Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add albedo coupling through CMEPS #701

Closed

Conversation

DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen commented Jul 21, 2021

PR Checklist

  • Ths PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.

  • This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR

  • An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
    are specified below.

  • If new or updated input data is required by this PR, it is clearly stated in the text of the PR.

Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.

The information provided below allows the code managers to understand the changes relevant to this PR, whether those changes are in the ufs-weather-model repository or in a subcomponent repository. Ufs-weather-model code managers will use the information provided to add any applicable labels, assign reviewers and place it in the Commit Queue. Once the PR is in the Commit Queue, it is the PR owner's responsiblity to keep the PR up-to-date with the develop branch of ufs-weather-model.

Description

Adds export of 4 components of CICE6 albedos.
Adds additional coupler history options (optionally used for diagnostics).

Issue(s) addressed

CMEPS Issue #52
UFS Issue #700

Testing

Initial testing for gaea.intel shows that all coupled and datm baselines will change because of the additional albedo fields in the coupler restart file. However, all forecast and restart files are otherwise B4B.

How were these changes tested? What compilers / HPCs was it tested with? Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?) Have regression tests and unit tests (utests) been run? On which platforms and with which compilers? (Note that unit tests can only be run on tier-1 platforms)

  • hera.intel
  • hera.gnu
  • orion.intel
  • cheyenne.intel
  • cheyenne.gnu
  • gaea.intel
  • jet.intel
  • wcoss_cray
  • wcoss_dell_p3
  • CI

Dependencies

CMEPS PR #53

DeniseWorthen and others added 30 commits March 27, 2021 12:30
This reverts commit 7b826d4.
DeniseWorthen and others added 23 commits May 21, 2021 15:26
* point to branch containing history updates and albedos
@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen self-assigned this Jul 21, 2021
@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Will re-open w/ renamed CMEPS branch

@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen deleted the feature/add_albedos branch July 23, 2021 20:17
epic-cicd-jenkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
## DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES: 
Several paths in the machine-specific files point to locations in user paths or old locations of static data. This PR updates paths of static data in regional_workflow/ush/machine/ to point to the official, centralized locations on Cheyenne, Hera, and Jet.

## TESTS CONDUCTED: 
Ran the following suite of end-to-end tests on Cheyenne and Jet prior to the latest ufs-weather-model hash update. All passed. This list of tests was chosen because all of these tests are known to succeed on all tested platforms, and this tests a variety of input and boundary condition types.

- grid_CONUS_25km_GFDLgrid_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_13km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_RRFS_v1beta
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v15p2
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_FV3GFS_lbcs_FV3GFS_suite_GFS_v16
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_HRRR_suite_HRRR
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_HRRR_suite_RRFS_v1beta
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_HRRR
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_25km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_RRFS_v1beta
- grid_RRFS_CONUS_3km_ics_HRRR_lbcs_RAP_suite_RRFS_v1beta


On Hera, I ran tests with the latest SRW hash, which included the updated weather model. Because of this, many tests could not be generated due to using old, removed CCPP suites (see issue #668). To get around this issue, I tested with the fixes from #697 incorporated into my branch. With those extra commits, all "get_extrn_ics" and "get_extrn_lbcs" tasks completed successfully, which indicates that all data is in its correct place.

## ISSUE (optional): 
Will resolve a few issues in #673, many remain however.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant