Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Require Ruby 3.1 + lint with cookstyle #278

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025
Merged

Fix: Require Ruby 3.1 + lint with cookstyle #278

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

tas50
Copy link
Member

@tas50 tas50 commented Dec 3, 2024

Description

Sync this repo with how things are done in other TK repos

Issues Resolved

List any existing issues this PR resolves, or any Discourse or
StackOverflow discussions that are relevant

Type of Change

Our release process assumes you are using Conventional Commit messages.

The most important prefixes you should have in mind are:

  • _fix_: which represents bug fixes, and correlates to a SemVer patch.
  • _feat_: which represents a new feature, and correlates to a SemVer minor.
  • _feat!_:, or fix!:, refactor!:, etc., which represent a breaking change (indicated by the !) and will result in a major version change.

If you have not included a conventional commit message this can be fixed on merge.

Check List

tas50 added 4 commits December 2, 2024 19:22
Sync this repo with how things are done in other TK repos

Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith84@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith84@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith84@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Smith <tsmith84@gmail.com>
@tas50 tas50 requested a review from damacus February 18, 2025 18:57
@damacus damacus changed the title Require Ruby 3.1 + lint with cookstyle Fix: Require Ruby 3.1 + lint with cookstyle Mar 2, 2025
@damacus damacus enabled auto-merge (squash) March 2, 2025 22:13
@damacus damacus merged commit b9bba1b into main Mar 3, 2025
6 checks passed
@damacus damacus deleted the tas50/ruby_31 branch March 3, 2025 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants