Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge release/v1.1.0 to develop #5117

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Merge release/v1.1.0 to develop #5117

merged 24 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

voxel51-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@voxel51-bot voxel51-bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Merge release/v1.1.0 to develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced StatusButton and OperatorExecutionButton components for enhanced user interactions.
    • Added OperatorExecutionMenu for executing operators with options.
    • Implemented StatusButtonView and OperatorExecutionButtonView for improved UI representation.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced theme color palette with a new primaryMedium color.
    • Updated operator execution context to track performance metrics.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in various components and methods for better clarity and functionality.
  • Chores

    • Streamlined imports and exports for easier access to new components.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the ExecutionOptions class located in the fiftyone/operators/executor.py file. The orchestrator_registration_enabled property has been modified to consistently return False, eliminating its previous dependency on the FIFTYONE_ENABLE_ORCHESTRATOR_REGISTRATION environment variable. This adjustment simplifies the logic of the property while maintaining the overall structure and functionality of the class. Additionally, several new components related to operator execution and status buttons have been introduced across various files.

Changes

File Change Summary
fiftyone/operators/executor.py Updated orchestrator_registration_enabled property to always return False, removing dependency on environment variable.
app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/StatusButton.tsx Introduced StatusButton component with props for label, disabled state, and severity.
app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/index.ts Added export for StatusButton component for easier access.
app/packages/components/src/components/ThemeProvider/index.tsx Added primaryMedium color to the dark theme configuration.
app/packages/components/src/components/index.ts Added export for StatusButton component to the main components index.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx Introduced OperatorExecutionButtonView component for rendering execution buttons.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx Introduced StatusButtonView component for displaying status buttons based on schema.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/index.ts Added exports for OperatorExecutionButtonView and StatusButtonView.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/utils/index.ts Added StatusButtonView to NON_EDITABLE_VIEWS array to mark it as non-editable.
app/packages/embeddings/src/Embeddings.tsx Removed import of Loading component to simplify rendering logic.
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx Introduced OperatorExecutionButton component for triggering operator execution menus.
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionMenu/index.tsx Introduced OperatorExecutionMenu component for displaying execution options in a menu.
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx Introduced OperatorExecutionTrigger component for managing menu visibility and execution.
app/packages/operators/src/index.ts Added export for OperatorExecutionButton component.
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts Updated several functions to include query_performance parameter for performance tracking.
app/packages/operators/src/state.ts Introduced OperatorExecutionOption type and updated hooks for better execution management.
app/packages/operators/src/types.ts Added StatusButtonView class and updated VIEWS constant to include it.
fiftyone/operators/types.py Added StatusButtonView class for rendering status buttons with various attributes.

Possibly related PRs

  • always disable orchestrator registration #5111: This PR modifies the ExecutionOptions class to always disable orchestrator registration by changing the orchestrator_registration_enabled property to return False, which is directly related to the changes in the main PR that also involve modifications to the ExecutionOptions class.
  • StatusButton component #5105: The introduction of the StatusButton component in this PR is relevant as it may interact with the ExecutionOptions class, particularly if the status of orchestrator registration affects UI components.
  • Fix target view for clear sample/frame field operators #5122: This PR updates the ClearSampleField and ClearFrameField classes to include a new target parameter, which is relevant to the context of operator execution and may relate to the changes in the ExecutionOptions class in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • brimoor
  • imanjra

🐰 In the code where options play,
A change was made, come what may.
Orchestrator now, a steadfast friend,
Always False, no need to pretend.
Simplified logic, clear as can be,
Hopping along, we code with glee! 🎉


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f28dca and 5972024.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • fiftyone/operators/builtin.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
fiftyone/operators/builtin.py (2)

625-629: LGTM! Target parameter handling is well implemented.

The changes correctly implement the target parameter handling, allowing the clear operation to be performed on different views (dataset, current view, or selected samples) while maintaining consistency with other operations.


719-723: LGTM! Target parameter handling is consistently implemented.

The changes mirror the implementation in ClearSampleField, maintaining consistency in how frame field operations are handled across the codebase.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 11

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx (2)

7-10: Add props validation and safe defaults

While the current implementation works, it could be more robust with proper props validation and safe defaults.

Consider this improvement:

 export default function StatusButtonView(props: ViewPropsType) {
   const { schema } = props;
-  const { view = {} } = schema;
+  const { view = {} } = schema ?? {};
   const { label, on_click, params = {}, severity, disabled, title } = view;

Also consider adding runtime validation for required props:

if (!label || !on_click) {
  console.warn('StatusButtonView: label and on_click are required props');
  return null;
}

20-28: Enhance accessibility and loading state handling

The button rendering could be improved with proper accessibility attributes and loading state indication.

Consider these improvements:

     <StatusButton
       label={label}
       onClick={handleClick}
       severity={severity}
-      disabled={disabled}
+      disabled={disabled || isLoading}
+      loading={isLoading}
       title={title}
+      aria-label={title || label}
     />
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionMenu/index.tsx (3)

5-14: Update JSDoc to match component props

The documentation has a few inconsistencies:

  • Missing documentation for the onOptionClick prop
  • The onClick parameter description should be renamed to onOptionClick
 /**
  * Component which provides a context menu for executing an operator using a
  * specified execution target.
  *
  * @param anchor Element to use as context menu anchor
  * @param open If true, context menu will be visible
  * @param onClose Callback for context menu close events
  * @param executionOptions List of operator execution options
- * @param onClick Callback for an option being clicked
+ * @param onOptionClick Callback for when an execution option is selected
  */

15-27: Consider extracting props interface

For better reusability and maintainability, consider extracting the props interface into a separate type definition.

+interface OperatorExecutionMenuProps {
+  anchor?: Element | null;
+  open: boolean;
+  onClose: () => void;
+  executionOptions: OperatorExecutionOption[];
+  onOptionClick?: (option: OperatorExecutionOption) => void;
+}

-export const OperatorExecutionMenu = ({
-  anchor,
-  open,
-  onClose,
-  executionOptions,
-  onOptionClick,
-}: {
-  anchor?: Element | null;
-  open: boolean;
-  onClose: () => void;
-  executionOptions: OperatorExecutionOption[];
-  onOptionClick?: (option: OperatorExecutionOption) => void;
-}) => {
+export const OperatorExecutionMenu = ({
+  anchor,
+  open,
+  onClose,
+  executionOptions,
+  onOptionClick,
+}: OperatorExecutionMenuProps) => {

50-51: Consider removing default export

Having both named and default exports can lead to inconsistent import patterns across the codebase. Consider sticking with named exports only, as they are more explicit and better for tree-shaking.

-export default OperatorExecutionMenu;
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (4)

1-8: Consider reordering imports following React/TypeScript conventions

For better maintainability, consider reordering imports following common conventions:

-import { Button } from "@mui/material";
-import { OperatorExecutionTrigger } from "../OperatorExecutionTrigger";
-import React from "react";
-import {
-  ExecutionCallback,
-  ExecutionErrorCallback,
-} from "../../types-internal";
-import { OperatorExecutionOption } from "../../state";

+import React from "react";
+import { Button } from "@mui/material";
+
+import { OperatorExecutionTrigger } from "../OperatorExecutionTrigger";
+import { OperatorExecutionOption } from "../../state";
+import {
+  ExecutionCallback,
+  ExecutionErrorCallback,
+} from "../../types-internal";

10-19: Enhance JSDoc documentation with @returns and @example

The documentation is good but could be more comprehensive.

Consider adding:

/**
 * Button which acts as a trigger for opening an `OperatorExecutionMenu`.
 *
 * @param operatorUri Operator URI
 * @param onSuccess Callback for successful operator execution
 * @param onError Callback for operator execution error
 * @param executionParams Parameters to provide to the operator's execute call
 * @param onOptionSelected Callback for execution option selection
 * @param disabled If true, disables the button and context menu
 * @returns A button component that triggers the execution menu
 * @example
 * <OperatorExecutionButton
 *   operatorUri="my-operator"
 *   onSuccess={() => console.log("Success")}
 *   disabled={false}
 * >
 *   Execute
 * </OperatorExecutionButton>
 */

20-37: Extract props interface and add runtime validation

Consider improving type safety and maintainability.

+import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
+
+interface OperatorExecutionButtonProps extends React.ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement> {
+  operatorUri: string;
+  onSuccess?: ExecutionCallback;
+  onError?: ExecutionErrorCallback;
+  executionParams?: object;
+  onOptionSelected?: (option: OperatorExecutionOption) => void;
+  disabled?: boolean;
+  children: React.ReactNode;
+}

-export const OperatorExecutionButton = ({
+export const OperatorExecutionButton: React.FC<OperatorExecutionButtonProps> = ({

// Add at the bottom of the file:
+OperatorExecutionButton.propTypes = {
+  operatorUri: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+  onSuccess: PropTypes.func,
+  onError: PropTypes.func,
+  executionParams: PropTypes.object,
+  onOptionSelected: PropTypes.func,
+  disabled: PropTypes.bool,
+  children: PropTypes.node.isRequired,
+};

54-54: Consider using only named exports

Having both named and default exports can lead to inconsistent import patterns across the codebase.

-export default OperatorExecutionButton;

Use named exports consistently throughout the application:

import { OperatorExecutionButton } from './OperatorExecutionButton';
app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/StatusButton.tsx (5)

1-14: Consider optimizing imports for better maintainability and bundle size.

A few suggestions to improve the imports:

  1. The relative import ../ for useTheme is ambiguous. Consider using an absolute path.
  2. Lodash import could be more specific: import get from 'lodash/get'

15-21: Consider removing the !important flag from borderColor.

The use of !important in borderColor might indicate a specificity issue. Consider restructuring the styles to avoid this by:

  1. Increasing selector specificity
  2. Adjusting the Material-UI theme configuration

34-40: Add JSDoc documentation and consider error handling.

The StatusButtonProps interface would benefit from:

  1. JSDoc documentation explaining the purpose of each prop
  2. Error handling for the onClick callback

Example documentation:

/**
 * Props for the StatusButton component
 * @property {string} [label="Disabled"] - The text to display in the button
 * @property {boolean} [disabled=false] - Whether the button is disabled
 * @property {() => void} onClick - Callback function when the settings icon is clicked
 * @property {Severity} severity - The severity level affecting the button's color
 * @property {string} [title] - Tooltip text to display on hover
 */

53-55: Remove unnecessary handleClick wrapper function.

The handleClick function can be removed and onClick can be used directly in the Button props since it doesn't add any additional functionality.

-  const handleClick = () => {
-    onClick();
-  };

And update the Button props:

-  onClick={handleClick}
+  onClick={onClick}

87-97: Consider using theme variables for consistent styling.

The button styles contain hardcoded values that could be derived from the theme for better consistency:

  • minWidth: 32
  • opacity: 0.5

Consider updating to:

  sx={{
-   minWidth: 32,
-   opacity: disabled ? 0.5 : 1,
+   minWidth: theme.spacing(4),
+   opacity: disabled ? theme.palette.action.disabledOpacity : 1,
    outline: "none",
    border: "none !important",
    "&:hover": {
      border: "none",
      outline: "none",
      background: theme.action.hover,
    },
  }}
app/packages/embeddings/src/Embeddings.tsx (4)

Line range hint 29-29: Add TypeScript type definitions for component props

The Embeddings component props containerHeight and dimensions lack TypeScript type definitions, which reduces type safety and IDE support.

-export default function Embeddings({ containerHeight, dimensions }) {
+interface EmbeddingsDimensions {
+  bounds: {
+    width: number;
+    height: number;
+  };
+}
+
+interface EmbeddingsProps {
+  containerHeight: number;
+  dimensions: EmbeddingsDimensions;
+}
+
+export default function Embeddings({ containerHeight, dimensions }: EmbeddingsProps) {

Line range hint 30-52: Consider decomposing complex state management logic

The component contains multiple state management hooks and complex logic. Consider extracting the state management into a custom hook for better maintainability and reusability.

+// Create a new file: useEmbeddingsState.ts
+export function useEmbeddingsState() {
+  const el = useRef();
+  const theme = useTheme();
+  const resetZoom = useResetPlotZoom();
+  const brainResultSelector = useBrainResultsSelector();
+  const labelSelector = useLabelSelector();
+  const plotSelection = usePlotSelection();
+  const [dragMode, setDragMode] = usePanelStatePartial("dragMode", "lasso", true);
+  
+  useEffect(() => {
+    setPanelCloseEffect(() => {
+      plotSelection.clearSelection();
+    });
+  }, [setPanelCloseEffect, plotSelection]);
+
+  return {
+    el,
+    theme,
+    resetZoom,
+    brainResultSelector,
+    labelSelector,
+    plotSelection,
+    dragMode,
+    setDragMode,
+  };
+}

Line range hint 89-146: Enhance accessibility for interactive elements

While tooltips are provided, the interactive elements could benefit from additional accessibility improvements:

  • Add ARIA labels for icons
  • Ensure proper keyboard navigation
  • Add role attributes where appropriate
 <PlotOption
   cy="embeddings-plot-option-lasso"
   style={{ opacity: dragMode !== "lasso" ? 0.5 : 1 }}
   to={() => setDragMode("lasso")}
   title={"Select (s)"}
+  role="button"
+  aria-label="Enable lasso selection mode"
 >
   <HighlightAlt />
 </PlotOption>

Line range hint 65-88: Consider performance optimizations

The component handles complex rendering logic and multiple state updates. Consider these optimizations:

  1. Memoize callback functions with useCallback
  2. Memoize complex computations with useMemo
  3. Use React.memo for child components
+const MemoizedSelector = React.memo(Selector);
+
 {brainResultSelector.hasSelection && !labelSelector.isLoading && (
-  <Selector
+  <MemoizedSelector
     cy="embeddings-colorby"
     {...labelSelector.handlers}
     placeholder={"Color by"}
app/packages/components/src/components/ThemeProvider/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-299: Consider adding type definitions for custom theme properties

The theme configuration could benefit from TypeScript type definitions for custom properties. This would provide better type safety and autocompletion support when using custom colors like primaryMedium.

Example implementation:

declare module '@mui/material/styles' {
  interface CustomPalette {
    shadow: string;
    shadowDark: string;
    lightning: string;
    toastBackgroundColor: string;
    primarySoft: string;
    primaryMedium: string;
  }
  
  interface Palette {
    custom: CustomPalette;
  }
}
app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (1)

1071-1082: Documentation could be enhanced with more details.

While the class implementation follows the established pattern, the documentation could be more descriptive by including:

  • The purpose and use cases of the status button
  • Available options/props and their effects
  • Example usage

Consider expanding the documentation like this:

 /**
  * Operator class for rendering a status button.
+ * 
+ * This view renders a button that can display different states through its appearance.
+ * Useful for showing operation status, health indicators, or action states.
+ * 
+ * @example
+ * ```typescript
+ * new StatusButtonView({
+ *   label: "Service Status",
+ *   severity: "warning",
+ *   onClick: () => {},
+ * })
+ * ```
  */
fiftyone/operators/types.py (1)

2203-2213: Add usage examples to the docstring

Consider adding usage examples to demonstrate how to create and configure a StatusButtonView, similar to other view classes in this file. This would help developers understand how to properly use this component.

Example to add:

# Example usage
status_btn = types.StatusButtonView(
    severity="success",
    title="Ready",
    on_click=self.handle_click,
    params={"action": "start"},
    disabled=False
)
panel.view("status", status_btn)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx (1)

15-39: Document the children prop in the component's JSDoc comment.

The children prop is required but is not documented in the JSDoc. Adding it will improve clarity for other developers using this component.

Apply this diff to add the documentation:

/**
 * Component which acts as a trigger for opening an `OperatorExecutionMenu`.
 *
 * This component is meant to act as a wrapper around the interactable
 * component. For example, if you wanted to add operator execution to a button,
 *
 * ```tsx
 * <OperatorExecutionTrigger {...props}>
 *   <Button>Execute operator</Button>
 * </OperatorExecutionTrigger>
 * ```
 *
 *
 * This component registers a click handler which will manage the
 * `OperatorExecutionMenu` lifecycle.
 *
 * @param operatorUri Operator URI
 * @param onClick Callback for click events
 * @param onSuccess Callback for successful operator execution
 * @param onError Callback for operator execution error
 * @param executionParams Parameters to provide to the operator's execute call
 * @param executorOptions Operator executor options
 * @param onOptionSelected Callback for execution option selection
 * @param disabled If true, context menu will never open
+ * @param children The interactable component that triggers the execution menu
 */
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx (2)

61-110: Refactor repetitive style assignments in getButtonProps

The getButtonProps function contains multiple if statements that check the variant value to assign styles. Consider refactoring this logic using a switch statement or a mapping object to improve readability and maintainability.


116-136: Optimize handling of disabled styles in getCommonProps

The styles for the disabled state are conditionally applied within the sx prop. Since MUI components handle the disabled state internally, you might simplify the style overrides by leveraging MUI's built-in disabled styling. This can reduce complexity and potential styling inconsistencies.

app/packages/operators/src/state.ts (1)

Line range hint 247-279: Remove hardcoded 'FOR TESTING' tag in execution options

The tag property is set to "FOR TESTING", which appears to be a placeholder or debugging value. Consider removing it or replacing it with an appropriate value for production.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

           "Execute",
         id: "execute",
-        tag: "FOR TESTING",
         default: defaultToExecute,
         description:
           "Run this operation synchronously. Only suitable for small datasets",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e41330 and 8f480ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/StatusButton.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/ThemeProvider/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/embeddings/src/Embeddings.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionMenu/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (4 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/state.ts (8 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (2 hunks)
  • fiftyone/operators/types.py (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (15)
app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/StatusButton.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/components/src/components/ThemeProvider/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/components/src/components/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/utils/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/embeddings/src/Embeddings.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionMenu/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/state.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (21)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx (1)

1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.

The imports follow a logical order and all imported modules are utilized in the component.

app/packages/operators/src/index.ts (1)

7-7: LGTM! Export follows consistent patterns

The new export for OperatorExecutionButton is well-placed, maintains alphabetical ordering, and follows the established export patterns in the file.

app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionMenu/index.tsx (2)

1-4: LGTM: Clean and specific imports

The imports are well-organized, importing only the necessary components and types.


28-48: LGTM: Well-structured menu rendering logic

The menu rendering logic is well-implemented with proper event handling and UI structure. However, be aware that executing multiple callbacks in the onClick handler could potentially lead to race conditions if any of these operations are asynchronous.

app/packages/components/src/components/index.ts (1)

35-35: LGTM! Export follows established patterns.

The new StatusButton export follows the consistent pattern used throughout the file and is properly alphabetically ordered.

Let's verify the StatusButton component implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: StatusButton component exists and follows React patterns

The component is properly implemented in app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton/StatusButton.tsx with:

  • Correct TypeScript/React function component structure
  • Proper props typing with StatusButtonProps interface
  • Standard React hooks usage (useTheme)
  • Consistent Material-UI component composition
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify StatusButton component exists and follows React/TypeScript patterns

# Check if StatusButton component and its types exist
fd -e tsx -e ts "StatusButton" app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton

# Verify the component implementation follows React patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function StatusButton($_) {
  $$$
}' app/packages/components/src/components/StatusButton

Length of output: 6437

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/utils/index.ts (2)

115-115: LGTM! Addition of StatusButtonView to non-editable views is appropriate.

The StatusButtonView fits well with other non-editable view types like ButtonView and AlertView, maintaining consistency in how status-related UI components are handled.


115-115: Verify StatusButtonView component implementation.

Let's ensure the StatusButtonView component is properly defined and used consistently.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the StatusButtonView implementation and its usage.


StatusButtonView component is properly implemented and integrated

The component is well-defined with:

  • Proper implementation in StatusButtonView.tsx using React and required dependencies
  • Correct export in components/index.ts
  • Appropriate classification as a non-editable view in utils/index.ts

The implementation includes proper handling of:

  • Event triggering through usePanelEvent
  • Panel identification via usePanelId
  • Required props and view configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify StatusButtonView component existence and usage

# Check if StatusButtonView component exists
echo "Checking for StatusButtonView component definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export class StatusButtonView' || ast-grep --pattern 'class StatusButtonView'

# Check for StatusButtonView imports and usage
echo "Checking for StatusButtonView usage..."
rg -l "StatusButtonView"

# Check for view component registration
echo "Checking if StatusButtonView is properly registered..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import { StatusButtonView }'

Length of output: 699


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of StatusButtonView
echo "Checking StatusButtonView implementation..."
cat app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/StatusButtonView.tsx

# Check how it's exported and used in components/index.ts
echo -e "\nChecking component exports..."
cat app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/index.ts

# Check the usage context in utils/index.ts
echo -e "\nChecking usage in utils/index.ts..."
cat app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/utils/index.ts

Length of output: 7612

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/index.ts (1)

41-41: LGTM! New exports follow established patterns

The new component exports maintain consistency with the codebase by:

  • Following the established *View naming convention
  • Preserving alphabetical ordering
  • Using correct TypeScript export syntax

Also applies to: 49-49

app/packages/embeddings/src/Embeddings.tsx (1)

3-3: Verify loading state handling after Loading component removal

The removal of the Loading import suggests a change in loading state management, but labelSelector.isLoading is still being used. Ensure that loading states are properly handled throughout the component.

app/packages/components/src/components/ThemeProvider/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 284-299: Implementation follows React best practices

The ThemeProvider component and associated hooks are well-implemented with:

  • Proper TypeScript types
  • Clean separation of concerns
  • Efficient state management using Recoil
  • Proper error handling for theme state
app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (1)

1308-1308: LGTM!

The StatusButtonView is correctly added to the VIEWS constant, maintaining consistency with other view types.

fiftyone/operators/types.py (1)

2214-2218: LGTM!

The implementation follows the established patterns for view classes in this module and properly inherits from the base View class.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx (1)

12-59: Component implementation follows best practices

The OperatorExecutionButtonView component is well-structured and correctly utilizes React and Material-UI components. Props are properly destructured, and default values are appropriately assigned. The use of utility functions enhances readability.

app/packages/operators/src/state.ts (5)

228-243: Type definition for OperatorExecutionOption is correctly defined


321-321: Option for scheduling on specific orchestrators is correctly implemented


333-341: Default selection logic in execution options is implemented correctly


349-355: Selected option handling is correctly implemented


385-410: Hook useOperatorExecutionOptions is well-defined

app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (3)

911-911: Confirm query_performance handling in execution options resolution

The inclusion of query_performance: currentContext.queryPerformance in the /operators/resolve-execution-options request enhances performance tracking during execution options resolution. Please verify that the server-side endpoint accommodates this parameter correctly.

Execute the following script to validate the server implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the handling of query_performance in the execution options resolution.

The query_performance parameter is properly handled in the execution context

The codebase shows that query_performance is:

  • Correctly passed from the client in app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts as part of the execution options request
  • Properly handled in the server-side through the ExecutionContext class in fiftyone/operators/executor.py which exposes it via the query_performance property
  • Accessible to operators through the context parameter in resolve_execution_options()
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Confirm that 'resolve_execution_options' function handles 'query_performance' parameter.

# Search for 'resolve_execution_options' function definitions that include 'query_performance' in their parameters.
ast-grep --pattern 'def resolve_execution_options($_, query_performance, $$):'

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for resolve-execution-options endpoint handling in server-side code
rg -i "resolve.?execution.?options" -A 5

# Also search for query_performance parameter handling
rg -i "query.?performance" -A 3

Length of output: 87122


562-562: Verify server handling of the new query_performance parameter

The addition of query_performance: currentContext.queryPerformance ensures that performance tracking is included in the request body sent to /operators/execute/generator. Please verify that the server-side endpoint correctly accepts and processes the query_performance parameter.

Run the following script to confirm the server implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Server properly handles the query_performance parameter

Based on the codebase analysis, the server-side implementation correctly handles the query_performance parameter:

  • The parameter is properly accessed through request_params in the operator executor: fiftyone/operators/executor.py shows query_performance is retrieved from request parameters
  • The execution flow through ExecuteOperatorAsGenerator endpoint properly passes all request parameters
  • The parameter is integrated into the core configuration system (fiftyone/core/config.py) with both enable_query_performance and default_query_performance settings
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the server-side 'execute_generator' function handles 'query_performance' parameter.

# Search for 'execute_generator' function definitions that include 'query_performance' in their parameters.
ast-grep --pattern 'def execute_generator($_, query_performance, $$):'

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the server-side implementation

# Search for Python files containing 'execute_generator'
echo "=== Python files with execute_generator ==="
rg -l "execute_generator" --type py

# Search for the actual implementation with context
echo -e "\n=== Implementation of execute_generator ==="
rg "def execute_generator" -A 10 --type py

# Search for query_performance usage in Python files
echo -e "\n=== Usage of query_performance ==="
rg "query_performance" --type py

Length of output: 1335


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the operator execution endpoint and its handling

# Search for operator execution routes/endpoints
echo "=== Operator execution routes ==="
rg -B 5 -A 10 "/operators/execute" --type py

# Search for the Generator class or related implementation
echo -e "\n=== Generator class implementation ==="
rg "class.*Generator" -A 10 --type py

# Look for operator execution in executor.py with more context
echo -e "\n=== Operator execution implementation ==="
rg -B 5 -A 15 "execute.*operator" fiftyone/operators/executor.py

Length of output: 11547


945-945: Verify inclusion of query_performance in remote placements fetching

By adding query_performance: currentContext.queryPerformance, performance tracking is now part of the /operators/resolve-placements request. Ensure that the server correctly processes this parameter when fetching remote placements.

Run the following script to check the server-side handling:

Comment on lines +11 to +18
const panelId = usePanelId();
const triggerEvent = usePanelEvent();
const handleClick = () => {
triggerEvent(panelId, {
operator: on_click,
params,
});
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling and loading state management

The event handling could be more robust with proper error handling and loading state management.

Consider these improvements:

 export default function StatusButtonView(props: ViewPropsType) {
   const { schema } = props;
   const { view = {} } = schema ?? {};
   const { label, on_click, params = {}, severity, disabled, title } = view;
   const panelId = usePanelId();
   const triggerEvent = usePanelEvent();
+  const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = React.useState(false);
+
   const handleClick = () => {
+    if (!panelId) {
+      console.error('StatusButtonView: No panel ID available');
+      return;
+    }
+    setIsLoading(true);
     triggerEvent(panelId, {
       operator: on_click,
       params,
-    });
+    }).catch(error => {
+      console.error('Error triggering event:', error);
+    }).finally(() => {
+      setIsLoading(false);
+    });
   };

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +38 to +51
return (
<OperatorExecutionTrigger
operatorUri={operatorUri}
onSuccess={onSuccess}
onError={onError}
executionParams={executionParams}
onOptionSelected={onOptionSelected}
disabled={disabled}
>
<Button disabled={disabled} {...props}>
{children}
</Button>
</OperatorExecutionTrigger>
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance component with memoization and accessibility

Consider the following improvements for better performance and accessibility:

-export const OperatorExecutionButton = ({
+export const OperatorExecutionButton = React.memo(({
   // ... props
 }) => {
   return (
     <OperatorExecutionTrigger
       operatorUri={operatorUri}
       onSuccess={onSuccess}
       onError={onError}
       executionParams={executionParams}
       onOptionSelected={onOptionSelected}
       disabled={disabled}
     >
-      <Button disabled={disabled} {...props}>
+      <Button 
+        disabled={disabled}
+        aria-label={`Execute operator ${operatorUri}`}
+        {...props}
+      >
         {children}
       </Button>
     </OperatorExecutionTrigger>
   );
-};
+});

+OperatorExecutionButton.displayName = 'OperatorExecutionButton';
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
return (
<OperatorExecutionTrigger
operatorUri={operatorUri}
onSuccess={onSuccess}
onError={onError}
executionParams={executionParams}
onOptionSelected={onOptionSelected}
disabled={disabled}
>
<Button disabled={disabled} {...props}>
{children}
</Button>
</OperatorExecutionTrigger>
);
export const OperatorExecutionButton = React.memo(({
operatorUri,
onSuccess,
onError,
executionParams,
onOptionSelected,
disabled,
children,
...props
}) => {
return (
<OperatorExecutionTrigger
operatorUri={operatorUri}
onSuccess={onSuccess}
onError={onError}
executionParams={executionParams}
onOptionSelected={onOptionSelected}
disabled={disabled}
>
<Button
disabled={disabled}
aria-label={`Execute operator ${operatorUri}`}
{...props}
>
{children}
</Button>
</OperatorExecutionTrigger>
);
});
OperatorExecutionButton.displayName = 'OperatorExecutionButton';

justifyContent="center"
padding="0 8px 0 16px"
sx={{
borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.divider}`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect theme property access.

The theme.divider access appears incorrect. It should likely be theme.palette.divider.

-  borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.divider}`,
+  borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.palette.divider}`,
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.divider}`,
borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.palette.divider}`,

Comment on lines +57 to +103
return (
<Tooltip title={title}>
<ButtonGroup variant="outlined" sx={{ ...ButtonStylesOverrides }}>
<Box
display="flex"
alignItems="center"
justifyContent="center"
padding="0 8px 0 16px"
sx={{
borderRight: `1px solid ${theme.divider}`,
}}
>
<CircleIcon
sx={{ width: "12px", height: "12px", color: severityColor, mr: 1 }}
/>
<Typography
variant="body1"
sx={{
color: severityColor,
textTransform: "none",
mr: "8px",
}}
>
{label}
</Typography>
</Box>
<Button
disableRipple
disabled={disabled}
onClick={handleClick}
sx={{
minWidth: 32,
opacity: disabled ? 0.5 : 1,
outline: "none",
border: "none !important", // overrides disabled border
"&:hover": {
border: "none",
outline: "none",
background: theme.action.hover,
},
}}
>
<SettingsIcon sx={{ width: "20px", color: theme.secondary.main }} />
</Button>
</ButtonGroup>
</Tooltip>
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance accessibility support.

Consider adding the following accessibility improvements:

  1. Add aria-label to the settings button
  2. Include role="status" for the status indicator
  3. Ensure keyboard navigation works correctly with the button group
  <Button
    disableRipple
    disabled={disabled}
    onClick={onClick}
+   aria-label={`Configure ${label}`}
    sx={{...}}
  >

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ let theme = extendMuiTheme({
lightning: "#f5b700",
toastBackgroundColor: "#333",
primarySoft: "hsl(25, 100%, 80%)",
primaryMedium: "hsl(25, 100%, 71%)",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add primaryMedium to light theme for consistency

The new primaryMedium color is only defined in the dark theme. To maintain theme consistency and prevent potential styling issues when switching themes, consider adding a corresponding color definition to the light theme's custom palette.

</Box>

<OperatorExecutionMenu
anchor={containerRef.current}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Handle potential null value of containerRef.current.

containerRef.current could be null on initial render, which may cause issues when passed as the anchor prop to OperatorExecutionMenu. Ensure that the component gracefully handles a null anchor.

Apply this diff to provide a fallback:

<OperatorExecutionMenu
-  anchor={containerRef.current}
+  anchor={containerRef.current || undefined}
  open={isMenuOpen && !disabled}
  onClose={() => setIsMenuOpen(false)}
  onOptionClick={onOptionSelected}
  executionOptions={executionOptions}
/>

Alternatively, modify OperatorExecutionMenu to handle a null or undefined anchor appropriately.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
anchor={containerRef.current}
anchor={containerRef.current || undefined}


const defaultVariant = ["contained", "outlined"];

function getVariant(pros: ViewPropsType) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in function parameter name 'pros'

The parameter name pros in the getVariant function is likely a typo. It should be props for consistency and to prevent any potential runtime errors.

Apply this diff to correct the typo:

-function getVariant(pros: ViewPropsType) {
+function getVariant(props: ViewPropsType) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function getVariant(pros: ViewPropsType) {
function getVariant(props: ViewPropsType) {

Comment on lines +1031 to +1033
callback?.(new OperatorResult(operator, null, ctx.executor, e, false), {
ctx,
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure ctx.executor is defined before usage

In the error handling callback, ctx.executor may be undefined if not properly initialized. Verify that ctx.executor is assigned before being used in OperatorResult.

@@ -485,6 +542,7 @@
return;
}
executor.execute(promptingOperator.params, {
...options,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ordering of spread operators may override intended options

In the call to executor.execute, the options passed may unintentionally override each other due to the order of the spread operators. If options should take precedence over promptingOperator.options, consider reversing the order.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

 executor.execute(promptingOperator.params, {
-  ...options,
-  ...promptingOperator.options,
+  ...promptingOperator.options,
+  ...options,
 });

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -830,6 +831,7 @@ export async function resolveRemoteType(
view: currentContext.view,
view_name: currentContext.viewName,
group_slice: currentContext.groupSlice,
query_performance: currentContext.queryPerformance,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Backend does not currently handle query_performance parameter in type resolution

Based on the examination of the server-side implementation in fiftyone/operators/server.py, the ResolveType endpoint handler does not currently process the query_performance parameter. While the parameter is being sent from the frontend, the server implementation needs to be updated to handle this new parameter for performance tracking.

  • The ResolveType.post() method in fiftyone/operators/server.py only processes dataset_name and operator_uri from the request data
  • While query_performance configuration exists in the codebase (as seen in fiftyone/core/config.py), it's not integrated into the type resolution endpoint
🔗 Analysis chain

Ensure backend support for query_performance in type resolution

By adding query_performance: currentContext.queryPerformance, the request to /operators/resolve-type now includes performance tracking. Confirm that the server-side implementation of type resolution handles this new parameter appropriately.

Use the following script to check the server's capability:


Let me analyze the server-side implementation to verify the handling of query_performance parameter. The previous ast-grep command had syntax issues, so I'm using ripgrep to locate relevant files and examine the implementation.


I found the endpoint definition but need to examine the handler implementation to verify if it properly handles the query_performance parameter.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that 'resolve_type' function in the server handles 'query_performance' parameter.

# Search for 'resolve_type' function definitions that include 'query_performance' in their parameters.
ast-grep --pattern 'def resolve_type($_, query_performance, $$):'

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for resolve-type related endpoints and handlers in Python files
rg -l "resolve.?type" --type py

# Then let's look for query_performance usage in Python files
rg "query_performance" --type py

# Also search for the route definition
rg "/operators/resolve-type" -A 5

Length of output: 1962


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the ResolveType handler implementation
rg -A 10 "class ResolveType" fiftyone/operators/server.py

# Also check the request parameters handling in the handler
rg -B 5 -A 10 "def resolve" fiftyone/operators/server.py

Length of output: 585

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
fiftyone/operators/types.py (1)

1373-1408: LGTM with suggestions for additional validation.

The class implementation is solid with good documentation and basic validation. Consider adding:

  1. Type validation for the params dictionary
  2. Validation of icon names against a predefined set of valid Material Icons
 def __init__(self, **kwargs):
     if "operator" not in kwargs or not isinstance(kwargs["operator"], str):
         raise ValueError(
             "The 'operator' parameter of type str is required."
         )
+    if "params" in kwargs and not isinstance(kwargs["params"], dict):
+        raise ValueError("The 'params' parameter must be a dictionary")
+    if "icon" in kwargs and kwargs["icon"] not in VALID_MATERIAL_ICONS:
+        raise ValueError(f"Invalid icon name: {kwargs['icon']}")
     super().__init__(**kwargs)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f480ac and 3c8796e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (3 hunks)
  • fiftyone/operators/types.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/OperatorExecutionButtonView.tsx
  • app/packages/operators/src/types.ts

Comment on lines +2240 to +2254
class StatusButtonView(View):
"""Renders a status button.

Args:
severity (None): the severity of the alert displayed, one of
``("info", "success", "warning", "error", "enabled", "disabled")``
on_click (None): an operator to execute when the button is clicked
params (None): the parameters to pass to the operator
disabled: whether the button is disabled
title: tooltip title for the button
"""

def __init__(self, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation for severity values.

While the class is well-documented, it should validate the severity parameter against the allowed values to prevent runtime errors.

 def __init__(self, **kwargs):
+    valid_severities = {"info", "success", "warning", "error", "enabled", "disabled"}
+    severity = kwargs.get("severity")
+    if severity is not None and severity not in valid_severities:
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"Invalid severity value: {severity}. Must be one of: {', '.join(valid_severities)}"
+        )
     super().__init__(**kwargs)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
class StatusButtonView(View):
"""Renders a status button.
Args:
severity (None): the severity of the alert displayed, one of
``("info", "success", "warning", "error", "enabled", "disabled")``
on_click (None): an operator to execute when the button is clicked
params (None): the parameters to pass to the operator
disabled: whether the button is disabled
title: tooltip title for the button
"""
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
super().__init__(**kwargs)
class StatusButtonView(View):
"""Renders a status button.
Args:
severity (None): the severity of the alert displayed, one of
``("info", "success", "warning", "error", "enabled", "disabled")``
on_click (None): an operator to execute when the button is clicked
params (None): the parameters to pass to the operator
disabled: whether the button is disabled
title: tooltip title for the button
"""
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
valid_severities = {"info", "success", "warning", "error", "enabled", "disabled"}
severity = kwargs.get("severity")
if severity is not None and severity not in valid_severities:
raise ValueError(
f"Invalid severity value: {severity}. Must be one of: {', '.join(valid_severities)}"
)
super().__init__(**kwargs)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
fiftyone/operators/builtins/panels/model_evaluation/__init__.py (1)

Line range hint 279-283: Consider enhancing error handling and caching strategy

While the error handling for store operations is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Use proper logging instead of just traceback.print_exc()
  2. Consider notifying the user when caching fails
  3. Consider implementing a TTL for cached evaluation data to prevent stale results

Here's a suggested improvement:

             try:
                 store.set(computed_eval_id, evaluation_data)
             except Exception:
-                traceback.print_exc()
+                logger.exception("Failed to cache evaluation data")
+                ctx.ops.notify(
+                    "Warning: Failed to cache evaluation data. Performance may be affected.",
+                    variant="warning"
+                )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c8796e and 1f28dca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • fiftyone/operators/builtins/panels/model_evaluation/__init__.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
fiftyone/operators/builtins/panels/model_evaluation/__init__.py (1)

33-34: LGTM: Improved panel configuration naming

The changes to use the STORE_NAME constant and the more descriptive label "Model Evaluation" improve code maintainability and user experience.

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane merged commit 476e534 into develop Nov 15, 2024
14 checks passed
@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane deleted the merge/release/v1.1.0 branch November 15, 2024 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants