-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bugfix] update neuron for version > 0.5.0 #7175
Conversation
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge). To run full CI, you can do one of these:
🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com>
@liangfu I merged in main and am now failing tests, is this the CI/CD issue you mean? |
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <cyrus.tl.leung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <cyrus.tl.leung@gmail.com>
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ def add_cli_args(parser: FlexibleArgumentParser) -> FlexibleArgumentParser: | |||
parser.add_argument('--block-size', | |||
type=int, | |||
default=EngineArgs.block_size, | |||
choices=[8, 16, 32], | |||
choices=[8, 16, 32, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am curious why we skip 64? Is it for a specific reason? Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may have been an oversight during testing, but it's been addressed by #7562
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <cyrus.tl.leung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alvant <alvasian@yandex.ru>
Signed-off-by: omrishiv <327609+omrishiv@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cyrus Leung <cyrus.tl.leung@gmail.com>
FILL IN THE PR DESCRIPTION HERE
FIX #6269
This is the first of multiple PRs to address some neuron issues.
vLLM >= 0.5.1 refactored the
WorkerBase
around. This adds the missing abstract methodexecute_worker
that was failing, while also addressing a few other inconsistencies. This PR also expands theblock-size
choices due to neuron needingblock-size = sequence-length
. At the moment, tensor parallelism/model parallelism are not supported. That will come in the next PR.