-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
erat did method #536
erat did method #536
Conversation
hi, would it be possible for someone to review the request? |
hi, I updated the specification repository to public, could someone review this, if possible? |
Hi, please could we have some feedback on this? no reply since November. |
@msporny some feedback please |
New DID Method review volunteers, please review this DID Method. /cc @apuchitnis @stenreijers @gatemezing @esaung @michallis @richardwinputra @adam-burns @Steffytan @MizukiSonoko @rajivrajani @genaris @harleyjackthomas @ajile-in @KDean-Dolphin |
Any feedback? is there anything more that we should do, to approve this? Thank you! |
Re-ping, did:erat needs a review: @apuchitnis @stenreijers @gatemezing @esaung @michallis @richardwinputra @adam-burns @Steffytan @MizukiSonoko @rajivrajani @genaris @harleyjackthomas @ajile-in @KDean-Dolphin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DID Method meets minimum requirements (just barely) to be registered as a DID Method.
Non-blocking feedback: The specification doesn't seem to contain enough information to implement the DID Method. Please spend some time to point to documentation, software libraries, or code examples on how one could implement the DID Method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few elements are missing from the security section (https://w3c.github.io/did-core/#security-requirements) -- namely, requirements 2, 3, and 4. Ideally 9 and 10 should be completed, too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The suggested method meets minimum requirements
@apuchitnis wrote:
While that is ideal to have in a finalized DID Method specification, it is not required for registration in the registry. |
DID Method Registration
As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:
contactEmail
address [OPTIONAL].verifiableDataRegistry
entry [OPTIONAL].