Delete duplicate word "long long" in Introduction #335
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
That's intentional. |
|
It's not duplicate. long long is a type. |
|
haha I see another reason why Linus might not take PRs from Github! |
|
It's a data type... |
|
Dude your request if funny, but as said before "long long" is a data type. You can change some little details in documentation alongside interesting change in source code. |
|
It would be better to mark the A good PR would be marking all the README.md data types and keywords... |
|
@battlesnake If you humiliate somebody just starting to contribute, that person will not probably contribute again, you should teach them how to contribute, not humiliate them, open-source community should not tolerate this type of comments. |
|
The Linux kernel is a complex project, and you can not simply throw Github PRs at it. Please read: |
|
I was remarking on how you interpreted my remark on the (observably low) quality of issues/PRs on Github as me "humiliating" someone - when there is actual abusive/humiliating stuff in the kernel mailing list. As for "teach them how to contribute" - there are much better resources available for learning to program in C than could be fit into Github comments. "open-source community should not tolerate this type of comments" - because your opinion of how people should behave is gospel? I'd point you to http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137392506516022&w=2 Quit playing SJW or I may have to actually start humiliating... |
|
@xavier-fernandez no, why should linux developers dirty up the readme with frivolous nonsense that most programmers would already know? And nobody on this PR has insulted anybody, you'd have to be pretty obtuse to think so. |
|
For this change to be better / more correct, shouldn't both 'longs' be removed? |
|
GitHub has nothing to do with this - people can still do big damage via email |
|
Best pull request I've ever seen in my life. |
|
@xavier-fernandez This is not a "safe space". This PR is absolutely laughable and idiotic. |
|
Hey guy, Don't you know what are you doing? |
|
those github community guidelines make it hard for me to not ridicule this guy but holy mother of god |
|
Omg why
…On Oct 15, 2016 8:56 PM, "AlonsoIbarra" ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi friend, I delete a duplicate word.
------------------------------
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
#335
Commit Summary
- Delete duplicate word "long long" in Introduction
File Changes
- *M* Documentation/HOWTO
<https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/335/files#diff-0> (2)
Patch Links:
- https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/335.patch
- https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/335.diff
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#335>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEK6MO5JGRanvY6LUmf_i0cOhMuZPKiDks5q0PDAgaJpZM4KXu1_>
.
|
|
So long long Marianne. Best PR I've ever seen. |
|
RIP |
|
Was eager to see Linus' reaction to this... |
|
one can hope still yet |
|
Indeed |
|
Who are from the beginning of the rookie |
|
I have a variable named |
|
Is this a joke? |
|
haha what a funny joke |
|
66666666 |
|
oh my god .., XD |
|
Nice job brother |
|
LMAO |
|
I'd have done the same :) Honestly |
|
|
|
卡位朝聖 |
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2017
Linux v4.10 merge
|
He's a genius. How did we not see this? |
|
lol. |
|
e |
alaahl
pushed a commit
to alaahl/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2018
This patch fixes the following splat. [118709.054937] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: test/1571 [118709.054970] caller is nft_update_chain_stats.isra.4+0x53/0x97 [nf_tables] [118709.054980] CPU: 2 PID: 1571 Comm: test Not tainted 4.17.0-rc6+ torvalds#335 [...] [118709.054992] Call Trace: [118709.055011] dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 [118709.055026] check_preemption_disabled+0xd4/0xe4 Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
frank-w
referenced
this pull request
in frank-w/BPI-Router-Linux
Jul 8, 2018
commit ad9d9e8 upstream. This patch fixes the following splat. [118709.054937] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: test/1571 [118709.054970] caller is nft_update_chain_stats.isra.4+0x53/0x97 [nf_tables] [118709.054980] CPU: 2 PID: 1571 Comm: test Not tainted 4.17.0-rc6+ #335 [...] [118709.054992] Call Trace: [118709.055011] dump_stack+0x5f/0x86 [118709.055026] check_preemption_disabled+0xd4/0xe4 Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
You are right but it is better to be constructive. It is easy to say It is better to clearly articulate what is wrong and then give the other person pointers on how they can improve. The confusion happened because the committer is new to programming and for those who are new I see how it can look like a mistake. The keywords need to me marked with back ticks so that it is clear it is intentional. Another thing that can be done is to quickly close the PR and ask them to do proper homework before raising a PR. But I understand you don't have the power to do the latter. Also, don't rely on Linus as a role model of how to behave, he is only able to contribute because he is a good coder, however he is not a good coder because he is an asshole. |
|
@prathik my asm code |
|
Bruh |
|
есе |
|
I’m just passing by ... with my B1lla bag 🛒 🚶 |
|
I think it should be changed to 'so long' |
|
Approved ✅ |
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2023
Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from BPF test_progs selftests: # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#115/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK torvalds#115/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115 ldsx_insn:OK torvalds#302/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#302/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#302/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#302/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#316/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#324/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#324/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#324/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#324/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#324/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#324/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#324/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#335/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#335/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#335/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#335/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#335/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#335 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#347/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-8-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#332 tc_links_after:OK torvalds#333 tc_links_append:OK torvalds#334 tc_links_basic:OK torvalds#335 tc_links_before:OK torvalds#336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK torvalds#337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK torvalds#338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK torvalds#339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK torvalds#340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK torvalds#341 tc_links_ingress:OK torvalds#342 tc_links_invalid:OK torvalds#343 tc_links_prepend:OK torvalds#344 tc_links_replace:OK torvalds#345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708133130.11609-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2024
[ Upstream commit 5f1d18d ] Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#332 tc_links_after:OK torvalds#333 tc_links_append:OK torvalds#334 tc_links_basic:OK torvalds#335 tc_links_before:OK torvalds#336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK torvalds#337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK torvalds#338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK torvalds#339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK torvalds#340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK torvalds#341 tc_links_ingress:OK torvalds#342 tc_links_invalid:OK torvalds#343 tc_links_prepend:OK torvalds#344 tc_links_replace:OK torvalds#345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708133130.11609-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
staging-kernelci-org
pushed a commit
to kernelci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
[ Upstream commit 5f1d18d ] Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#332 tc_links_after:OK torvalds#333 tc_links_append:OK torvalds#334 tc_links_basic:OK torvalds#335 tc_links_before:OK torvalds#336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK torvalds#337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK torvalds#338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK torvalds#339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK torvalds#340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK torvalds#341 tc_links_ingress:OK torvalds#342 tc_links_invalid:OK torvalds#343 tc_links_prepend:OK torvalds#344 tc_links_replace:OK torvalds#345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708133130.11609-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ericwoud
pushed a commit
to ericwoud/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2024
[ Upstream commit 5f1d18d ] Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#332 tc_links_after:OK torvalds#333 tc_links_append:OK torvalds#334 tc_links_basic:OK torvalds#335 tc_links_before:OK torvalds#336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK torvalds#337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK torvalds#338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK torvalds#339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK torvalds#340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK torvalds#341 tc_links_ingress:OK torvalds#342 tc_links_invalid:OK torvalds#343 tc_links_prepend:OK torvalds#344 tc_links_replace:OK torvalds#345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708133130.11609-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jhautbois
pushed a commit
to YoseliSAS/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#332 tc_links_after:OK torvalds#333 tc_links_append:OK torvalds#334 tc_links_basic:OK torvalds#335 tc_links_before:OK torvalds#336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK torvalds#337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK torvalds#338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK torvalds#339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK torvalds#340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK torvalds#341 tc_links_ingress:OK torvalds#342 tc_links_invalid:OK torvalds#343 tc_links_prepend:OK torvalds#344 tc_links_replace:OK torvalds#345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708133130.11609-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi friend, I delete a duplicate word.