Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add conditional prompt inclusion in generated output based on `is_ret… #8360

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

g-hano
Copy link

@g-hano g-hano commented Sep 11, 2024

Feature: Conditional Prompt Inclusion in generate Function

Motivation: The current implementation of the generate function always includes the prompt in its response. This can be inefficient, especially in streaming scenarios where the prompt is repeatedly included with each token update. The new feature aims to improve efficiency by allowing the prompt to be included conditionally based on a new parameter.

Changes Made:

  • Introduced a new is_return_prompt parameter in the request.
  • Modified the list comprehension to conditionally include the prompt in the generated output based on the value of is_return_prompt.
    If is_return_prompt is True, the prompt is concatenated with the output text.
    If is_return_prompt is False, only the output text is returned.
  • Applied this change to both streaming and non-streaming cases to ensure consistency.

Related Issues: #8359

Additional Context: Including the prompt in every streaming iteration can be redundant and inefficient. This update provides users with the flexibility to exclude the prompt from the response, improving the overall efficiency of the generate function.

FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE

FIX #8359

BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

…urn_prompt` flag

- Introduced a new `is_return_prompt` parameter in the request.
- Modified the list comprehension to conditionally include the prompt in the generated output based on the value of `is_return_prompt`.
  - If `is_return_prompt` is True, the prompt is concatenated with the output text.
  - If `is_return_prompt` is False, only the output text is returned.
- Applied this change to both streaming and non-streaming cases to ensure consistency.
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

The api_server.py is not intended for production use so we generally don't update that anymore unless it is related to core changes in vLLM. Instead, please focus your efforts on the OpenAI-compatible server.

@njhill
Copy link
Member

njhill commented Sep 11, 2024

Thanks @g-hano! I have a related PR #7381 which I'm hoping to get merged today. With that, if you choose output_kind=DELTA, only the first output(s) will contain the prompt. And the OpenAI server will exploit this.

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

Closing as superseded by #7381

@mergify mergify bot added the frontend label Nov 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature]: Conditional Prompt Inclusion in generate Function for Streaming Efficiency
3 participants