deps: V8: cherry-pick 93b2105fbe44

Original commit message:

    [wasm][ia32][liftoff] Implement AtomicCompareExchange

    As there are not enough registers on ia32 to execute the platform-
    independent code, the CL also adds ia32-specific code to
    liftoff-compiler.cc. For this we first retrieve the memory index from
    the stack, do a bounds check, and calculate the final address. Only
    afterwards we pop all other values from the stack and pass them to the
    platform-dependent code.

    R=clemensb@chromium.org

    Bug: v8:10108
    Change-Id: I741266a9523c8b5c46acc0b29817fd143a75752e
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2316305
    Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69047}

Refs: v8/v8@93b2105

PR-URL: nodejs#38275
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>

common.gypi

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 
     # Reset this number to 0 on major V8 upgrades.
     # Increment by one for each non-official patch applied to deps/v8.
-    'v8_embedder_string': '-node.53',
+    'v8_embedder_string': '-node.54',
 
     ##### V8 defaults for Node.js #####
 

deps/v8/src/wasm/baseline/ia32/liftoff-assembler-ia32.h

@@ -532,7 +532,123 @@ void LiftoffAssembler::AtomicCompareExchange(
     Register dst_addr, Register offset_reg, uint32_t offset_imm,
     LiftoffRegister expected, LiftoffRegister new_value, LiftoffRegister result,
     StoreType type) {
-  bailout(kAtomics, "AtomicCompareExchange");
+  // We expect that the offset has already been added to {dst_addr}, and no
+  // {offset_reg} is provided. This is to save registers.
+  DCHECK_EQ(offset_reg, no_reg);
+
+  DCHECK_EQ(result, expected);
+
+  if (type.value() != StoreType::kI64Store) {
+    bool is_64_bit_op = type.value_type() == kWasmI64;
+
+    Register value_reg = is_64_bit_op ? new_value.low_gp() : new_value.gp();
+    Register expected_reg = is_64_bit_op ? expected.low_gp() : expected.gp();
+    Register result_reg = expected_reg;
+
+    bool is_byte_store = type.size() == 1;
+    LiftoffRegList pinned =
+        LiftoffRegList::ForRegs(dst_addr, value_reg, expected_reg);
+
+    // Ensure that {value_reg} is a valid register.
+    if (is_byte_store && !liftoff::kByteRegs.has(value_reg)) {
+      Register safe_value_reg =
+          pinned.set(GetUnusedRegister(liftoff::kByteRegs, pinned)).gp();
+      mov(safe_value_reg, value_reg);
+      value_reg = safe_value_reg;
+      pinned.clear(LiftoffRegister(value_reg));
+    }
+
+    // The cmpxchg instruction uses eax to store the old value of the
+    // compare-exchange primitive. Therefore we have to spill the register and
+    // move any use to another register.
+    ClearRegister(eax, {&dst_addr, &value_reg}, pinned);
+    if (expected_reg != eax) {
+      mov(eax, expected_reg);
+    }
+
+    Operand dst_op = Operand(dst_addr, offset_imm);
+
+    lock();
+    switch (type.value()) {
+      case StoreType::kI32Store8:
+      case StoreType::kI64Store8: {
+        cmpxchg_b(dst_op, value_reg);
+        movzx_b(result_reg, eax);
+        break;
+      }
+      case StoreType::kI32Store16:
+      case StoreType::kI64Store16: {
+        cmpxchg_w(dst_op, value_reg);
+        movzx_w(result_reg, eax);
+        break;
+      }
+      case StoreType::kI32Store:
+      case StoreType::kI64Store32: {
+        cmpxchg(dst_op, value_reg);
+        if (result_reg != eax) {
+          mov(result_reg, eax);
+        }
+        break;
+      }
+      default:
+        UNREACHABLE();
+    }
+    if (is_64_bit_op) {
+      xor_(result.high_gp(), result.high_gp());
+    }
+    return;
+  }
+
+  // The following code handles kExprI64AtomicCompareExchange.
+
+  // We need {ebx} here, which is the root register. The root register it
+  // needs special treatment. As we use {ebx} directly in the code below, we
+  // have to make sure here that the root register is actually {ebx}.
+  static_assert(kRootRegister == ebx,
+                "The following code assumes that kRootRegister == ebx");
+  push(kRootRegister);
+
+  // The compare-exchange instruction uses registers as follows:
+  // old-value = EDX:EAX; new-value = ECX:EBX.
+  Register expected_hi = edx;
+  Register expected_lo = eax;
+  Register new_hi = ecx;
+  Register new_lo = ebx;
+  // The address needs a separate registers that does not alias with the
+  // ones above.
+  Register address = esi;
+
+  // Spill all these registers if they are still holding other values.
+  liftoff::SpillRegisters(this, expected_hi, expected_lo, new_hi, address);
+
+  // We have to set new_lo specially, because it's the root register. We do it
+  // before setting all other registers so that the original value does not get
+  // overwritten.
+  mov(new_lo, new_value.low_gp());
+
+  // Move all other values into the right register.
+  {
+    LiftoffAssembler::ParallelRegisterMoveTuple reg_moves[]{
+        {LiftoffRegister(address), LiftoffRegister(dst_addr), kWasmI32},
+        {LiftoffRegister::ForPair(expected_lo, expected_hi), expected, kWasmI64},
+        {LiftoffRegister(new_hi), new_value.high(), kWasmI32}};
+    ParallelRegisterMove(ArrayVector(reg_moves));
+  };
+
+  Operand dst_op = Operand(address, offset_imm);
+
+  lock();
+  cmpxchg8b(dst_op);
+
+  // Restore the root register, and we are done.
+  pop(kRootRegister);
+
+  // Move the result into the correct registers.
+  {
+    LiftoffAssembler::ParallelRegisterMoveTuple reg_moves[]{
+        {result, LiftoffRegister::ForPair(expected_lo, expected_hi), kWasmI64}};
+    ParallelRegisterMove(ArrayVector(reg_moves));
+  }
 }
 
 void LiftoffAssembler::AtomicFence() { mfence(); }

deps/v8/src/wasm/baseline/liftoff-compiler.cc

@@ -2879,9 +2879,38 @@ class LiftoffCompiler {
   void AtomicCompareExchange(FullDecoder* decoder, StoreType type,
                              const MemoryAccessImmediate<validate>& imm) {
 #ifdef V8_TARGET_ARCH_IA32
-    // With the current implementation we do not have enough registers on ia32
-    // to even get to the platform-specific code. Therefore we bailout early.
-    unsupported(decoder, kAtomics, "AtomicCompareExchange");
+    // On ia32 we don't have enough registers to first pop all the values off
+    // the stack and then start with the code generation. Instead we do the
+    // complete address calculation first, so that the address only needs a
+    // single register. Afterwards we load all remaining values into the
+    // other registers.
+    LiftoffRegList pinned;
+    Register index_reg = pinned.set(__ PeekToRegister(2, pinned)).gp();
+    if (BoundsCheckMem(decoder, type.size(), imm.offset, index_reg, pinned,
+                       kDoForceCheck)) {
+      return;
+    }
+    AlignmentCheckMem(decoder, type.size(), imm.offset, index_reg, pinned);
+
+    uint32_t offset = imm.offset;
+    index_reg = AddMemoryMasking(index_reg, &offset, &pinned);
+    Register addr = pinned.set(__ GetUnusedRegister(kGpReg, pinned)).gp();
+    LOAD_INSTANCE_FIELD(addr, MemoryStart, kSystemPointerSize);
+    __ emit_i32_add(addr, addr, index_reg);
+    pinned.clear(LiftoffRegister(index_reg));
+    LiftoffRegister new_value = pinned.set(__ PopToRegister(pinned));
+    LiftoffRegister expected = pinned.set(__ PopToRegister(pinned));
+
+    // Pop the index from the stack.
+    __ cache_state()->stack_state.pop_back(1);
+
+    LiftoffRegister result = expected;
+
+    // We already added the index to addr, so we can just pass no_reg to the
+    // assembler now.
+    __ AtomicCompareExchange(addr, no_reg, offset, expected, new_value, result,
+                             type);
+    __ PushRegister(type.value_type(), result);
     return;
 #else
     ValueType result_type = type.value_type();