-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CPU handling on CRAN #253
Comments
Crikey. How long does it take on the other architectures? |
Thats the thing, its not it other servers and its a bit of a rabbit hole to dig to try reproduce. I think I will do some digging if no luck, I'll post to posit community then to R dev mailing list (terrifying but probably necessary) |
OK looks like I can replicate here with checkhelper
testing now... |
we do have low level parallel processing via the see https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/stringdist/versions/0.9.1/topics/stringdist-parallelization |
i think
in the test part will probably handle it? |
Oooh this has been addressed! in #254 its currently failing for other reasons that I was unable to reproduce anywhere. Sorry folks... closing this one though! |
Currently our package using too CPU testing
According to CRAN testing, our package is currently failing this criterion one of the many testing servers….
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
Check: tests, Result: NOTE
Running 'testthat.R' [937s/57s]
Running R code in 'testthat.R' had CPU time 16.5 times elapsed time
I don't understand how this happens as I don't believe we have any parallel processing in the package (especially in tests...)
Updating it to best practices is quite a big job but probably ensures APCalign won't fail in the future.
Will branch and see how long this will take to implement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: