Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T6291: Add bonding.py to op-mode-standardized.json #3408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2024
Merged

T6291: Add bonding.py to op-mode-standardized.json #3408

merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2024

Conversation

l0crian1
Copy link
Contributor

@l0crian1 l0crian1 commented May 4, 2024

Change Summary

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe):

Related Task(s)

https://vyos.dev/T6291

Related PR(s)

Component(s) name

data/op-mode-standardized.json

Proposed changes

Added the recent bonding.py to op-mode-standardized.json

How to test

Smoketest result

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

@sever-sever
Copy link
Member

@Mergifyio backport sagitta

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented May 4, 2024

backport sagitta

✅ Backports have been created

@sever-sever sever-sever merged commit 5570807 into vyos:current May 4, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
c-po added a commit that referenced this pull request May 4, 2024
T6291: Add bonding.py to op-mode-standardized.json (backport #3408)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants