[Content Doc] "IDL" is a little bit unclear as a title of epubReadingSystem interface #877
Labels
EPUB32
Issues from 3.0.1 resolved in the EPUB 3.2 specification
Topic-ContentDocs
The issue affects EPUB content documents
Milestone
Comments
|
What about "Interface Definition"? |
mattgarrish
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2016
#870 - clarify white space in epub:type #866 - clarify hyperlinks outside container do no get listed in manifest #855 - remove normative keyword from informative discouraged constructs #853 - separate/clarify rdfa and microdata usage and support #847 - improve media overlays purpose and scope description #844 - remove "user" as a defined term #842 - clarify meaning of element "value" as text content #834 - remove html processing model from relationship description Also include minor wording clarifications suggested as part of the content documents review in issues #880, #879, #878, #877, #876, #875, #874, #868, #867, #864, #863, #860, #857, #856, #852, #849 and a few issues reported by via the mailing list.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The title of Content Doc Appendix A.2 is "IDL".
First, it is unclear what "IDL" stands for. Second, since there are several Interface definition languages, the title "IDL" is not an appropriate title for this section.
I think the intention of this section is to specify the epubReadingSystem interface by using Web IDL, and if it is so, the section title should be "epubReadingSystem Interface" or something similar. Plan B is "Web IDL".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: