Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Check issuer policies regardless of attestation config #1598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

bstasyszyn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Feb 15, 2024
@bstasyszyn bstasyszyn marked this pull request as draft February 15, 2024 14:44
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fbd86f6) 85.33% compared to head (96d62b6) 85.34%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1598   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.33%   85.34%           
=======================================
  Files         170      170           
  Lines       11053    11058    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits         9432     9437    +5     
  Misses       1176     1176           
  Partials      445      445           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bstasyszyn bstasyszyn force-pushed the check-policies-during-issuance branch from a184b5d to eb3d44c Compare February 15, 2024 15:04
Signed-off-by: Bob Stasyszyn <Bob.Stasyszyn@securekey.com>
@bstasyszyn bstasyszyn force-pushed the check-policies-during-issuance branch from eb3d44c to 96d62b6 Compare February 15, 2024 21:33
@bstasyszyn bstasyszyn marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2024 21:33
@fqutishat fqutishat merged commit 600ed42 into trustbloc:main Feb 15, 2024
10 checks passed
@bstasyszyn bstasyszyn deleted the check-policies-during-issuance branch February 15, 2024 21:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants