-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve non-negative-real interoperability (#943). #944
Conversation
Marking for the agenda, since as per #943 (comment) the deadline for a change like this seems to have passed, even though it is (probably) a good idea. The alternative would be to defer to 2nd Ed. |
The Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<nigel> Topic: Improve non-negative-real interoperability (#943). ttml2#944<nigel> github: https://github.com//pull/944 <nigel> Glenn: I have no problem deferring this to 2nd Ed, and note that if we do that then we <nigel> .. need to approve #956 in the meantime. <nigel> Nigel: This is about making the value "0." that is illegal in TTML1 legal by adopting xs:decimal. <nigel> .. I think we should do nothing and nobody will care. <nigel> Glenn: If we don't do it then we have to do #956. <nigel> Nigel: Any other views on this? <nigel> [group]: silence <nigel> Glenn: The reason #956 is important is that if we use xs:decimal in our schema then all <nigel> .. the tools that take the schema will make it impossible to tell if 0. was used because the <nigel> .. resulting value will be a double floating point number whose original lexical value will <nigel> .. be lost. Changing it to a string will pass that through to implementations. <nigel> Nigel: And the XSD is not normative and it is not a requirement for implementers to use it. <nigel> Glenn: Sure. <nigel> Nigel: There are no comments on this. <nigel> Glenn: I will move this issue to TTML.next. <nigel> Nigel: OK <nigel> SUMMARY: Close pull request and mark as TTML.next. |
Deferring to consideration under ttml.next. |
The pull request is missing tests to exercise the change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests at w3c/ttml2-tests#208 look good.
Closes #943.