Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the getNodalFieldSolution function in FEI. #1992

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2017
Merged

Modify the getNodalFieldSolution function in FEI. #1992

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2017

Conversation

alanw0
Copy link
Contributor

@alanw0 alanw0 commented Nov 15, 2017

Previous to this change, the nodal loop would continue if the node was
a shared node and was not attached to the local element. This continue
was causing issues in parallel when the nodal data was being synched across
processor after a FETI solve when the run involved element death.
This created many issues and support tickets in the Sierra system that
we have been working through for a long time.

This was a great team effort with Alan, Kendall, Mike, and Patrick.
Alan and Kendall will work on pushing this change to Trilinos.

@trilinos/fei

Description

Motivation and Context

Related Issues

  • Closes
  • Blocks
  • Is blocked by
  • Follows
  • Precedes
  • Related to
  • Part of
  • Composed of

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Checklist

  • My commit messages mention the appropriate GitHub issue numbers.
  • [x ] My code follows the code style of the affected package(s).
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the code contribution guidelines for this project.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • [x ] All new and existing tests passed.
  • [x ] No new compiler warnings were introduced.
  • These changes break backwards compatibility.

Additional Information

Previous to this change, the nodal loop would continue if the node was
a shared node and was not attached to the local element. This continue
was causing issues in parallel when the nodal data was being synched across
processor after a FETI solve when the run involved element death.
This created many issues and support tickets we have been working through for a
long time.

This was a great team effort with Alan, Kendall, Mike, and Patrick.
Alan and Kendall will work on pushing this change to Trilinos.
@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging
WARNING: NO REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED FOR THIS PULL REQUEST!

Copy link
Member

@jwillenbring jwillenbring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes appear to be reasonable and have been verified to fix an issue for an important customer.

@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ jwillenbring ]!

@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects:

Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING

Build Information

  • Test Name: Trilinos_autotester_test
  • Build Num: 116
  • Status: STARTED

Jenkins Parameters

Parameter Name Value
COMPILER_MODULE sems-gcc/4.8.4
JENKINS_BUILD_TYPE Release
JENKINS_COMM_TYPE MPI
JENKINS_DO_COMPLEX OFF
JENKINS_JOB_TYPE Experimental
MPI_MODULE sems-openmpi/1.8.7
TEST_REPO_ALIAS TRILINOS
TRILINOS_SOURCE_BRANCH minor_fei_fix
TRILINOS_SOURCE_REPO https://github.com/alanw0/Trilinos
TRILINOS_SOURCE_SHA fea68d3
TRILINOS_TARGET_BRANCH develop
TRILINOS_TARGET_REPO https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos
TRILINOS_TARGET_SHA d7e4e42

Build Information

  • Test Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3
  • Build Num: 33
  • Status: STARTED

Jenkins Parameters

Parameter Name Value
COMPILER_MODULE sems-gcc/4.9.3
JENKINS_BUILD_TYPE Release
JENKINS_COMM_TYPE MPI
JENKINS_DO_COMPLEX OFF
JENKINS_JOB_TYPE Experimental
MPI_MODULE sems-openmpi/1.8.7
TEST_REPO_ALIAS TRILINOS
TRILINOS_SOURCE_BRANCH minor_fei_fix
TRILINOS_SOURCE_REPO https://github.com/alanw0/Trilinos
TRILINOS_SOURCE_SHA fea68d3
TRILINOS_TARGET_BRANCH develop
TRILINOS_TARGET_REPO https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos
TRILINOS_TARGET_SHA d7e4e42

Using Repos:

  • Repo: TRILINOS (alanw0/Trilinos)
  • Branch: minor_fei_fix
  • SHA: fea68d3
  • Mode: TEST_REPO

Pull Request Author: alanw0

@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED

Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED

Build Information

  • Test Name: Trilinos_autotester_test
  • Build Num: 116
  • Status: PASSED

Jenkins Parameters

Parameter Name Value
COMPILER_MODULE sems-gcc/4.8.4
JENKINS_BUILD_TYPE Release
JENKINS_COMM_TYPE MPI
JENKINS_DO_COMPLEX OFF
JENKINS_JOB_TYPE Experimental
MPI_MODULE sems-openmpi/1.8.7
TEST_REPO_ALIAS TRILINOS
TRILINOS_SOURCE_BRANCH minor_fei_fix
TRILINOS_SOURCE_REPO https://github.com/alanw0/Trilinos
TRILINOS_SOURCE_SHA fea68d3
TRILINOS_TARGET_BRANCH develop
TRILINOS_TARGET_REPO https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos
TRILINOS_TARGET_SHA d7e4e42

Build Information

  • Test Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_4.9.3
  • Build Num: 33
  • Status: PASSED

Jenkins Parameters

Parameter Name Value
COMPILER_MODULE sems-gcc/4.9.3
JENKINS_BUILD_TYPE Release
JENKINS_COMM_TYPE MPI
JENKINS_DO_COMPLEX OFF
JENKINS_JOB_TYPE Experimental
MPI_MODULE sems-openmpi/1.8.7
TEST_REPO_ALIAS TRILINOS
TRILINOS_SOURCE_BRANCH minor_fei_fix
TRILINOS_SOURCE_REPO https://github.com/alanw0/Trilinos
TRILINOS_SOURCE_SHA fea68d3
TRILINOS_TARGET_BRANCH develop
TRILINOS_TARGET_REPO https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos
TRILINOS_TARGET_SHA d7e4e42

@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ jwillenbring ]!

@trilinos-autotester
Copy link
Contributor

Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Pull Request MUST BE MERGED MANUALLY BY Project Team - Master Automerge is disabled (in .cfg file)

@jwillenbring
Copy link
Member

These changes fixed an issue for an important customer and passed the pull request testing. I am going to merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants