Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump metadata cache back down #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2019
Merged

Bump metadata cache back down #102

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2019

Conversation

dstuebe
Copy link
Contributor

@dstuebe dstuebe commented Aug 23, 2019

The cache size was too large - needed too much heap.
Bump the cache size back down.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d9ddb49). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #102   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   89.65%           
  Complexity        ?      719           
=========================================
  Files             ?       56           
  Lines             ?     2677           
  Branches          ?      176           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     2400           
  Misses            ?      192           
  Partials          ?       85
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...java/com/upserve/uppend/lookup/LookupMetadata.java 98.47% <ø> (ø) 30 <0> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d9ddb49...02a4b4d. Read the comment docs.

@dstuebe dstuebe merged commit a28abd8 into master Aug 23, 2019
@dstuebe dstuebe deleted the lower_metadata_cache branch August 23, 2019 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants