-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
beef up FAI detection related parameter explanations – #110 #143
Conversation
@jGaboardi thanks for the deciphering!! i did a second pass on the parameter documentation - but now I think it needs a third 😅 as in: it is factually correct now but potentially too detailed / verbose |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(see my commit & comment above)
I'm fine with @anastassiavybornova version. |
Do not merge. Still reviewing. |
Won't, also due to
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice @anastassiavybornova . Small language changes and little typos only.
@anastassiavybornova Would you like to review my suggestions or shall I commit them myself? (still need to update the other docstrings after that). |
Co-authored-by: James Gaboardi <jgaboardi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Gaboardi <jgaboardi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James Gaboardi <jgaboardi@gmail.com>
@jGaboardi reviewing them now! |
@jGaboardi done |
I'll merge this once CI is green. |
*_threshold_*
params insimply.simplify_network()
#110simplify_network()
are accurate & make sense, I'll cascade them into internal functions prior to merging.