automated-orders/packages/relayer/src
# Look for any implementation details in git history
echo -e "\n=== Git history for relayer implementation ==="
git log -p automated-orders/packages/relayer/src/index.ts
Length of output: 8781
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/processor.ts (1)
21-21
: Verify consistent implementation across processor subclasses
The change from Promise<boolean>
to Promise<void>
return type requires verification of proper error handling in all implementing classes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to gather the necessary information.
Let me check the error handling patterns in these implementations more specifically.
Error handling is properly implemented in processor subclasses
Both implementing classes (OrderProcessor
and NewSignatureProcessor
) have appropriate error handling patterns:
NewSignatureProcessor
uses try-catch with proper error loggingOrderProcessor
has comprehensive error handling with try-catch blocks and proper validation checks
The change from Promise<boolean>
to Promise<void>
is safely implemented across all processor subclasses, with no issues in error handling patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all processor implementations and verify their error handling patterns
# Find all processor implementations
echo "Searching for Processor implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Processor' -f automated-orders
# Check error handling patterns in handle methods
echo "Checking error handling in handle methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Processor {
$$$
async handle($_) {
try {
$$$
} catch $_
}
}'
Length of output: 561
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for processor implementations
echo "Searching for Processor implementations..."
rg "extends\s+Processor" -l
# Check handle method implementations
echo -e "\nHandle method implementations:"
rg "handle\s*\([^)]*\)\s*:\s*Promise\s*<" -A 5
Length of output: 1956
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get full implementation of both processor classes
echo "OrderProcessor implementation:"
rg "class OrderProcessor" -A 50 automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/orderProcessor.ts
echo -e "\nNewSignatureProcessor implementation:"
rg "class NewSignatureProcessor" -A 50 automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts
Length of output: 2380
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts (1)
15-15
: LGTM: Return type change is appropriate
The change from Promise<boolean>
to Promise<void>
aligns well with the processor pattern where success/failure is handled through error propagation rather than boolean returns.
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/config/config.ts (1)
7-17
: Verify Ethereum configuration requirements
ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC
is marked as required, but other Ethereum-related properties (e.g., ETHEREUM_REGISTRY_ADDRESS
) are not defined. This might indicate incomplete Ethereum configuration.
✅ Verification successful
ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC
is correctly required and sufficient for current usage
The verification shows that ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC
is the only Ethereum-related configuration needed in the scheduler package. It's used solely for RPC URL initialization in index.ts
. No other Ethereum-specific configurations (including ETHEREUM_REGISTRY_ADDRESS
) are required for the scheduler's functionality, making the current required configuration array correct and complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Ethereum-related configuration usage
# Expected: Find references to Ethereum configuration to confirm requirements
# Search for Ethereum configuration usage
rg -l 'ETHEREUM_[A-Z_]+' --type ts
# Search for registry address usage
rg 'ETHEREUM_REGISTRY_ADDRESS' --type ts
Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of Ethereum-related configurations in scheduler
rg -A 5 'ETHEREUM_[A-Z_]+' automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/
# Check if there are any Ethereum-related type definitions or interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
ethereum$_: $$$
$$$
}'
# Check for any Ethereum client or service initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'new $_EthereumClient($$$)'
Length of output: 1764
automated-orders/packages/scheduler/src/index.ts (2)
1-4
: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The imports are clean, well-structured, and all imported items are utilized in the code.
16-16
: Clarify chain IDs configuration and improve validation
The chain IDs configuration raises several concerns:
- The purpose of the
undefined
value in the Map is unclear - There's no validation for supported chain IDs
- Single chain support might limit scalability
Let's check if other chain IDs are defined but unused:
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/clients/evm.ts (2)
1-12
: LGTM! Well-structured imports and property declarations.
The imports and class properties are well-organized and properly typed.
14-27
: Past review comment about signer initialization is still valid.
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
rpcURL: config.ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
const chainIds = new Map([[BigInt(ChainIds.Sepolia), undefined]]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use Set here?
import { INewSignatureRequest } from '../types/warden/newSignatureRequest.js'; | ||
|
||
const { delay } = utils; | ||
const { createRPCQueryClient } = warden.ClientFactory; | ||
|
||
export class WardenClient { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not used anywhere
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/relayer.yml (1)
48-50
: Reconsider using --force flag in TypeScript build.The
--force
flag rebuilds all files regardless of what's changed, which might hide incremental build issues and increase build times unnecessarily.Consider removing the
--force
flag unless there's a specific reason for its inclusion:- run: tsc --build --force --verbose + run: tsc --build --verbose.github/workflows/scheduler.yml (1)
8-24
: Add workflow file to path filtersThe workflow's path filters don't include the workflow file itself. This means changes to the workflow configuration won't trigger a build to verify the workflow's functionality.
Add the workflow file to both push and pull_request paths:
paths: - "automated-orders/package.json" - "automated-orders/tsconfig.json" - "automated-orders/yarn.lock" - "automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/**" - "automated-orders/packages/scheduler/**" - "automated-orders/packages/utils-library/**" + - ".github/workflows/scheduler.yml"
.github/workflows/build_push.yml (1)
Line range hint
65-67
: Consider enabling strict security scanning.The Trivy scanner configuration is commented out (
# exit-code: "1"
), which means the workflow won't fail on security findings. Consider enabling strict mode for better security enforcement.with: image-ref: ${{ needs.build-and-push.outputs.image }} output: "trivy.txt" - # exit-code: "1" + exit-code: "1" severity: "CRITICAL,HIGH"Dockerfile (2)
87-98
: LGTM! Consider adding .dockerignoreThe automated-orders-libs stage follows Docker best practices:
- Uses non-root user
- Leverages build caching with proper file copying order
- Ensures reproducible builds with --frozen-lockfile
- Performs cleanup to reduce image size
Consider adding a .dockerignore file to exclude unnecessary files during COPY operations, which could further optimize build context and prevent accidental inclusion of sensitive files.
175-186
: Improve process management and monitoringWhile the build setup looks good, consider these improvements:
- Replace
CMD ["yarn", "scheduler"]
with a shell script entry point that can properly handle signals and process management- Add HEALTHCHECK instruction to enable Docker to monitor the scheduler's health
Example improvement:
+COPY --chown=node:node automated-orders/docker-entrypoint.sh /docker-entrypoint.sh +RUN chmod +x /docker-entrypoint.sh +HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \ + CMD curl -f http://localhost:${PORT:-3000}/health || exit 1 -CMD ["yarn", "scheduler"] +ENTRYPOINT ["/docker-entrypoint.sh"] +CMD ["scheduler"]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/build_push.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/relayer.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/scheduler.yml
(1 hunks)Dockerfile
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/relayer.yml (2)
52-58
: Verify required secrets for the build_push workflow.
The workflow inherits all secrets to the reusable workflow. This might expose more secrets than necessary.
Let's check what secrets are actually needed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for required secrets in the build_push workflow
# Look for secret usage in the reusable workflow
echo "Checking secret usage in build_push.yml..."
rg -l 'secrets\.' .github/workflows/build_push.yml
# Look for environment variables that might indicate required secrets
echo "Checking for environment variables in Dockerfile..."
rg -l '^\s*ARG|^\s*ENV' automated-orders/packages/relayer/Dockerfile
8-24
: Consider optimizing path patterns and verifying coverage.
The same path patterns are duplicated between push and pull_request triggers. Consider using YAML anchors to define these patterns once and reuse them.
Let's verify if all relevant files are covered by the path patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Path patterns in workflow are appropriate and complete
The current path patterns in the workflow file correctly cover all the essential files needed for the relayer service:
- Root level configuration:
package.json
,tsconfig.json
,yarn.lock
- All files in the relayer package and its dependencies (blockchain-library and utils-library)
The directory structure shows that there are no additional critical files (like Dockerfiles or environment configs) within the relayer package that need to be included in the path patterns. The suggestion to use YAML anchors would only add unnecessary complexity for this small set of paths.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potentially missing critical files in the workflow triggers
# Look for additional configuration files, build scripts, or dependencies that might affect the relayer
# Search for potential configuration files
echo "Searching for configuration files..."
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e env . automated-orders/packages/relayer/
# Search for build-related files
echo "Searching for build-related files..."
fd -e Dockerfile -e dockerignore -e sh automated-orders/packages/relayer/
# Search for any README or documentation that might contain build instructions
echo "Searching for documentation..."
fd README automated-orders/packages/relayer/
Length of output: 544
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find relevant files
echo "Checking if automated-orders directory exists..."
ls -la automated-orders/
echo -e "\nChecking structure of automated-orders/packages/relayer..."
ls -la automated-orders/packages/relayer/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Relayer directory not found"
echo -e "\nSearching for any Dockerfile in the repository..."
fd Dockerfile
echo -e "\nSearching for any config files in the repository..."
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e env
Length of output: 4724
.github/workflows/scheduler.yml (2)
52-58
: Verify the reusable workflow existence and compatibility
The job uses a reusable workflow from ./.github/workflows/build_push.yml
. Let's ensure this workflow exists and accepts the required inputs.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the reusable workflow exists and verify its interface
if [ -f .github/workflows/build_push.yml ]; then
echo "Checking build_push.yml workflow interface..."
# Look for input definitions and service_name usage
rg -A 5 "inputs:|service_name:" .github/workflows/build_push.yml
else
echo "Warning: build_push.yml workflow not found"
fi
48-50
: Reconsider using --force flag in TypeScript build
The --force
flag in the TypeScript build command forces a full rebuild by removing existing build artifacts. This could potentially mask incremental build errors and increase build times unnecessarily.
Consider removing the --force
flag unless it's specifically needed. Let's verify if there are any known TypeScript incremental build issues:
.github/workflows/build_push.yml (1)
17-18
: LGTM! Verify Dockerfile targets exist.
The addition of 'scheduler' and 'relayer' services aligns with the project's expansion. However, let's ensure the corresponding build targets exist in the Dockerfile.
✅ Verification successful
✅ Build targets for scheduler and relayer exist
The Dockerfile contains the required build targets:
FROM node-build-env AS scheduler
at line 182FROM node-build-env AS relayer
at line 197
Both targets are properly configured with their respective build and runtime configurations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that Dockerfile contains the new build targets
# Check if Dockerfile exists and contains the new targets
rg -A 5 'FROM .+ as (scheduler|relayer)' Dockerfile
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if Dockerfile exists and its location
fd Dockerfile
# Then let's examine the content of any Dockerfile to understand the build targets
fd Dockerfile --exec cat {}
Length of output: 7756
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/automated-orders-relayer.yml (1)
4-24
: Optimize path filters and add missing pathsThe path filters can be improved in several ways:
- Move common paths to the top level to avoid duplication
- Add the workflow file itself to ensure CI runs when the workflow changes
- Add GitHub Actions configuration path to catch related changes
Consider refactoring to:
on: + paths: + - ".github/workflows/automated-orders-relayer.yml" + - ".github/workflows/build_push.yml" + - "automated-orders/package.json" + - "automated-orders/tsconfig.json" + - "automated-orders/yarn.lock" + - "automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/**" + - "automated-orders/packages/relayer/**" + - "automated-orders/packages/utils-library/**" push: branches: - main - paths: - - "automated-orders/package.json" - - "automated-orders/tsconfig.json" - - "automated-orders/yarn.lock" - - "automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/**" - - "automated-orders/packages/relayer/**" - - "automated-orders/packages/utils-library/**" tags: - "automated-orders-relayer/v*" pull_request: - paths: - - "automated-orders/package.json" - - "automated-orders/tsconfig.json" - - "automated-orders/yarn.lock" - - "automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/**" - - "automated-orders/packages/relayer/**" - - "automated-orders/packages/utils-library/**".github/workflows/automated-orders-scheduler.yml (3)
2-2
: Fix trailing whitespace in workflow nameThere is a trailing space after "Scheduler" that should be removed.
-name: Automated Orders Scheduler +name: Automated Orders Scheduler🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 2-2: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
4-24
: Consider adding protection for tag pushesThe workflow triggers on any tag matching
automated-orders-scheduler/v*
. To prevent unauthorized deployments, consider restricting tag pushes to specific actors.Add
permissions
or branch protection rules to ensure only authorized users can create and push tags.
25-51
: Enhance build job reliability and securityThe build configuration looks good but could be improved:
- Consider pinning the Ubuntu runner to a specific version instead of
latest
- Add hash verification for the downloaded dependencies
- Consider adding timeouts to prevent hung builds
Example improvements:
jobs: build: - runs-on: ubuntu-latest + runs-on: ubuntu-22.04 + timeout-minutes: 15 steps: - name: Checkout uses: actions/checkout@v4 + with: + persist-credentials: false # Add yarn integrity check + - name: Verify dependencies + run: yarn check --integrity + working-directory: "automated-orders/"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/automated-orders-relayer.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/automated-orders-scheduler.yml
(1 hunks).github/workflows/build_push.yml
(1 hunks)Dockerfile
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/build_push.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/automated-orders-scheduler.yml
[error] 2-2: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/automated-orders-relayer.yml (1)
48-54
: Add deployment safeguards and environment controls
The build-and-push job could benefit from additional security measures and deployment controls:
- Add environment specification for deployment targets
- Include deployment approval gates for production
- Add version tag validation
Consider enhancing the job configuration:
build-and-push:
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' || startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/automated-orders-relayer/v')
needs: [build]
+ environment:
+ name: ${{ github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && 'staging' || 'production' }}
+ url: ${{ steps.deploy.outputs.deployment_url }}
uses: ./.github/workflows/build_push.yml
with:
service_name: automated-orders-relayer
+ version: ${{ startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') && github.ref_name || 'latest' }}
secrets: inherit
Let's verify the build_push.yml workflow configuration:
.github/workflows/automated-orders-scheduler.yml (1)
52-58
: Verify security of inherited secrets
The job inherits all secrets from the calling context using secrets: inherit
. This could potentially expose sensitive information unnecessarily.
Consider explicitly listing only the required secrets instead of inheriting all of them:
secrets:
DOCKER_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }}
DOCKER_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_PASSWORD }}
Dockerfile (2)
87-98
: LGTM: Well-structured base library stage
The stage follows Docker best practices with proper user permissions, file ownership, and build artifact cleanup.
188-199
:
Add required environment variables for relayer
The relayer service requires the following environment variables to be defined:
- ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC
- WARDEN_RPC_URL
- WARDEN_POLLING_INTERVAL_MSEC
Add the environment variables using this diff:
FROM node-build-env AS automated-orders-relayer
USER node
WORKDIR /app
+ENV ETHEREUM_NODE_RPC=""
+ENV WARDEN_RPC_URL=""
+ENV WARDEN_POLLING_INTERVAL_MSEC=""
COPY --chown=node:node automated-orders/yarn.lock yarn.lock
Additionally, as noted in a previous review, consider creating a shared base image for both scheduler and relayer stages to reduce duplication.
…n-protocol/wardenprotocol into feature/automated-orders-scheduler * 'feature/automated-orders-scheduler' of github.com:warden-protocol/wardenprotocol: fix walletconnect and snap handlers (#1055) custom kvStorage for web3wallet; add suggestion to go to chainlink to select chain (#1074) Migrate to foundry (#1040)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores