Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add chrome-sandbox to the Linux x86_64 release workflow #1121

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

syhlx
Copy link

@syhlx syhlx commented May 21, 2024

Description

Adding the "chrome-sandbox" to the Linux x86_64 build and release workflows in preparation for the Linux Flatpak.

This will build the 320.7 kB binary which allows Chromium-based browsers to run properly in a sandbox (like Flatpak) on Linux.

All submissions

  • there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • Cromite can be built with these changes
  • I have tested that the new change works as intended (AVD or physical device will do)

Format

  • patch subject and filename match (e.g. Subject: Alternative cache (NIK-based) -> Alternative-cache-NIK-based.patch)
  • patch description contains explanation of changes
  • no unnecessary whitespace or unrelated changes

@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ jobs:
gn args out/lin64/ --list >out/lin64/gn_list
echo "::endgroup::"

ninja -C out/lin64 chrome
ninja -C out/lin64 chrome chrome_sandbox
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

already done! :)

754f4cb

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had not seen your pull, sorry.

@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ jobs:
echo "::group::-------- linux x64"
mkdir chrome-lin/
cp $OUTPUTFILE_LIN/chrome chrome-lin/
cp $OUTPUTFILE_LIN/chrome_sandbox chrome-lin/chrome-sandbox
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you answer me first at #1053 ?

@syhlx
Copy link
Author

syhlx commented Jun 5, 2024

Not needed anymore

@syhlx syhlx closed this Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants