-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extension to PR 993 #995
Extension to PR 993 #995
Conversation
…991_v3_tempcolumn_adhoccsv_calibration
…991_v3_tempcolumn_adhoccsv_calibration
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #995 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.43% 78.45% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 99 99
Lines 13391 13384 -7
==========================================
- Hits 10503 10500 -3
+ Misses 2888 2884 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
sorry, commit 61bb99b was not intended for this branch, but will leave it now as it will not do any harm. |
UPDATE: I am now investigating the codecov issue in a separate branch as I realise it is not practical to have that in this branch. |
(depending on whether the timestamp column is there)
edit to PR 995, corercting temperature column location
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good!
Extends code updates in PR #993 to g.getmeta because also that function did not effectively use the temperature data from the ad-hoc csv format.
I have tested this with:
rmc.col.temp = c(),
in order to simulate not having temperatureAdditionally, I am updating the code coverage workflow file (.yml) to align with the latest template offered by https://github.com/r-lib/actions/blob/v2-branch/examples/test-coverage.yaml I do this because recently code coverage gives all kinds of redundant warnings about the test coverage dropping in certain commits. I think this is overkill for a package like GGIR. Coverage is nice to know and we will try to keep coverage high, but having these warnings with every commit is too much to worry about I think. Hopefully the new template removes this behaviour. => update: i found out that adding a codecov.yml file to root of the repo allows for configuring this behaviour.Checklist before merging:
inst/NEWS.Rd
with a user-readable summary. Please, include references to relevant issues or PR discussions.DESCRIPTION
file, if you think you made a significant contribution.