Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OneToOne inverse getter #151

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2019
Merged

OneToOne inverse getter #151

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 18, 2019

Conversation

homersimpsons
Copy link
Collaborator

Test And Implementation of OneToOne inverse getter

Closes #150

@homersimpsons homersimpsons changed the title one to one inverse getter OneToOne inverse getter Jul 18, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 18, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 97.23% when pulling ec64197 on homersimpsons:feature/one-to-one-inverse-getter into 3633fe0 on thecodingmachine:master.

@homersimpsons homersimpsons force-pushed the feature/one-to-one-inverse-getter branch from df6b084 to 301515c Compare July 18, 2019 15:38
@moufmouf moufmouf merged commit 906daf1 into thecodingmachine:master Jul 18, 2019
@homersimpsons homersimpsons deleted the feature/one-to-one-inverse-getter branch July 19, 2019 08:05
@homersimpsons homersimpsons mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2019
Merged
@moufmouf moufmouf added this to the 5.1 milestone Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@moufmouf moufmouf moufmouf approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.1
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OneToOne inverse relation is Mapped as OneToMany
3 participants
@homersimpsons @coveralls @moufmouf