Use Mamba Instead of Conda When Running Benchmarks

[atharva-2001]

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix | 🎢 infrastructure

It appears to me that it takes a long time for conda to solve the new environment, which can be done easily with Mamba. A new asv release a few months back allows mamba as a environment type. This adds that along with an action that installs mamba and asv into the environment.

📌 Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Testing pipeline
• Other method (describe)
• My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (799e35b) and the latest commit (ee7e251).
Here are the logs produced by ASV.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Significantly changed benchmarks:

· Benchmark list file .asv/results/benchmarks.json missing!
Use `asv run --bench just-discover` to regenerate benchmarks.json

All benchmarks:

· Benchmark list file .asv/results/benchmarks.json missing!
Use `asv run --bench just-discover` to regenerate benchmarks.json

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (799e35b) 68.72% compared to head (ee7e251) 68.72%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2455   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.72%   68.72%           
=======================================
  Files         157      157           
  Lines       13872    13872           
=======================================
  Hits         9534     9534           
  Misses       4338     4338           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[atharva-2001]

Some of the steps are skipped. I raised a GitHub ticket about this. I would remove the last two commits if either I get a response from GitHub or I am able to resolve the issue.

[andrewfullard]

Still seeing empty "linux-64" and "osx-64" actions in the PR checks.

[atharva-2001]

Sample run on my master to check if this works-
https://github.com/atharva-2001/tardis/actions/runs/7017859130/job/19092042011

PR run-
https://github.com/atharva-2001/tardis/actions/runs/7018130330/job/19092866057?pr=38