Support odroid go super boards #33
Comments
|
Do you want to just copy the branch to mine with new branch name or need new kernel support with 5.x? |
|
Was hoping we could bring the support up to date with the other boards. Newer u-boot and kernel. |
|
Seems like since it's a rockchip, needs a lot of patches on top of mainline. Most recent I've found is |
|
I rebased the kernel, not sure if it works yet. This is 5.10.x based on jeffycn/mirrors: There's also the version 5.13.x by maccraft: |
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 22, 2022
commit 23c2d49 upstream. The kmemleak_*_phys() apis do not check the address for lowmem's min boundary, while the caller may pass an address below lowmem, which will trigger an oops: # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff5fffffffe00000 Oops [#1] Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 134 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-next-20220407 #33 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : scan_block+0x74/0x15c ra : scan_block+0x72/0x15c epc : ffffffff801e5806 ra : ffffffff801e5804 sp : ff200000104abc30 gp : ffffffff815cd4e8 tp : ff60000004cfa340 t0 : 0000000000000200 t1 : 00aaaaaac23954cc t2 : 00000000000003ff s0 : ff200000104abc90 s1 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : ff5fffffffe01000 a2 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a3 : 0000000000000002 a4 : 0000000000000001 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ff200000104abd7c a7 : 0000000000000005 s2 : ff5fffffffe00ff9 s3 : ffffffff815cd998 s4 : ffffffff815d0e90 s5 : ffffffff81b0ff28 s6 : 0000000000000020 s7 : ffffffff815d0eb0 s8 : ffffffffffffffff s9 : ff5fffffffe00000 s10: ff5fffffffe01000 s11: 0000000000000022 t3 : 00ffffffaa17db4c t4 : 000000000000000f t5 : 0000000000000001 t6 : 0000000000000000 status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: ff5fffffffe00000 cause: 000000000000000d scan_gray_list+0x12e/0x1a6 kmemleak_scan+0x2aa/0x57e kmemleak_write+0x32a/0x40c full_proxy_write+0x56/0x82 vfs_write+0xa6/0x2a6 ksys_write+0x6c/0xe2 sys_write+0x22/0x2a ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2 The callers may not quite know the actual address they pass(e.g. from devicetree). So the kmemleak_*_phys() apis should guarantee the address they finally use is in lowmem range, so check the address for lowmem's min boundary. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413122925.33856-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2022
commit 23c2d49 upstream. The kmemleak_*_phys() apis do not check the address for lowmem's min boundary, while the caller may pass an address below lowmem, which will trigger an oops: # echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff5fffffffe00000 Oops [#1] Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 134 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-next-20220407 #33 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : scan_block+0x74/0x15c ra : scan_block+0x72/0x15c epc : ffffffff801e5806 ra : ffffffff801e5804 sp : ff200000104abc30 gp : ffffffff815cd4e8 tp : ff60000004cfa340 t0 : 0000000000000200 t1 : 00aaaaaac23954cc t2 : 00000000000003ff s0 : ff200000104abc90 s1 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 : ff5fffffffe01000 a2 : ffffffff81b0ff28 a3 : 0000000000000002 a4 : 0000000000000001 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ff200000104abd7c a7 : 0000000000000005 s2 : ff5fffffffe00ff9 s3 : ffffffff815cd998 s4 : ffffffff815d0e90 s5 : ffffffff81b0ff28 s6 : 0000000000000020 s7 : ffffffff815d0eb0 s8 : ffffffffffffffff s9 : ff5fffffffe00000 s10: ff5fffffffe01000 s11: 0000000000000022 t3 : 00ffffffaa17db4c t4 : 000000000000000f t5 : 0000000000000001 t6 : 0000000000000000 status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: ff5fffffffe00000 cause: 000000000000000d scan_gray_list+0x12e/0x1a6 kmemleak_scan+0x2aa/0x57e kmemleak_write+0x32a/0x40c full_proxy_write+0x56/0x82 vfs_write+0xa6/0x2a6 ksys_write+0x6c/0xe2 sys_write+0x22/0x2a ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2 The callers may not quite know the actual address they pass(e.g. from devicetree). So the kmemleak_*_phys() apis should guarantee the address they finally use is in lowmem range, so check the address for lowmem's min boundary. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413122925.33856-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang <patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 25, 2022
…ller [ Upstream commit 9d2ce78 ] Naveen reported recursive locking of direct_mutex with sample ftrace-direct-modify.ko: [ 74.762406] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 74.762887] 6.0.0-rc6+ #33 Not tainted [ 74.763216] -------------------------------------------- [ 74.763672] event-sample-fn/1084 is trying to acquire lock: [ 74.764152] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.764922] [ 74.764922] but task is already holding lock: [ 74.765421] ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0 [ 74.766142] [ 74.766142] other info that might help us debug this: [ 74.766701] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 74.766701] [ 74.767216] CPU0 [ 74.767437] ---- [ 74.767656] lock(direct_mutex); [ 74.767952] lock(direct_mutex); [ 74.768245] [ 74.768245] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 74.768245] [ 74.768750] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 74.768750] [ 74.769332] 1 lock held by event-sample-fn/1084: [ 74.769731] #0: ffffffff86c9d6b0 (direct_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: \ modify_ftrace_direct+0x34/0x1f0 [ 74.770496] [ 74.770496] stack backtrace: [ 74.770884] CPU: 4 PID: 1084 Comm: event-sample-fn Not tainted ... [ 74.771498] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... [ 74.772474] Call Trace: [ 74.772696] <TASK> [ 74.772896] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5b [ 74.773223] __lock_acquire.cold.74+0xac/0x2b7 [ 74.773616] lock_acquire+0xd2/0x310 [ 74.773936] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.774357] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd8/0x130 [ 74.774744] ? my_tramp2+0x11/0x11 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.775213] __mutex_lock+0x99/0x1010 [ 74.775536] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.775954] ? slab_free_freelist_hook.isra.43+0x115/0x160 [ 74.776424] ? ftrace_set_hash+0x195/0x220 [ 74.776779] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.777194] ? kfree+0x3e1/0x440 [ 74.777482] ? my_tramp2+0x11/0x11 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.777941] ? __schedule+0xb40/0xb40 [ 74.778258] ? register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.778672] ? my_tramp1+0xf/0xf [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.779128] register_ftrace_function+0x1f/0x180 [ 74.779527] ? ftrace_set_filter_ip+0x33/0x70 [ 74.779910] ? __schedule+0xb40/0xb40 [ 74.780231] ? my_tramp1+0xf/0xf [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.780678] ? my_tramp2+0x11/0x11 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.781147] ftrace_modify_direct_caller+0x5b/0x90 [ 74.781563] ? 0xffffffffa0201000 [ 74.781859] ? my_tramp1+0xf/0xf [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.782309] modify_ftrace_direct+0x1b2/0x1f0 [ 74.782690] ? __schedule+0xb40/0xb40 [ 74.783014] ? simple_thread+0x2a/0xb0 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.783508] ? __schedule+0xb40/0xb40 [ 74.783832] ? my_tramp2+0x11/0x11 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.784294] simple_thread+0x76/0xb0 [ftrace_direct_modify] [ 74.784766] kthread+0xf5/0x120 [ 74.785052] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [ 74.785464] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 74.785781] </TASK> Fix this by using register_ftrace_function_nolock in ftrace_modify_direct_caller. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220927004146.1215303-1-song@kernel.org Fixes: 53cd885 ("ftrace: Allow IPMODIFY and DIRECT ops on the same function") Reported-and-tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2022
By keep sending L2CAP_CONF_REQ packets, chan->num_conf_rsp increases
multiple times and eventually it will wrap around the maximum number
(i.e., 255).
This patch prevents this by adding a boundary check with
L2CAP_MAX_CONF_RSP
Btmon log:
Bluetooth monitor ver 5.64
= Note: Linux version 6.1.0-rc2 (x86_64) 0.264594
= Note: Bluetooth subsystem version 2.22 0.264636
@ MGMT Open: btmon (privileged) version 1.22 {0x0001} 0.272191
= New Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Primary,Virtual,hci0) [hci0] 13.877604
@ RAW Open: 9496 (privileged) version 2.22 {0x0002} 13.890741
= Open Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 [hci0] 13.900426
(...)
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #32 [hci0] 14.273106
invalid packet size (12 != 1033)
08 00 01 00 02 01 04 00 01 10 ff ff ............
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1547 #33 [hci0] 14.273561
invalid packet size (14 != 1547)
0a 00 01 00 04 01 06 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 ........@.....
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #34 [hci0] 14.274390
invalid packet size (16 != 2061)
0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 ........@.......
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #35 [hci0] 14.274932
invalid packet size (16 != 2061)
0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 07 00 03 00 ........@.......
= bluetoothd: Bluetooth daemon 5.43 14.401828
> ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #36 [hci0] 14.275753
invalid packet size (12 != 1033)
08 00 01 00 04 01 04 00 40 00 00 00 ........@...
Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 22, 2022
[ Upstream commit bcd7026 ] By keep sending L2CAP_CONF_REQ packets, chan->num_conf_rsp increases multiple times and eventually it will wrap around the maximum number (i.e., 255). This patch prevents this by adding a boundary check with L2CAP_MAX_CONF_RSP Btmon log: Bluetooth monitor ver 5.64 = Note: Linux version 6.1.0-rc2 (x86_64) 0.264594 = Note: Bluetooth subsystem version 2.22 0.264636 @ MGMT Open: btmon (privileged) version 1.22 {0x0001} 0.272191 = New Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Primary,Virtual,hci0) [hci0] 13.877604 @ RAW Open: 9496 (privileged) version 2.22 {0x0002} 13.890741 = Open Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 [hci0] 13.900426 (...) > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #32 [hci0] 14.273106 invalid packet size (12 != 1033) 08 00 01 00 02 01 04 00 01 10 ff ff ............ > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1547 #33 [hci0] 14.273561 invalid packet size (14 != 1547) 0a 00 01 00 04 01 06 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 ........@..... > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #34 [hci0] 14.274390 invalid packet size (16 != 2061) 0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 ........@....... > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #35 [hci0] 14.274932 invalid packet size (16 != 2061) 0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 07 00 03 00 ........@....... = bluetoothd: Bluetooth daemon 5.43 14.401828 > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #36 [hci0] 14.275753 invalid packet size (12 != 1033) 08 00 01 00 04 01 04 00 40 00 00 00 ........@... Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 22, 2022
[ Upstream commit bcd7026 ] By keep sending L2CAP_CONF_REQ packets, chan->num_conf_rsp increases multiple times and eventually it will wrap around the maximum number (i.e., 255). This patch prevents this by adding a boundary check with L2CAP_MAX_CONF_RSP Btmon log: Bluetooth monitor ver 5.64 = Note: Linux version 6.1.0-rc2 (x86_64) 0.264594 = Note: Bluetooth subsystem version 2.22 0.264636 @ MGMT Open: btmon (privileged) version 1.22 {0x0001} 0.272191 = New Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 (Primary,Virtual,hci0) [hci0] 13.877604 @ RAW Open: 9496 (privileged) version 2.22 {0x0002} 13.890741 = Open Index: 00:00:00:00:00:00 [hci0] 13.900426 (...) > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #32 [hci0] 14.273106 invalid packet size (12 != 1033) 08 00 01 00 02 01 04 00 01 10 ff ff ............ > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1547 #33 [hci0] 14.273561 invalid packet size (14 != 1547) 0a 00 01 00 04 01 06 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 ........@..... > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #34 [hci0] 14.274390 invalid packet size (16 != 2061) 0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 ........@....... > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 2061 #35 [hci0] 14.274932 invalid packet size (16 != 2061) 0c 00 01 00 04 01 08 00 40 00 00 00 07 00 03 00 ........@....... = bluetoothd: Bluetooth daemon 5.43 14.401828 > ACL Data RX: Handle 200 flags 0x00 dlen 1033 #36 [hci0] 14.275753 invalid packet size (12 != 1033) 08 00 01 00 04 01 04 00 40 00 00 00 ........@... Signed-off-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 14bb1e8 ] Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure: [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1 test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec [...] test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked! #33/1 btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL #33 btf_map_in_map:FAIL In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods, it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space. But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work is dequeued, the map will be actually freed. See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c. By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240322061353.632136-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit af9a873 ] During the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following abnormal printouts were found: [ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948 [ 2430.649622] Mem abort info: [ 2430.649829] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 2430.650115] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 2430.650564] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 2430.650795] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 2430.651032] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 2430.651446] Data abort info: [ 2430.651683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 2430.652001] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33 [ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10 [ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000 [ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19 [ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302 [ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342 [ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000 [ 2430.664217] Call trace: [ 2430.664528] kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.664855] jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.665233] i_callback+0x24/0x50 [ 2430.665528] rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448 [ 2430.665892] rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8 [ 2430.666151] rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28 [ 2430.666473] __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc [ 2430.666781] irq_exit+0xf0/0x110 [ 2430.667065] handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98 [ 2430.667447] gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8 [ 2430.667739] call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54 The parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of the jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info structure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these variables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing, which is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the function jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in the function jffs2_init_inode_info. The function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked, but in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered, which releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode is not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked may enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code. Since the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target, the fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once. Signed-off-by: Wang Yong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun <lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Yang Tao <yang.tao172@zte.com.cn> Cc: Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 14bb1e8 ] Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure: [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1 test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec [...] test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked! #33/1 btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL #33 btf_map_in_map:FAIL In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods, it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space. But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work is dequeued, the map will be actually freed. See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c. By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240322061353.632136-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit af9a873 ] During the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following abnormal printouts were found: [ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948 [ 2430.649622] Mem abort info: [ 2430.649829] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 2430.650115] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 2430.650564] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 2430.650795] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 2430.651032] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 2430.651446] Data abort info: [ 2430.651683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 2430.652001] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33 [ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10 [ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000 [ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19 [ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302 [ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342 [ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000 [ 2430.664217] Call trace: [ 2430.664528] kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.664855] jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.665233] i_callback+0x24/0x50 [ 2430.665528] rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448 [ 2430.665892] rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8 [ 2430.666151] rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28 [ 2430.666473] __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc [ 2430.666781] irq_exit+0xf0/0x110 [ 2430.667065] handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98 [ 2430.667447] gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8 [ 2430.667739] call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54 The parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of the jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info structure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these variables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing, which is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the function jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in the function jffs2_init_inode_info. The function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked, but in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered, which releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode is not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked may enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code. Since the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target, the fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once. Signed-off-by: Wang Yong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun <lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Yang Tao <yang.tao172@zte.com.cn> Cc: Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 14bb1e8 ] Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure: [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1 test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec [...] test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked! #33/1 btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL #33 btf_map_in_map:FAIL In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods, it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space. But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work is dequeued, the map will be actually freed. See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c. By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240322061353.632136-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 7, 2024
[ Upstream commit af9a873 ] During the stress testing of the jffs2 file system,the following abnormal printouts were found: [ 2430.649000] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0069696969696948 [ 2430.649622] Mem abort info: [ 2430.649829] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 2430.650115] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 2430.650564] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 2430.650795] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 2430.651032] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 2430.651446] Data abort info: [ 2430.651683] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 2430.652001] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 2430.652558] [0069696969696948] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 2430.653265] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2430.654512] CPU: 2 PID: 20919 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.15.25-g512f31242bf6 #33 [ 2430.655008] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 2430.655517] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2430.656142] pc : kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.656630] lr : jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.657051] sp : ffff800009eebd10 [ 2430.657355] x29: ffff800009eebd10 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.658327] x26: ffff000038f09d80 x25: 0080000000000000 x24: ffff800009d38000 [ 2430.658919] x23: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a x22: ffff000038f09d80 x21: ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.659434] x20: ffff0000bf9a6ac0 x19: 0169696969696940 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 2430.659969] x17: ffff8000b6506000 x16: ffff800009eec000 x15: 0000000000004000 [ 2430.660637] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 00000001000820a1 x12: 00000000000d1b19 [ 2430.661345] x11: 0004000800000000 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff8000084f0d14 [ 2430.662025] x8 : ffff0000bf9a6b40 x7 : ffff0000bf9a6b48 x6 : 0000000003470302 [ 2430.662695] x5 : ffff00002e41dcc0 x4 : ffff0000bf9aa3b0 x3 : 0000000003470342 [ 2430.663486] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff8000084f0d14 x0 : fffffc0000000000 [ 2430.664217] Call trace: [ 2430.664528] kfree+0x78/0x348 [ 2430.664855] jffs2_free_inode+0x24/0x48 [ 2430.665233] i_callback+0x24/0x50 [ 2430.665528] rcu_do_batch+0x1ac/0x448 [ 2430.665892] rcu_core+0x28c/0x3c8 [ 2430.666151] rcu_core_si+0x18/0x28 [ 2430.666473] __do_softirq+0x138/0x3cc [ 2430.666781] irq_exit+0xf0/0x110 [ 2430.667065] handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0x98 [ 2430.667447] gic_handle_irq+0xac/0xe8 [ 2430.667739] call_on_irq_stack+0x28/0x54 The parameter passed to kfree was 5a5a5a5a, which corresponds to the target field of the jffs_inode_info structure. It was found that all variables in the jffs_inode_info structure were 5a5a5a5a, except for the first member sem. It is suspected that these variables are not initialized because they were set to 5a5a5a5a during memory testing, which is meant to detect uninitialized memory.The sem variable is initialized in the function jffs2_i_init_once, while other members are initialized in the function jffs2_init_inode_info. The function jffs2_init_inode_info is called after iget_locked, but in the iget_locked function, the destroy_inode process is triggered, which releases the inode and consequently, the target member of the inode is not initialized.In concurrent high pressure scenarios, iget_locked may enter the destroy_inode branch as described in the code. Since the destroy_inode functionality of jffs2 only releases the target, the fix method is to set target to NULL in jffs2_i_init_once. Signed-off-by: Wang Yong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Lu Zhongjun <lu.zhongjun@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Yang Tao <yang.tao172@zte.com.cn> Cc: Xu Xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit e28acc9 ] Accessing `mr_table->mfc_cache_list` is protected by an RCU lock. In the following code flow, the RCU read lock is not held, causing the following error when `RCU_PROVE` is not held. The same problem might show up in the IPv6 code path. 6.12.0-rc5-kbuilder-01145-gbac17284bdcb #33 Tainted: G E N ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:313 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by RetransmitAggre/3519: #0: ffff88816188c6c0 (nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __netlink_dump_start+0x8a/0x290 #1: ffffffff83fcf7a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_dumpit+0x6b/0x90 stack backtrace: lockdep_rcu_suspicious mr_table_dump ipmr_rtm_dumproute rtnl_dump_all rtnl_dumpit netlink_dump __netlink_dump_start rtnetlink_rcv_msg netlink_rcv_skb netlink_unicast netlink_sendmsg This is not a problem per see, since the RTNL lock is held here, so, it is safe to iterate in the list without the RCU read lock, as suggested by Eric. To alleviate the concern, modify the code to use list_for_each_entry_rcu() with the RTNL-held argument. The annotation will raise an error only if RTNL or RCU read lock are missing during iteration, signaling a legitimate problem, otherwise it will avoid this false positive. This will solve the IPv6 case as well, since ip6mr_rtm_dumproute() calls this function as well. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241108-ipmr_rcu-v2-1-c718998e209b@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 19, 2024
[ Upstream commit e28acc9 ] Accessing `mr_table->mfc_cache_list` is protected by an RCU lock. In the following code flow, the RCU read lock is not held, causing the following error when `RCU_PROVE` is not held. The same problem might show up in the IPv6 code path. 6.12.0-rc5-kbuilder-01145-gbac17284bdcb #33 Tainted: G E N ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:313 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by RetransmitAggre/3519: #0: ffff88816188c6c0 (nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __netlink_dump_start+0x8a/0x290 #1: ffffffff83fcf7a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_dumpit+0x6b/0x90 stack backtrace: lockdep_rcu_suspicious mr_table_dump ipmr_rtm_dumproute rtnl_dump_all rtnl_dumpit netlink_dump __netlink_dump_start rtnetlink_rcv_msg netlink_rcv_skb netlink_unicast netlink_sendmsg This is not a problem per see, since the RTNL lock is held here, so, it is safe to iterate in the list without the RCU read lock, as suggested by Eric. To alleviate the concern, modify the code to use list_for_each_entry_rcu() with the RTNL-held argument. The annotation will raise an error only if RTNL or RCU read lock are missing during iteration, signaling a legitimate problem, otherwise it will avoid this false positive. This will solve the IPv6 case as well, since ip6mr_rtm_dumproute() calls this function as well. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241108-ipmr_rcu-v2-1-c718998e209b@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tobetter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 19, 2024
[ Upstream commit e28acc9 ] Accessing `mr_table->mfc_cache_list` is protected by an RCU lock. In the following code flow, the RCU read lock is not held, causing the following error when `RCU_PROVE` is not held. The same problem might show up in the IPv6 code path. 6.12.0-rc5-kbuilder-01145-gbac17284bdcb #33 Tainted: G E N ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:313 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by RetransmitAggre/3519: #0: ffff88816188c6c0 (nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __netlink_dump_start+0x8a/0x290 #1: ffffffff83fcf7a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_dumpit+0x6b/0x90 stack backtrace: lockdep_rcu_suspicious mr_table_dump ipmr_rtm_dumproute rtnl_dump_all rtnl_dumpit netlink_dump __netlink_dump_start rtnetlink_rcv_msg netlink_rcv_skb netlink_unicast netlink_sendmsg This is not a problem per see, since the RTNL lock is held here, so, it is safe to iterate in the list without the RCU read lock, as suggested by Eric. To alleviate the concern, modify the code to use list_for_each_entry_rcu() with the RTNL-held argument. The annotation will raise an error only if RTNL or RCU read lock are missing during iteration, signaling a legitimate problem, otherwise it will avoid this false positive. This will solve the IPv6 case as well, since ip6mr_rtm_dumproute() calls this function as well. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241108-ipmr_rcu-v2-1-c718998e209b@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Could support for the odroid go super be added to the odroid- branches?
I think it just needs the dts brought over.
https://wiki.odroid.com/odroid_go_advance/build_kernel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: