-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Navigation document without toc, page-list, or landmarks #826
Comments
The
But the other two are optional. Inclusion of |
Thanks. I looked over this sentence. I would like 5.4.2.1 Introduction to specify that toc nav is require while toc page-list and toc landmarks are optional. |
We don't make normative statements in informative sections. The most I'd offer to do for this is add the following to the toc nav description: "The toc nav is the only navigation aid that has to be included in the EPUB Navigation Document." |
Should we also recommend page-list with a reference to accessibility docs? |
We've tried not to cross-pollinate requirements to avoid them getting out of synch. If we move the recommendation into the packages spec, it also potentially becomes a warning for everyone who doesn't include. If you want it considered, though, please open a new issue. |
Proposed Solution Add the following qualification to the nav types introduction: "The toc nav is the only navigation aid that has to be included in the EPUB Navigation Document." |
Ok to leave accessibility requirements in a11y docs. |
#755 - change alt-script to alt-rep and clarify language #761 - make image cmts required when there is a viewport #773 - update roadmap and add diagram #778 - clarify package conformance #780 - generalize backwards compatibility statement #800 - clarify svg handling for fxl documents #808 - replace spaces with underscores in rootfile examples #822 - fix obsolete feature labels/descriptions #823 - add note about incomplete RS requirements for scrolled-continuous #824 - add clearer content model for nav elements #826 - note toc nav is required in intro #828 - clarify ordering requirements for toc nav references #829 - note optional use of pagebreak with page-list adds a link to the informative a11y faq; patches errata not applied to doi examples; probably some other minor stuff, too
Is the use of
<nav epub:type="toc" ...>
, or<nav epub:type="page-list" ...>
, or<nav epub:type="landmarks" ...>
required? If I am not mistaken, the current text allows a navigation document not to have any such.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: